The influence of context on lifeline behavior: Local policies under wind storm and earthquake scenarios

Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 5: Water Pollution

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 289-307

  Reed, Dorothy ^a   Preuss, Jane ^a   Park, Jaewook ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b GeoEngineers Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Lifeline behavior; Local policies; Wind storm

Indexed keywords

HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; NATURAL HAZARD; SEISMIC HAZARD; STORM; WIND FORCING;

EID: 33947327031     PISSN: 14336863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-006-0029-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Anagnos T (1999) Improvement of fragilities for electrical substation equipment. In: Elliott W, McDonough P (eds) Proceedings of the fifth US conference on lifeline earthquake engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 673-682
2. ATC (Applied Technology Council) (1991) Seismic vulnerability and impact of disruption of lifelines in the conterminous United States. In: ATC-25, Redwood City, California
3. Arcview GIS software (http://www.esri.com/software/arcview/)
4. Brown RE, Gupta S, Christie RD, Venkata SS, Fletcher R (1997a) Automated primary distribution system design: Reliability and cost optimization. In: IEEE trans. on power delivery
5. Brown RE, Gupta S, Christie RD, Venkata SS, Fletcher R (1997b) Distribution system reliability assessment: Momentary interruptions and storms. In: IEEE trans. on power delivery
6. Brown RE, Gupta S, Christie RD, Venkata SS, Fletcher R (1997c) Distribution system reliability assessment using hierarchical markov modeling. In: IEEE trans. on power delivery
7. Chang S (1998) Direct economic impacts. In: Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes: An analysis of electricity lifeline disruptions in the New Madrid area. MCEER, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, pp 75-94
8. Davidson RA, Liu H, Sarpong IK, Sparks P, Rosowsky DV (2003) In: Natural hazards review, Feb., pp 36-45
9. Department of Earth and Spaces Science at the University of Washington (http://www.ess.washington.edu/shake/)
10. Distribution System Reliability (2002) In: Seattle City Light, Distribution Branch Report, Jan. 23, 2002. Seattle, WA
11. Dobson I, Newman DE, Carreras BA, Lynch VE (2002) An initial complex systems analysis of the risks of blackouts in power transmission systems. In:PCRIS proceedings: power systems and communications infrastructures for the future, Beijing, September
12. FEMA (2000) HAZUS-99, Service Release 2. (http://www.fema.gov/hazus)
13. Hertzberg R (1989) Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials, 3rd edn. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, Wiley series in probability and statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY, p 375
15. Hosoya H (1971) Topological index: A newly proposed quantity characterizing the topological nature of structural isomers of saturated hydrocarbons. In: Bulletin of Chemical Society of Japan, vol 44, pp 2332-2339
16. Hwang HHM, Huo J-R (1995) Seismic performance evaluation of substation structures. In: O'Rourke MJ (ed) Lifeline earthquake engineering: proceedings of the fourth U.S. conference; San Francisco, California, August 10-12, 1995, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Monograph No. 6, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York
17. IEEE Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices, IEEE Standard 1366, 2001 edn
18. Leet K (1982) Reinforced concrete design, Chapter 3. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
19. Meszaros J, Fiegener M (2002) Effects of the 2001 Nisqually earthquake on small businesses in Washington State, Report prepared for the economic development administration, US Department of Commerce, October
20. Nojima N, Sugito M (2002) Empirical estimation of outage and duration of lifeline disruption due to earthquake disaster. In: Proc. of the Fourth China-Japan-U.S. Trilateral Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Quindao, China, November, pp 349-356
21. Okada N (2002) Presentation at the Japan-US Workshop, Kyoto, Japan, October
22. Okada N, Sakakibara H, Kajitani Y (2001) Modeling, urban diagnosis ad policy analysis for integrated disaster risk management - illustrations by use of DiMSIS, Niche analysis and topological index. In: Proceedings of the Japan-US workshop on disaster risk management for urban infrastructure systems, Kyoto, Japan, May 14-16, pp 15-39
23. O'Rourke TD, Jeon SS, Eguchi RT, Huyck CK (2001) Advanced GIS for loss estimation and rapid post-earthquake assessment of building damage. In: MCEER research progress and accomplishments 2000-2001 (http://www.mceer.buffalo.edu/)
24. Petak WJ (2003) Earthquake mitigation implementation: A sociotechnical systems approach, presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 6th February
25. Phadke A (2002) Keynote address, power systems and communications infrastructures for the future, Beijing, September
26. Ranf R, Tyler MO, Eberhard, Berry MP (2001) Damage to bridges during the 2001 Nisqually earthquake, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER-2001-15, University of California, Berkeley, November
27. Reed DA, Cook C (1999) Multi-hazard analysis of utility lifelines. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on wind engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark, June
28. Reed DA, Preuss J, Park J (2002a) Empirical investigation of utility lifeline restoration for earthquake and wind hazards. In: Proceedings of the hazards 2002, Antalya, Turkey, Oct. 2-6
29. Reed DA, Preuss J, Park J (2002b) Distribution system disruption and recovery for natural hazards. In: Proceedings of the power systems and communications infrastructures for the future, Beijing, PRC, September
30. Schaffer JP, Saxena A, Antolovich SD, Sanders TH Jr, Warner SB (1995) The science and design of engineering materials. Irwin, Chicago, IL
31. Schiff A (1998) Electric power. In: Schiff A (ed) Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake of January 17, 1995 lifeline performance, technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering, monograph no. 14, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, September 1998
32. SEI/ASCE 7-02 (2002) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE Publications.
33. Shinozuka M (2002) Presentation at the Japan-US workshop, Kyoto, Japan, October. S-Plus statistical analysis software (http://www.spss.com)
34. Tanner CD (1991) Potential intertidal habitat restoration sites in the Duwamish river estuary, EPA 910/9-91-050. Final report prepared for the US EPA and Port of Seattle. Seattle, WA. 93 p. + appendices
35. Tong H, Yamazaki F (1996) Relationship between Ground Motion Indices and New JMA Seismic Intensity. Seisan-Kenjyu 48 (11): 31-34 (in Japanese)
36. Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and modified mercalli intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15 (3): 557-564
37. Werner S.D., Taylor C. (2001) Component vulnerability modeling issues for analysis of seismic risks to transportation lifeline systems. In: Taylor C, Vanmarcke E (eds.) Acceptable risk processes: Lifelines and natural hazards, ASCE Press, Monograph No. 21
38. Yamaguchi N, Yanazaki F (1999) Estimation of strong ground motion in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake based on building damage data. In: Journal of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, No. 612/I-46, pp 325-335