Form, projection and pictures for the blind

Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 73-93

  Kennedy, John M ^a   Juricevic, Igor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947388107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410615671     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Albertazzi, L. (2002). Towards a neo-Aristotelean theory of continua. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua (pp. 29-79). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Arnheim, R. (1990) Perceptual aspects of art for the blind. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24, 57-65.
3. Cabe, P. A.,Wright, C.D.,&Wright,M. A. (2003). Descartes' blind man revisited: Bimanual triangulation of distance using static hand-held rods. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 71-98.
4. Cohen, L. G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Faiz, L., Dambrosia, J., Honda,M., Sadato, N., Gerloff, C. M., Catala, M. D., & Hallett, M. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389, 180-183.
5. Cox, M. (1992). Children's drawings. London: Penguin Books.
6. D'Angiulli, A.,Kennedy, J.M.,&Heller,M. A. (1998). Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 187-190.
7. Eriksson, Y. (1998).Tactile pictures: Pictorial representations for the blind 1784-1940. Göteborg: Göteborg University Press.
8. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-449.
10. Golomb, C. (2002). Child art in context: A cultural and comparative perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Goodale,M. A., James, T.W.,&Humphrey, G. K. (2002, October). Haptic recognition of geometrical object properties makes use of extra-striate visual areas. Paper presented at the conference on Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.
12. Heller,M. A.,&Kennedy, J.M. (1990). Perspective-taking, pictures and the blind. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 459-466.
13. Heller,M. A.,Wilson,K., Steffen,H., Yoneyama,K.,&Brackett,D.D. (2003). Superior haptic perceptual selectivity in late-blind and very-low-vision subjects. Perception, 32, 499-511.
14. Hernandez-Reif, M., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). The development of visual-tactile perception of objects: Amodalrelations provide the basis for learning arbitrary relations. Infancy, 2, 51-72.
15. Hopkins, R. (2003). Touching, seeing and appreciating pictures. In E. Axel & N. Levent (Eds.), Art beyond sight: A resource guide to art, creativity and visual impairment (pp. 186-199). New York: AFB Press.
16. Jansson, G. (2000). Spatial orientation and mobility of people with vision impairments. In B. Silverstone, M. A. Lang,B. P.Rosenthal, & E. E. Faye (Eds.), TheLighthousehandbookonvision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 359-375). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Jansson,G. (2001). The potential importance of perceptual filling-in for haptic perception of virtual object form. In C. Baber,M. Faint, S.Wall,&A.M.Wing (Eds.), Eurohaptics 2001 Conference Proceedings. EducationalTechnology Research Papers, 12, 72-75. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
18. Johnson K. O. (2001). The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 455-461.
19. Johnson,K.O. (2002, October). Neural mechanisms of tactile sensation. Paper presented at the conference on Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.
20. Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2002). Continuum of haptic space. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua (pp. 29-79). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Kennedy, J. M. (1974). A psychology of picture perception. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Drawing and the blind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Kennedy, J. M. (2003). Drawings from Gaia, a blind girl. Perception, 32, 321-340.
24. Kennedy, J.M.,&Bai, J. (2002). Haptic pictures: Fit judgments predict identification, recognition memory, and confidence. Perception, 31, 1013-1026.
25. Kennedy, J. M., & Bai, J. (2004). Border polarity matters for shape from shadow-not belongingness. Perception, 33, 653-665.
26. Kennedy, J. M., & Juricevic, I. (2002). Foreshortening gives way to forelengthening. Perception, 31, 893-894.
27. Kennedy J. M., & Juricevic, I. (2003). Haptics and projection: Drawings by Tracy, a blind adult. Perception, 32, 1059-1071.
28. Klatzky, R. L. (1999). Path completion after haptic exploration without vision: Implications for haptic spatial representation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 220-235.
29. Landerer, C. (2000). Kunstgeschichte als kognitiongeschichte: Ein beitrag zur genetischen kulturpsychologie [History of art as history of cognition: A contribution to genetic psychology]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Salzburg.
30. Lederman, S. J.,&Klatzky,R. L. (1987). Hand movements:Awindow into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342-368.
31. Lederman, S. J.,&Klatzky,R. L. (2002).Tactile object perception and the perceptual stream In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua (pp. 147-162). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
32. Lopes,D.M.M. (2003). Are pictures visual:Abrief history of an idea. In E.Axel&N. Levent (Eds.), Art beyond sight: A resource guide to art, creativity and visual impairment (pp. 176-185). New York: AFB Press.
33. Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children: Comparative studies of talent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Millar, S. (1994). Understanding and representing space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Millar, S. (2002, October). Spatial reference and coding haptic information: Implications for and from neuroscience. Paper presented at the conference on Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.
36. Mirabella,G.,&Kennedy, J.M. (1999). Which way is upright and normal? Haptic perception of letters above head level. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 909-918.
37. Nicholls, A., & Kennedy, J.M. (1992). Drawing development: From similarity of features to direction. Child Development, 63, 227-241.
38. Parks, T. E. (Ed.). (2001). Looking at looking. Sage: London.
39. Pascual-Leone, A., Theoret, H.,&Merabet, L. (2002, October). Tactile processing in the visual cortex. Paper presented at the conference on Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.
40. Petersen,M. E.,&Gibson,B. S. (1993). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: Which route counts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1075-1089.
41. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2003). Hearing colors, tasting shapes. Scientific American, 288(5), 52-59.
42. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibanez, V., Deiber, M-P., Dold, G.,&Hallett,M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526-528.
43. Sedgwick, H. A. (2003). Relating direct and indirect perception of spatial layout. In H. Hecht, R. Schwartz, & M. Atherton (Eds.), Looking into pictures: An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space (pp. 61-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Symmons, M., & Richardson, B. (2002, October). Active versus passive touch: Superiority depends more on the task than the mode. Paper presented at the conference on Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.
45. Willats, J. (2003). Optical laws or symbolic rules? The dual nature of pictorial systems. In H. Hecht, R. Schwartz, & M. Atherton (Eds.), Looking into pictures: An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space (pp. 125-143). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Zangaladze, A, Epstein, C. M., Grafton, S. T., & Sathian, K. (1999). Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature, 401, 587-590.