Index for assessing pedestrian safety at intersections

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1982, 2006, Pages 76-83

  Zegeer, Charles V ^a   Carter, Daniel L ^a   Hunter, William W ^a   Stewart, J Richard ^a   Huang, Herman ^b   Do, Ann ^c   Sandt, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Sprinkle Consulting Inc ^*  (United States)

^c Federal Highway Administration Virginia Division   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISION AVOIDANCE; DATA ACQUISITION; HAZARDS; INTERSECTIONS; MANEUVERABILITY; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CRASHES; INTERSECTION CROSSWALKS; VIDEO CLIPS;

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY;

EID: 33947369817     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1982-11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Traffic Safety Facts: 2003 Data. DOT HS 809 768 and DOT HS 809 769. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/ departments/nrd-30/ncsa/Availlnf.html. Accessed June 4, 2005.
2. Stutts, J. C., B. J. Campbell, and C. Martell. Trends Analysis of North Carolina Motor Vehicle Crash Data, 1974-1988. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill, 1990.
3. Stutts, J., and W. W. Hunter. Motor Vehicle and Roadway Factors in Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injuries: An Examination Based on Emergency Department Data, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1999, pp. 505-514.
4. Hunter, W., J. Stutts, W. Pein, and C. Cox. Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Types of the Early 1990's. Report No. FHWA-RD-95-163. FHWA, McLean, Va., June 1996.
5. Zegeer, C., I. Stutts, and W. Hunter. Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Volume VI. Compendium of Safety Effectiveness of Highway Design Features. Publication No. FHWA-RD-91-0049. FHWA, McLean, Va., 1991.
6. Zegeer, C. V., K. S. Opiela, and M. J. Cynecki. Pedestrian Signalization Alternatives. Report No. FHWA/RD-83/102. FHWA, McLean, Va., July 1985.
7. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, H. F. Huang, and P. Lagerwey. Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations - Executive Summary and Recommended Guidelines. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-075. FHWA, McLean, Va., April 2001.
8. 1,000 Friends of Oregon. Making the Land Use-Transportation-Air Quality Connection: Volume 4A, The Pedestrian Environment. Portland, Ore., 1993.
9. Identifying Priorities for Pedestrian Improvements. Portland Pedestrian Master Plan. City of Portland, Office of Transportation, Portland, Ore., June 1998. www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/Plans/ PedestrianmasterPlan/Chapter4.pdf. Accessed Sept. 29, 2004.
10. Dixon, L. Adopting Corridor-Specific Performance Measures for Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service. Transportation Planning, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1995, pp. 5-7.
11. Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, R. M. Ottenberg, D. S. McLeod, and M. Guttenplan. Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1773, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 82-88.
12. Warren, D., and G. Rousseau. Acceptable Speeds from the Pedestrian's Perspective. Presented at 72nd Annual Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Philadelphia, Pa., 2002.
13. Gallin, N. Quantifying Pedestrian Friendliness: Guidelines for Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service. Road and Transport Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2001.
14. Petritsch, T. A., B. W. Landis, P. S. McLeod, H. F. Huang, and S. Challa. Level-of-Service Model for Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1939, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
15. Harkey, D., and C. Zegeer. PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. Report No. FHWA-SA-04-003. FHWA, Washington, D.C., Sept. 2004. www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe. Accessed June 4, 2005.