Patient reported outcomes: Cinderella subject, no more

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 501-502

  Cuschieri, Alfred ^a  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; LIFE SATISFACTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WELLBEING;

EID: 33947317280     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9254-4     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Korolija D (2007) Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they? Surg Endosc 21: 503-507
2. http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/QUALITY_OF_LIFE.pdf
3. Bruera E (2006) Poor correlation between physician and patient assessment of quality of life in palliative care. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 3: 592-593
4. Leidy NK, Beusterien K, Sullivan E, Richner R, Muni NI (2006) Integrating the patient's perspective into device evaluation trials. Value Health 9: 394-401
5. http://www.isoqol.org/