Contested procedures: Ambiguities interstices and EU institutional change

West European Politics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 301-320

  Jupille, Joseph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN UNION; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; LEGISLATION;

EID: 33947375921     PISSN: 01402382     EISSN: 17439655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01402380701239756     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Banks, Karen (1993) 'L'article 118a: Élément dynamique de la politique sociale communautaire'. Cahiers de Droit Européen, 29:5, pp. 537-554.
2. Barents, René (1988) 'Hormones and the Growth of Community Agricultural Law: Some Reflections on the Hormones Judgment (Case 68/ 86)'. Legal Issues of European Integration, 1988:1, pp. 1-15.
3. Barents, René (1993) 'The Internal Market Unlimited: Some Observations on the Legal Basis of Community Legislation'. Common Market Law Review, 30:1, pp. 85-109.
4. Barnard, Catherine (1992) 'Where Politicians Fear to Tread?'. European Law Review, 17:2, pp. 127-133.
5. Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
6. Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D. and MacLeod, Michael C. (2000) 'The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions'. Journal of Politics, 62:2, pp. 321-349.
7. Bradley, Kieran St. C. (1988) 'The European Court and the Legal Basis of Community Legislation'. European Law Review, 13:6, pp. 379-402.
8. Burrows, Noreen (1997) 'Development Cooperation Defined'. European Law Review, 22, pp. 594-598.
9. Cullen, Holly and Charlesworth, Andrew (1999) 'Diplomacy by Other Means: The Use of Legal Basis Litigation as a Political Strategy by the European Parliament and Member States'. Common Market Law Review, 36, pp. 1243-1270.
10. Dubinsky, Paul R. (1994) 'The Essential Function of Federal Courts: The European Union and the United States Compared'. American Journal of Comparative Law, 42, pp. 295-346.
11. Farrell, Henry and Héritier, Adrienne (2003) 'Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe: Co-Decision and Informal and Formal Institutions'. Governance, 16:4, pp. 577-600.
12. Farrell, Henry and Héritier, Adrienne (2007) Codecision and Institutional Change. West European Politics, 30:2, pp. 285-300.
13. Franchino, Fabio (2002) 'Efficiency or Credibility? Testing the Two Logics of Delegation to the European Commission'. Journal of European Public Policy, 9:5, pp. 677-694.
14. Garrett, Geoffrey (1995) 'From the Luxembourg Compromise to Codecision: Decision Making in the European Union'. Electoral Studies, 14, pp. 289-308.
15. Garrett, Geoffrey and Tsebelis, George (1998) 'More on the Co-Decision Endgame'. Journal of Legislative Studies, 3:4, pp. 139-143.
16. Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, van Aken, Wim and Wallace, Helen (2005) 'When and Why the Council of Ministers of the EU Votes Explicitly'. Paper presented at Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association Austin, Texas
17. Hug, Simon and König, Thomas (2002) 'In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference'. International Organization, 56:2, pp. 447-476.
18. Jupille, Joseph (2004) Procedural Politics: Issues, Influence and Institutional Choice in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, New York
19. Kenner, Jeff (1997) 'A Distinctive Legal Base for Social Policy? The Court of Justice Answers a "Delicate Question"' European Law Review, 22, pp. 579-586.
20. King, David C. (1997) Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
21. König, Thomas and Pöter, Mirja (2001) 'Examining the EU Legislative Process'. European Union Politics, 2:3, pp. 329-352.
22. Kreppel, Amie (1999) 'What Affects the European Parliament's Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments'. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37:3, pp. 521-538.
23. Kreppel, Amie (2002) 'Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of EP Legislative Influence'. Comparative Political Studies, 35:7, pp. 784-813.
24. Kreppel, Amie (2002) The European Parliament and the Supranational Party System: A Study of Institutional Development, Cambridge University Press, New York
25. Lenaerts, Koen (1992) Some 'Thoughts about the Interaction Between Judges and Politicians in the European Community'. Yearbook of European Law, 12, pp. 1-34.
26. Maurer, Andreas (2001) 'Democratic Governance in the European Union: The Institutional Terrain after Amsterdam'. The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Union, Continuum, London
27. Maurer, A. Wessels, Wolfgang and Mittag, Jörgen (2000) 'Europeanisation in and of the EU System: Trends, Offers, and Constraints'. Paper presented at DFG Workshop 'Linking EU and National Governance' Mannheim
28. McCown, Margaret (2001) The Use of Judge-Made Law in European Judicial Integration: Precedent-Based Arguments in EU Inter-Institutional Disputes. Paper presented at Biennial Meetings of the European Community Studies Association Madison, Wisconsin
29. Menard, Scott (1995) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Moravcsik, Andrew (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
31. Soriano, Leonor Moral (2007) Vertical Juridical Disputes over Legal Bases. West European Politics, 30:2, pp. 321-337.
32. Moser, Peter (1996) 'The European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: What Are the Conditions?'. American Political Science Review, 90, pp. 834-838.
33. Moser, Peter (1997) A Theory of the Conditional Influence of the European Parliament in the Cooperation Procedure. Public Choice, 91, pp. 333-350.
34. Moser, Peter (1997) 'The Benefits of the Conciliation Procedure for the European Parliament: Comment to George Tsebelis'. Aussenwirtschaft, 52:1, pp. 257-262.
35. (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
36. O'Neill, Michael (1994) The Choice of Legal Basis: More than a Number. Irish Journal of European Law, 1, pp. 44-58.
37. Rasmussen, Anne (2007) 'Challenging the Commission's Right of Initiative? Conditions for Institutional Change and Stability'. West European Politics, 30:2, pp. 244-264.
38. Rhodes, Martin (1995) 'A Regulatory Conundrum: Industrial Relations and the Social Dimension'. European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, pp. 78-122. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
39. Rittberger, Berthold (2005) Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State, Oxford University Press, Oxford
40. Steunenberg, Bernard (1994) 'Decision Making Under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by the European Community'. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150:4, pp. 642-669.
41. Sweet, Alec Stone (2004) The Judicial Construction of Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford
42. Talbert, Jeffery C., Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank R. (1995) 'Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress'. American Journal of Political Science, 39:2, pp. 383-406.
43. Tsebelis, George (1994) 'The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter'. American Political Science Review, 88, pp. 128-142.
44. Tsebelis, George (1996) 'More on the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: Response to Moser'. American Political Science Review, 90, pp. 839-844.
45. Tsebelis, George (1997) 'Maastricht and the Democratic Deficit'. Aussenwirtschaft, 52:1, pp. 238-256.
46. Tsebelis, George and Garrett, Geoffrey (1997) 'Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union's Co-decision Procedure'. Journal of Legislative Studies, 3, pp. 74-92.
47. Tsebelis, George, Jensen, Christian B., Kalandrakis, Anastassios and Kreppel, Amie (2001) 'Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis'. British Journal of Political Science, 31, pp. 573-599.
48. Waddington, Lisa (1997) 'Towards a Healthier and More Secure European Social Policy? (Case Note C-84/94) YES'. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 4:1, pp. 83-100.