PIER: Protein interface recognition for structural proteomics

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 400-417

  Kufareva, Irina ^a   Budagyan, Levon ^b   Raush, Eugene ^b   Totrov, Maxim ^b   Abagyan, Ruben ^a,b,c  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MOLSOFT LLC   (United States)

^c Mail TPC 28 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment independent interface prediction; Cell signaling and protein recognition; Protein protein interaction; Structural proteomics; Structure function annotation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN INTERFACE RECOGNITION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; DIMERIZATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 33947360625     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21233     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Szilagyi A, Grimm V, Arakaki AK, Skolnick J. Prediction of physical protein-protein interactions. Phys Biol 2005;2:S1-S16.
2. Valencia A, Pazos F. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:368-373.
3. Pagel P, Wong P, Frishman D. A domain interaction map based on phylogenetic profiling. J Mol Biol 2004;344:1331-1346.
4. Pagel P, Kovac S, Oesterheld M, Brauner B, Dunger-Kaltenbach I, Frishman G, Montrone C, Mark P, Stümpflen V, Mewes HW, Ruepp A, Frishman D. The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 2005;21:832-834.
5. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
6. Méndez R, Leplae R, Maria LD, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
7. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
8. Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:110-116.
9. Wodak SJ, Méndez R. Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:242-249.
10. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257:342-358.
11. Lichtarge O, Sowa ME. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:21-27.
12. Landgraf R, Xenarios I, Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J Mol Biol 2001;307:1487-1502.
13. Aloy P, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJ. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J Mol Biol 2001;311:395-408.
14. Armon A, Graur D, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J Mol Biol 2001;307:447-463.
15. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D, Martz E, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003;19:163-164.
16. Pupko T, Bell RE, Mayrose I, Glaser F, Ben-Tal N. Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues Bioinformatics 2002;18 (Suppl 1):71-77.
17. Bordner AJ, Abagyan R. REVCOM: a robust Bayesian method for evolutionary rate estimation. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2315-2321.
18. Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 2004;338:181-199.
19. Bordner AJ, Abagyan R. Statistical analysis and prediction of protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2005;60:353-366.
20. Bradford JR, Westhead DR. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1487-1494.
21. Koike A, Takagi T. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using support vector machines. Protein Eng Des Sel 2004;17:165-173.
22. Sen TZ, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, Yan C, Honavar V, Ho KM, Wang CZ, Ihm Y, Cao H, Gu X, Dobbs D. Predicting binding sites of hydrolase-inhibitor complexes by combining several methods. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:205-205.
23. Fariselli P, Pazos F, Valencia A, Casadio R. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. Eur J Biochem 2002;269:1356-1361.
24. Valdar WS, Thornton JM. Conservation helps to identify biologically relevant crystal contacts. J Mol Biol 2001;313:399-416.
25. Zhou HX, Shan Y. Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbor list. Proteins 2001;44:336-343.
26. Halperin I, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions; coupling of structurally conserved residues and of hot spots across interfaces. Implications for docking. Structure (Camb) 2004;12:1027-1038.
27. Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:5772-5777.
28. Valencia A, Pazos F. Prediction of protein-protein interactions from evolutionary information. Methods Biochem Anal 2003;44:411-426.
29. Aloy P, Russell RB. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5896-5901.
30. Bradford JR, Westhead DR. Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme-inhibitor interfaces: implications for the protein-protein docking problem. Protein Sci 2003;12:2099-2103.
31. Caffrey DR, Somaroo S, Hughes JD, Mintseris J, Huang ES. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? Protein Sci 2004;13:190-202.
32. Mintseris J, Weng Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:10930-10935.
33. Rost B, Valencia A. Pitfalls of protein sequence analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1996;7:457-461.
34. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 2001;307:1113-1143.
35. Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1995;2:171-178.
36. Mesa AdS, Pazos F, Valencia A. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J Mol Biol 2003;326:1289-1302.
37. Valdar WS. Scoring residue conservation. Proteins 2002;48:227-241.
38. Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J. A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2004;336:943-955.
39. Jones S, Thornton JM. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J Mol Biol 1997;272:121-132.
40. Larsen TA, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS. Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. Structure 1998;6:421-427.
41. Conte LL, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
42. MacCallum RM, Martin AC, Thornton JM. Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. J Mol Biol 1996;262:732-745.
43. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 2003;325:991-1018.
44. Ofran Y, Rost B. Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2003;325:377-387.
