Risk management in public-private partnership contracts

Public Organization Review

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-19

  Nisar, Tahir M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Public private partnership; Risk management; Secondary financing markets; Value for money

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947392882     PISSN: 15667170     EISSN: 15737098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-006-0020-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allen, G. 2001. The private finance initiative. House of Commons Library. Research Paper 01/117.
2. Anderson, A., & LSE Enterprise. 2000. Value for money drivers in the private finance initiative, report commissioned by the UK Treasury Task Force on public-private partnerships.
3. Besley, T., & Maitreesh, G. 2001. Government versus private ownership of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1343-1372.
4. Bloomfield, P., Westerling, D., & Carey, R. 1998. Innovation and risks in a public-private partnership financing and construction of a capital project in Massachusetts. Public Productivity and Review, 21(4): 460-471.
5. Daniels, R. J., & Trebilcock. M. J. 1996. Private provision of public infrastructure: An organizational analysis of the next privatization frontier. University of Toronto Law Journal, 46: 375-426.
6. Department of Transport. 2002. Public sector comparators factsheet, http://www.railways.dtlr.gov.uk.
7. Dutch National Audit Office. 2002. Nieuwe financiële instrumenten in publiek-private samenwerking. The Hague.
8. Edwards, P., & Shaoul, J. 2003. Partnerships: For better, for worse? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(3): 397-421.
9. Expertise Centre PPP. 2002. Voortgangsrapportage maart 2001. The Hague: Ministry of Finance.
10. Fitzgerald, P. 2004. Review of partnerships Victoria provided infrastructure, final report to the Treasurer, Melbourne: Growth Solutions Group, January.
11. Froud, J., & Shaoul, J. 2001. Appraising and evaluating PFI for NHS hospitals. Financial Accountability and Management, 17(3): 247-270.
12. Grahame, A. 2003. The private finance initiative (PFI). London: House of Commons Library. Research paper no. 03/79.
13. Greve, C. 2003. When public-private partnerships fail. The extreme case of the NPM-inspired local government of Farum in Denmark, paper for the EGPA conference, 3-6 September, Oerias, Portugal.
14. Hall, J. 1998. Private opportunity, public benefit? Fiscal Studies, 19(2): 121-140.
15. Hart, O. 2003. Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships. Economic Journal, 113(486): C69-C76.
16. Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR). 2001. The risky business of public-private partnerships to deliver on public services, Current Topics, 25 June, http://www.ippr.org.uk, (overview of Building Better Partnerships Report).
17. Joseph, E., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). 2001. Right up your street: Partnerships for local policy making and delivery. London: IPPR.
18. Kickert, W. 2003. Beyond public management. Public Management Review, 5(3): 377-400.
19. Klijn, E.-H., & Teisman, G. R. 2003. Institutional and strategic barriers to public-private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money & Management, 23(3): 137-147.
20. Koppenjan, J. 2005. The Formation of public-private partnerships: Lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 83(1): 135-157.
21. Lissauer, R., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). 2001. A learning process: Public private partnerships in education. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
22. Mott MacDonald. 2002. Review of large public procurement in the UK. London.
23. National Audit Office. 1998. The private finance initiative: The first four design, build, finance and operate roads contracts, HC 476, London.
24. National Audit Office. 2000a. Examining the value for money of deals under the private finance initiative. London.
25. National Audit Office. 2000b. The refinancing of the Fazakerley PFI, HC 584, London.
26. National Audit Office. 2001. Managing the relations to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects, a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 375, London.
27. National Audit Office. 2003. Managing resources to deliver better public services, HC 61-1, Session 2003-04, London.
28. Osborne, S. 2000. Public private partnerships: Theory and practice in international perspective. New York: Routledge.
29. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. 1993. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to state house. City Hall to Pentagon, New York: Plume.
30. Pollitt, M. G. 2002. The declining role of the state in infrastructure investment in the UK. In Berg, S., Pollitt, M., & Tsuji, M. (Eds.), Private initiatives in infrastructure: Priorities, incentives and performance. Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba: Japan External Trade Organization.
31. Pollock, A., Price, D., & Dunnigan, M. 2000. Deficits before patients: A report on the Worcestershire royal infirmary PFI and Worcestershire hospital configuration. London: University College.
32. Rosenau, P. V. 2000. Public-private policy partnerships. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.
33. Shaoul, J. 2005. A critical financial analysis of the private finance initiative: Selecting a financing method or reallocating economic wealth? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16: 441-471.
34. Todd, M., & Ware, P. 2000. Social care, contracts and voluntary sector providers: A view from the UK. International Journal of Public-Private Partnership, 2(2): 233-250.
35. Walker, B., & Walker, B.C. 2000. Privatization: Sell off or sell out? The Australian experience. Sydney: ABC Books.