Feasibility study on petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse using submerged MBR

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 293, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 161-166

  Qin, Jian Jun ^a   Oo, Maung Htun ^a   Tao, Guihe ^a   Kekre, Kiran A ^a  

^a Singapore Utilities International Pte Ltd   (Singapore)

Author keywords

COD removal; Membrane bioreactor; Nitrification; Petrochemical wastewater; Water treatment and reuse

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; NITRIFICATION; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS (MBR); MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; PETROCHEMICAL WASTEWATER; VOLUME RATIO;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

WATER;

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; NITRIFICATION; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

AERATION; ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CLEANING; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOAMING; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NITRIFICATION; PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; TANK; WASTE WATER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER RECYCLING;

EID: 33947378805     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Gander M., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 18 (2000) 119-130
2. Lawrence P., Adham S., and Barrott L. Ensuring water re-use projects succeed-institutional and technical issues for treated water re-use. Desalination 152 (2002) 291-298
3. Stephenson T., Judd S., Jefferson B., and Brindle K. Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment (2001), IWA Publishing, Padstow, Cornwall, UK
4. Holler S., and Trosch W. Treatment of urban wastewater in a membrane bioreactor at high organic loading rates. J. Biotechnol. 92 (2001) 95-101
5. Fan X.J., Urbain V., Qian Y., and Manem J. Nitrification and mass balance with a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 34 (1996) 129-136
6. Ghyoot W., and Verstraete W. Reduced sludge production in a two stage membrane assisted bioreactor. Water Res. 34 (1999) 205-215
7. van der Roest H.F., van Bentem A.G.N., and Lawrence D.P. MBR-technology in municipal wastewater treatment: challenging the traditional treatment technologies. Water Sci. Technol. 46 (2002) 273-280
8. Yoon T.I., Lee H.S., and Kim C.G. Comparison of pilot scale performances between membrane bioreactor and hybrid conventional wastewater treatment systems. J. Membr. Sci. 242 (2004) 5-12
9. Tao G., Kiran K., Zhao W., Ting C.L., Bala V., and Seah H. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 51 (2005) 431-440
10. Qin J.-J., Kekre K.A., Tao G., Oo M.H., Wai M.N., Ting C.L., Viswanath B., and Seah H. New option of MBR-RO process for production of NEWater from domestic sewage. J. Membr. Sci. 272 (2006) 70-77
11. Rosenberger S., Kruger U., Witzig R., Manz W., Szewzyk U., and Kraume M. Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 36 (2002) 413-420
12. Mourato D., Thompson D., and Penny J. Immersed membrane bioreactor for wastewater reclamation and reuse. Membrane Technology for Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Conference. Tel Aviv, Israel, September 9-13 (2001)