Port choice in a competitive environment: From the shipping lines' perspective

Applied Economics

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 477-492

  Tongzon, Jose L ^a   Sawant, Lavina ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOBALIZATION; MONOPOLY; PORT OPERATION; SHIPPING;

ASIA; EURASIA; MALAYSIA; SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA]; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 33947354484     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500438871     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baird, A. (1996) Containerisation and the decline of the upstream urban port in Europe. Maritime policy and Management, 23, pp. 145-156.
2. Brooks, MR (1985) An alternative theoretical approach to the evaluation of liner shipping (Part 2, Choice Criteria). Maritime Policy and Management, 12, pp. 145-155.
3. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. and Price, B. (2000) Regression Analysis by Example, Wiley, New York
4. Containerisation International (News), June (2002)
5. Fleming, D. and Hayuth, Y. (1994) Spacial characteristics of transportation hubs: Centrality and intermediacy. Journal of Transport Geography, 2, pp. 3-18.
6. Fung, K-F (2001) Competition between the ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: A structural vector error correction model to forecast the demand for container handling services. Maritime Policy and Management, 28, pp. 3-22.
7. Gray, R. (1982) Behavioural approaches to freight transport modal choice. Transport Reviews, 2, pp. 161-184.
8. Hosmer, D. and Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York; Singapore
9. Jerman, R., Anderson, R. and Constantin, James (1978) Shipper Vs Carrier perceptions of carrier selection variables. International Journal of Physical Distribution, 9, pp. 29-38.
10. Marr, N. (1980) Do managers really know what service their customers require?. International journal of physical distribution, 10, pp. 433-444.
11. Maritime, P. (2003) Authority press release, Singapore
12. McGinnis, M. (1980) Shipper attitude towards Freight Transportation choice: A factor analytic study. International Journal of Physical Distribution, 10, pp. 25-34.
13. Menard, S. (2001) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Meyrick, S. and D'este, G. (1989) More than the bottom line-how users select a shipping service. Proceedings of the 14th Australian Transport Research Forum, pp. 65-81. Perth, Australia
15. Notteboom, T. and Winkelmans, W. (2001) Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?. Maritime Policy and Management, 28, pp. 71-89.
16. Notteboom, T., Coeck, C. and Broeck, J van den (2000) Measuring and explaining the relative efficiency of container terminals by means of Bayesian Stochastic Frontier models. International journal of Maritime Economics, 2, pp. 83-106.
17. Schaller, B. (1999) Enhancing Transit's Competitiveness: A Survey Methodology
18. Slack, B. (1993) Pawns in the Game: Ports in a global transportation system. Growth and change, 24, pp. 579-588.
19. Tabernacle, J. (1995) A study of the changes in performance of quayside container cranes. Maritime Policy and Management, 22, pp. 115-124.
20. Tongzon, J. (1994) Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research-A, 29, pp. 245-252.
21. Tongzon, J. (2002) Department of Economics, National University of Singapore
22. (2023) NOL hopes to finish talks on PSA terminal deal soon. The Shipping Times
23. (2026) Pelepas will handle 10m containers by 2005: Dr M. The Shipping Times
24. (2003) Connectivity counts. The Shipping Times
25. (2019) Port Klang's $461.6m growth plan. The New Paper
26. (2019) Job cuts at PSA, Don't blame us: Tanjung Pelepas port. The Straits Times
27. (2022) PSA needs to slim down so it won't go under water. The Straits Times