Perception of self-efficacy and rehabiltation among neurologically disabled adults

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 230-240

  Dixo, Guy ^a   Thornton, Everard W ^a   Young, Carolyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSEVERATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REASSURANCE; SELF CONCEPT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABLED PERSON; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; GOALS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 33947410912     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215506071784     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barnes MP. Principles of neurological rehabilitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74 (suppl IV): Iv3-7.
2. Salmon P. Psychology of medicine and surgery. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
3. Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 495-506.
4. Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 639-54.
5. Lenze E, Munin M, Quear T et al. The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 380-84.
6. Lenze E, Munin M, Quear T et al. Significance of poor patient participation in physical and occupational therapy for functional outcome and length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1599-601.
7. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. WH Freeman, 1997.
8. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 623-49.
9. Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 943-50.
10. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M eds. Measures in health psychology: a user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-Nelson, 1995.
11. Pajares F. Current directions in self-efficacy research. In Maehr M, Pintrich PR eds. Advances in motivation and achievement. Volume 10. JAI Press, 1997.
12. Evans SA, Airey MC, Chell SM, Connelly JB, Rigby AS, Tennant A. Disability in young adults following major trauma: 5 year follow-up of survivors. BMC Public Health 2003; 3: 8.
13. Rigby SA, Domenech C, Thornton EW, Tedman S, Young CA. Development and validation of a self-efficacy measure for people with multiple sclerosis: The Multiple Sclerosis Self-efficacy Scale. Multiple Sclerosis 2003; 9: 73-81.
14. DeVellis R. Scale development: theory and applications, second edition. Sage Publications, 2003.
15. Bowling A. Research methods in health, second edition. Open University Press, 2002.
16. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ 2000; 321: 1051-54.
17. Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 639-54.
18. Burns R. Introduction to research methods, fourth edition. Sage Publications, 2000.
19. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation. A qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke 2002; 33: 444-48.
20. Wottrich AW, Stenström CH, Engardt M, Tham K, von Koch L. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1198-205.
21. Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C. Patients' expectations of recovery following stroke: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 841-50.
22. Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1411-22.
23. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ 2000; 321: 1051-54.
24. Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1-8.
25. O'Connell B, Hanna B, Penney W, Pearce J, Owen M, Warelow P. Recovery after stroke: a qualitative perspective. J Qual Clin Pract 2001; 21: 120-25.
26. Schwartz CE, Coulthard-Morris L, Zeng Q, Retzlaff P. Measuring self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis: a validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 394-98.
27. Airlie J, Baker GA, Smith SJ, Young CA. Measuring the impact of multiple sclerosis on psychosocial functioning: the development of a new self efficacy scale. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 59-65.
28. Hewlett S, Cockshott Z, Kirwan J, Barrett J, Stamp J, Haslock I. Development and validation of a self-efficacy scale for use in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RASE). Rheumatology 2001; 40: 1221-30.
29. Kobau R, Dilorio C. Epilepsy self-management: a comparison of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy for medication adherence and lifestyle behaviours among people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2003; 4: 217-25.