45. Rodier F, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Janin J. Hydration of protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2005;60:36-45.
46. Tsai CJ, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci 1997;6:53-64.
47. Young L, Jernigan RL, Covell DG. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci 1994;3:717-729.
48. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13-20.
49. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 2003;22:3486-3492.
50. Bogan AA, Thorn KS. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1998;280:1-9.
51. Clackson T, Wells JA. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 1995;267:383-386.
52. Rajamani D, Thiel S, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:11287-11292.
53. Jones S, Thornton JM. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol 1997;272:133-143.
54. Camacho CJ, Kimura SR, DeLisi C, Vajda S. Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding. Biophys J 2000;78:1094-1105.
55. Kortvelyesi T, Dennis S, Silberstein M, Brown L, Vajda S. Algorithms for computational solvent mapping of proteins. Proteins 2003;51:340-351.
56. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Skorodumov C, Abagyan R. Optimal docking area: a new method for predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Proteins 2005;58:134-143.
57. Keil M, Exner TE, Brickmann J. Pattern recognition strategies for molecular surfaces. III. Binding site prediction with a neural network. J Comput Chem 2004;25:779-789.
58. Geladi P, Kowalski B. Partial least squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 1986;185:1-17.
59. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
60. Shrake A, Rupley JA. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms: lysozyme and insulin. J Mol Biol 1973;79:351-357.
61. Abagyan RA, Totrov MM, Kuznetsov DA. ICM: a new method for structure modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J Comput Chem 1994;15:488-506.
62. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
63. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
64. Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Wu CH, Barker WC, Boeckmann B, Ferro S, Gasteiger E, Huang H, Lopez R, Magrane M, Martin MJ, Natale DA, O'Donovan C, Redaschi N, Yeh LS. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:154-159. Database issue.
65. Abagyan RA, Batalov S. Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J Mol Biol 1997;273:355-368.
66. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970;48:443-453.
67. Gonnet GH, Cohen MA, Benner SA. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science 1992;256:1443-1445.
68. Abagyan R. ICM Manual v. 3.1. 2005.
69. Chakrabarti P, Janin J. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 2002;47:334-343.
70. Glaser F, Steinberg DM, Vakser IA, Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2001;43:89-102.
71. Samanta U, Chakrabarti P. Assessing the role of tryptophan residues in the binding site. Protein Eng 2001;14:7-15.
72. Duan G, Smith VHJ, Weaver DF. Characterization of aromatic-thiol π-type hydrogen bonding and phenylalanine-cysteine side chain interactions through ab initio calculations and protein database analyses. Mol Phys 2001;99:1689-1699.
73. Pal D, Chakrabarti P. Non-hydrogen bond interactions involving the methionine sulfur atom. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2001;19:115-128.
74. Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J. Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins. Proteins 2003;53:708-719.
75. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
76. Bourne Y, Watson MH, Hickey MJ, Holmes W, Rocque W, Reed SI, Tainer JA. Crystal structure and mutational analysis of the human CDK2 kinase complex with cell cycle-regulatory protein CksHs1. Cell 1996;84:863-874.
77. Russo AA, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP. Structural basis of cyclin-dependent kinase activation by phosphorylation. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:696-700.
78. Borriello F, Krauter KS. Multiple murine α 1-protease inhibitor genes show unusual evolutionary divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:9417-9421.
79. Creighton TE, Darby NJ. Functional evolutionary divergence of proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors. Trends Biochem Sci 1989;14:319-324.
80. Rheaume C, Goodwin RL, Latimer JJ, Baumann H, Berger FG. Evolution of murine α 1-proteinase inhibitors: gene amplification and reactive center divergence. J Mol Evol 1994;38:121-131.
81. Goodwin RL, Baumann H, Berger FG. Patterns of divergence during evolution of α 1-proteinase inhibitors in mammals. Mol Biol Evol 1996;13:346-358.
82. Hill RE, Hastie ND. Accelerated evolution in the reactive centre regions of serine protease inhibitors. Nature 1987;326:96-99.
83. Méndez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
84. Henrick K, Thornton JM. PQS: a protein quaternary structure file server. Trends Biochem Sci 1998;23:358-361.
85. Ponstingl H, Henrick K, Thornton JM. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins 2000;41:47-57.
86. Schimmel P, Tao J, Hill J. Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases as targets for new anti-infectives. FASEB J 1998;12:1599-1609.
87. Qiu X, Janson CA, Smith WW, Green SM, McDevitt P, Johanson K, Carter P, Hibbs M, Lewis C, Chalker A, Fosberry A, Lalonde J, Berge J, Brown P, Houge-Frydrych CS, Jarvest RL. Crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase in complex with a class of potent and specific inhibitors. Protein Sci 2001;10:2008-2016.
88. Kobayashi T, Takimura T, Sekine R, Vincent K, Kamata K, Sakamoto K, Nishimura S, Yokoyama S. Structural snapshots of the KMSKS loop rearrangement for amino acid activation by bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. J Mol Biol 2005;346:105-117.
89. Herzberg O, Chen CC, Kapadia G, McGuire M, Carroll LJ, Noh SJ, Dunaway-Mariano D. Swiveling-domain mechanism for enzymatic phosphotransfer between remote reaction sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:2652-2657.