Characterizing clutter in the context of detecting weak gaseous plumes in hyperspectral imagery

Sensors

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1587-1615

  Burr, Tom ^a   Foy, Bernard R ^a   Fry, Herb ^a   McVey, Brian ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central limit theorem; Clutter; Generalized least squares; Mixture distribution; Near infrared; Single component multivariate Gaussian

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT MIXTURES; CHEMICAL DETECTION; INFRARED DEVICES; MIXTURES; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTROSCOPY;

CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM; GAUSSIANS; GENERALIZED LEAST SQUARE; MIXTURE DISTRIBUTIONS; NEAR INFRARED;

CLUTTER (INFORMATION THEORY);

EID: 33947425245     PISSN: 14243210     EISSN: 14248220     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s6111587     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AVIRIS Free Standard Data Products, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), http://aviris.jpl.nasa. gov/html/aviris.freedata.html.
2. Vane, G.; Green, R.; Chrien, T.; Enmark, H.; Hansen, E.; Porter, W. The Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). Remote Sensing of the Environment 1993, 44, 127-143.
3. Theiler, J.; Foy, B.; Fraser, A. Characterizing non-Gaussian Clutter and Detecting Weak Gaseous Plumes in Hyperspectral Imagery. Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XI, Proc. SPIE. 2005, 5806, 182-193.
4. McVey, B.; Burr, T.; Fry, H. Distribution of Chemical False Positives for Hyperspectral Image Data. Los Alamos National Laboratory Restricted Release Technical Report LA-CP-02-521, 2003.
5. Bernhardt, M.; Heather, J.; Smith, M. New Models for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection and Un-Mixing. Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XII, edited by Sylvia S. Shen, Paul E. Lewis, Proc. SPIE. 2005, 5806, 720-730.
6. Villeneuve, P.; Fry, H.; Theiler, J.; Smith, B.; Stocker, A. Improved Matched-Filter Detection Techniques. Proc. SPIE. 1999, 3753, 278-285.
7. Manolakis, D.; Marden, D.; Kerekes, J.; Shaw, G. On the Statistics of Hyperspectral Imaging Data. Proc. SPIE. 2001, 4381, 308-316.
8. Harsanyi, J.; Chang, C. Hyperspectral Image Classification and Dimensionality Reduction: an Orthogonal Subspace Projection Approach. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1994, 32, 779-785.
9. Marden, D.; Manolakis, D. Modeling Hyperspectral Imaging Data. Proc. SPIE. 2003, 5093, 253-262.
10. Marden, D.; Manolakis, D. Using Elliptically Contoured Distributions to Model Hyperspectral Imaging Data and Generate Statistically Similar Synthetic Data. Proc. SPIE. 2004, 5425, 558-572.
11. Funk, C.; Theiler, J.; Roberts, D.; Borel, C. Clustering to Improve Matched Filter Detection of Weak Gas Plumes in Hyperspectral Thermal Imagery. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2001, 39, 1410-1420.
12. Manolakis, D.; Siracusa, C.; Marden, D.; Shaw, G. Hyperspectral Adaptive Matched Filter Detectors: Practical Performance Comparison, Proc. SPIE. 2001, 4357, 18-33.
13. Manolakis, D.; Shaw, G. Detection Algorithms for Hyperspectral Imaging Applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2002, 79(1), 29-43.
14. Bajorski, P. Analytical Comparison of the Matched Filter and Orthogonal Subspace Projection Detectors in Structured Models for Hyperspectral Images. Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XII, edited by Sylvia S. Shen, Paul E. Lewis, Proc. SPIE. 2006, 6233, 1-12.
15. Gallagher, N.; Sheen, D.; Shaver, J.; Wise, B.; Shultz, J. Estimation of Trace Vapor Concentration-Pathlength in Plumes for Remote Sensing Applications From Hyperspectral Images. Proc. SPIE. 2003, 5093, 184-194.
16. Foy, B.; Theiler, J.; Fraser, A. Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Adaptive Matched Filter, to appear in: Proc. MSS (Military Sensing Symposia) Passive Sensors Conference, 2006, private communication.
17. Young, S.; Johnson, B.; Hackwell J. An In-scene Method for Atmospheric Compensation of Thermal Hyperspectral Data. J. Geophys. Res. Atm. 2002, 107, 4774-4774.
18. FASCODE for atmospheric transmission calculations, see http://www.vs.afrl.af.mil/ProductLines/IR-Clutter/fascode.aspx
19. Foy, B.; Petrin, R.; Quick, R.; Shimada, T.; Tiee, J. Comparisons Between Hyperspectral Passive and Multispectral Active Sensor Measurements. Proc. SPIE. 2002, 4722, 98-109.
20. Carroll, R.; Ruppert, D.; Stefanski, L. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models, Chapman and Hall, London, 1996; pp 1-78.
21. Burr, T.; Fry, H.; McVey, B.; Sander, E. Chemical Identification using Bayesian Model Selection, 2002 Proc. of the American Statistical Association, Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences [CD-ROM], Ann Arbor, Michigan: American Statistical Association, LA-UR 02-7281.
22. Heasler, P.; Hylden, J. Technical Letter Report for Non-Linear methods Task: Fits of Nonlinear Bayesian Regression (NBLR) to Tanasi and Polecat Images, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Official Use Only Report, 2005.
23. McVey, B. Official use only internal presentation, cited with permission, 2004.
24. nd edition, Wiley: New York, 1992.
25. Burr, T.; Fry, H.; McVey, B.; Sander, E.; Cavenaugh, J.; Neath, A. Performance of Variable Selection Methods in Regression using Variations of the Bayesian Information Criterion, LAUR-05-6324, submitted for publication, 2005
26. Raftery, A; Madigan, D.; Hoeting, J. Bayesian Model Averaging for Linear Regression Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997, 92, 179-191.
27. DiCiccio, T.; Kass, R.; Raftery, A.; Wasserman, L. Computing Bayes Factors by Combining Simulation and Asymptotic Approximations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997, 92, 903-915.
28. Kass, R.; Raftery, A. Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90, 773-795.
29. Neath, A.; Cavanaugh, J. Regression and Time Series Model Selection Using Variants of the Schwarz Information Criterion. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 1997, 26, 559-580.
30. Mardia, K., Tests of Univariate and Multivariate Normality, Handbook of Statistics Vol. 1; North-Holland Publishing Co, 1980; pp 279-320.
31. Splus 7 for Windows, Insightful Corp., 2005.
32. Burr, T.; Foy, B.; Fry, F.; McVey, B. Characterizing Clutter in the Context of Detecting Weak Gaseous Plumes using the SEBASS Sensor. Los Alamos National Laboratory Restricted Release Report, LA-CP-06-0982, 2006, private communication.
33. Chung, K., A Course in Probability Theory, Academic Press: Orlando, 1974; pp 196-249.