Intellectual property rights

Library Hi Tech

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 12-22

  Einar Himma, Kenneth ^a   Spinello, Richard A ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyright law; Intellectual property

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947403085     PISSN: 07378831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/07378830710735821     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster (2001), 239 F. 3d 1004 [9th Cir].
2. Anand, B. and Galetovic, A. (2004), “Shielding intellectual property”, The Wall Street Journal, 30 November, p. B2.
3. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose (1994), 510 U.S. 569.
4. Coca-Cola v. Alma-Leo, U.S.A., Inc. (1989), 719 F. Supp. 725 [N.D. Ill.].
5. Dam, K.W. (1994), “The economic underpinnings of patent law”, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23, p. 247.
6. Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1980), 450 U.S. 175.
7. Diamond v. Diehr (1981), 101 U.S. 1048.
8. Drahos, P. (1996), A Philosophy of Intellectual Property, Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot.
9. Easterbrook, F. (1990), “Intellectual property is still property”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 3, p. 110.
10. Fisher, W. (1998), “Property and contract on the internet”, available at: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ipcoop/98fish.html.
11. Goldstein, P. (1994), Copyright's Highway, Hill & Wang, New York, NY.
12. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters (1985), 471 U.S., 539, 85 L. Ed. 2d 588.
13. Kay, J. (1993), “The economics of intellectual property rights”, International Review of Law & Economics, Vol. 13, p. 344.
14. Kieff, F.S. (2000), “Property rights and property rules for commercializing inventions”, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 697.
15. Kitch, E. (2000), “The law and economics of intellectual property rights”, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 53, p. 1727.
16. Landes, W. and Posner, R. (1987), “Trademark law: an economic perspective”, Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 30, p. 265.
17. Lehman, B. (2005), “Don't fear software patents”, The Wall Street Journal, 30 August, p. B2.
18. Locke, J. (1952), The Second Treatise of Government, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN, (original work published 1690).
19. Magliocca, G. (2001), “One and inseparable: dilution and infringement in trademark law”, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 949.
20. Merges, R., Mennell, P. and Lemley, M. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights in the New Technological Age, 2nd ed., Aspen Publishers, New York, NY.
21. Merrill, S., Levin, R. and Myers, M. (Eds) (2004), A Patent System for the Twenty-first Century, National Academies Press, Washington DC.
22. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster, Ltd (2004), 380 F.3d 1154 [9th Cir.].
23. Mortellito v. Nina of California, Inc. (1972), 335 F. Supp 1288 [S.D. N.Y.].
24. Restatement of Torts (1939), § 757.
25. Shavell, S. and van Ypersele, T. (1999), “Rewards versus intellectual property rights”, National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 6956.
26. Spinello, R. and Tavani, H. (2005), “Intellectual property rights: from theory to practical implementation”, in Ed. Spinello, R. and Ed. Tavani, H.T. (Eds), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World: Theory and Practice, Idea Group Publishing, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 3-66.
27. U.S.C., 17 § 106.
28. US Constitution, Art. 1, § 8, cl. 8.
29. Utility Examination Guidelines (2001), 66 Fed. Reg., 1092.
30. Video Pipeline, Inc. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc. (2003), 342 F. 3d 191 [3d Cir.].
31. Volswagenwerk v. Rickard (1974), 492 F.2d 474 [5th Cir.].
32. Wagner, R.P. (2003), “Information wants to be free: intellectual property and the mythologies of control”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 103, p. 995.
33. Washington Pub. Co. v. Pearson (1954), 306 U.S. 30.
34. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. (1995), 514 U.S. 159.