Assessment and the national languages strategy

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 17-33

  Jones, Neil ^a,b  

^a Cambridge ESOL ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b Cambridge ESOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947398049     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057640601178857     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alderson, J. C., Figueras, N., Kuijper, H., Nold, G., Takala, S. & Tardieu, C. (2004) The development of specifications for item development and classification within the common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Reading and listening. The final report of the Dutch CEF Construct Project. Project Report, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. Accessed online at: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/44/ (accessed 13 February 2007).
2. ALL (2006) The 'severe grading' of MFL grades at GCSE and A level. Available online at http://www.all-london.org.uk/all_position_statement.htm (accessed 20 February 2007).
3. Assessment Reform Group (1999) Assessment for learning: beyond the black box. Available online at: www.qca.org.uk/7444.html (accessed 13 February 2007).
4. Bachman, L. F. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
5. Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M. (2001) Applying the Rasch model (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
6. Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing, Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
7. CILT (online) www.cilt.org.uk/commlangs/curricul.htm#LangLadder (accessed 13 February 2007).
8. Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
9. Council of Europe (2002) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment: case studies (Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing).
10. Council of Europe (2003) Relating language examinations to the CEFR. Manual; preliminary pilot version. Available online at: www.coe.int/t/dg4/ linguistic/Manuel1_EN.asp (accessed 13 February 2007)
11. Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T. & McNamara, T. (1999) Dictionary of language testing. Studies in language testing 7 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
12. DfES (2002) Languages for all: languages for life. Available online at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/languagesstrategy/ (accessed 13 February 2007).
13. DfES (2004) 14-19 curriculum and qualifications reform: final report of the Working Group on 14-19 Reform. Available online at: http://news.bbc.co.Uk/1/ shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/15_02_05_tomlinson.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
14. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991) Fundamentals of item response theory, Volume 2 (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
15. Hughes, A. (1989) Testing for language teachers (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
16. Jones, N. (2000) Background to the validation of the ALTE Can Do Project and the revised Common European Framework, Research Notes, 2, 11-13. Available online at: http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/offprints/pdfs/ RN2p11-13.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
17. Jones, N. (2002) Relating the ALTE Framework to the Common European Framework of Reference, in: Council of Europe (Eds) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment: case studies (Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing), 167-183.
18. Jones, N. (2005) Raising the Languages Ladder: constructing a new framework for accrediting foreign language skills, Research Notes, 19. Available online at: http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/rs_nts19.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
19. Leung, C. (2004) Developing formative teacher assessment, Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(1), 19-41.
20. Luecht, R. (2004) Multistage complexity in language proficiency assessment: a framework for aligning theoretical perspectives, test development and psychometrics, Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 527-535.
21. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S. & Almond, R. G. (2002) Design and analysis in task-based language assessment, Language Testing, 19(4), 477-496.
22. North, B. (2004) Europe's framework promotes language discussion, not directives, The Guardian. Available online at: http://education.guardian. co.uk/tefl/story/0,5500,1191130,00.html (accessed 13 February 2007).
23. Nuffield Languages Inquiry (2000) Languages: the next generation. Available online at: http:// languages.nuffieldfoundation.org/filelibrary/pdf/ languages_finalreport.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
24. Nuffield Languages Programme (2002) A Learning Ladder for Languages: possibilities, risks and benefits. Available online at: http://languages. nuffieldfoundation.org/filelibrary/pdf learning_ladder.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
25. Pellegrino, J. (2003) The 'second transformation' - issues in combining advances the learning sciences with IT capabilities, paper presented to the NRC ILIT Committee, January 2003.
26. Pollitt, A. (1991) Giving students a sporting chance: assessment by counting and by judging, in: J. C. Alderson & B. North (Eds) Language testing in the 1990s: the communicative legacy (London, Macmillan), 46-49.
27. Shepard, L. A. (2005) Competing paradigms for classroom assessment: echoes of the tests-and-measurement model, lecture and Powerpoint slides presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April.
28. Spolsky, B. (1986) A multiple choice for language testers, Language Testing, 3(2), 147-158.
29. Spolsky, B. (1995) Measured words: development of objective language testing (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
30. Tattersall, K. (2004) Teacher assessment: realistic objective or impossible dream?, paper presented at AEA Europe Conference, Budapest, November. Available online at: http:// www.aea-europe.net/page-164.html (accessed 13 February 2007).
31. Taylor, L. & Jones, N. (2006) Cambridge ESOL exams and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), Research Notes, 24, 2-5. Available online at: http://www.cambridgee-sol.org/rs_notes/rs_nts24.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
32. Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M. (1990) Threshold 1990 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
33. Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M. (1990) Waystage 1990 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
34. Weir, C. (2004) Language testing and validation (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
35. Weir, C. & Shaw, S. D. (2005) Establishing the validity of Cambridge ESOL writing tests: towards the implementation of a socio-cognitive model for test validation, Research Notes, 21, 10-14. Available online at: www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/offprints/pdfs/RN21p10-14.pdf (accessed 13 February 2007).
36. Wiliam, D. (2004) Keeping learning on track: integrating assessment with instruction, invited address to the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Philadelphia, June.
37. Wright, B. D. & Stone, M. H. (1979) Best test design (Chicago, IL, MESA Press).
38. Zieky, M. J. (2001) So much remains the same: conception and status of validation, in: G. J. Cizek (Ed.) Setting performance standards: concepts, methods and perspectives (New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers).