Soil alleviation in direct drilling systems: Effect on soil physical properties and maize crop;Descompactación de suelos en siembra directa: Efectos sobre las propiedades físicas y el cultivo de maíz

Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 5: Water Pollution

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-10

  Álvarez, Carina Rosa ^a   Taboada, Miguel Angel ^a   Bustingorri, Carolina ^a   Gutiérrez Boem, Flavio Hernán ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Direct drilling; Maize; Root growth; Soil alleviation; Yield

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; DIRECT DRILLING; INFILTRATION; MAIZE; SOIL MANAGEMENT; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL WATER; TILLAGE;

JUNIN; PERU; SOUTH AMERICA;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33947312628     PISSN: 14336863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allison, LE. 1965. Organic carbon. Pp. 1367-1378 In: CA Black (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis (Part 2) Chemical and Microbiological Properties. America Society of Agronomy Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
2. Álvarez, CR; FH Gutierrez Boem; MA Taboada; P Prystupa; JF Ocampo et al. 2004. Propiedades físicas, químicas y biológicas del suelo bajo distintos manejos en el norte de Buenos Aires. Pp.238. Actas XIX Congreso Argentino de la Ciencia del suelo. Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
3. Álvarez, R. 2001. Estimation of carbon losses by cultivation from soils of the Argentine Pampa using the Century Model. Soil Use Manag. 17(2):62-66.
4. ASAE. 1992. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards. ASAE Editions (eds). StJoseph, MI, USA. 781 pp.
5. ASTM. 1982. Standard test methods for moisture relations using a 5.5 lb (2,5 kg) hammer and 12 inch (304,8 mm) drop. Pp. 836-842. In: ASTM (ed.), ASTM Standards in Building Codes. Philadelphia, USA.
6. Boone, FR; KH van der Werf; B Kroesbergen; BA ten Hag & A Boers. 1986. The effect of compaction of the arable layer in sandy soil on the growth of maize for silage. I. Mechanical impedance. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 34: 155-171.
7. Botta, GF; D Jorajuria; R Balbuena & H Rosatto. 2004. Mechanical and cropping behaviour of direct drilled soil under different traffic intensities: effect on soybean (Glycine max L.) yields. Soil Till. Res. 78(1):53-78.
8. Botta, GF; D Jorajuria; H Rosatto & C Ferrero. 2006. Light tractor traffic frequency on soil compaction in the Rolling Pampa region of Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 86(1):9-14.
9. Burke, W; D Gabriels & J Bouma (eds). 1986. Soil structure assessment. AA Balkema. Rotterdam, Netherlands. 92 pp.
10. Carter, MR; DA Holstrom; LM Cochrane; PC Brenton; JA van Roestel. et al. 1996. Persistence of deep loosening of natural compacted subsoils in Nova Scotia. Can. J. Soil Sci. 76(4): 541-547.
11. Carter, MR. 1990. Relative measures of soil bulk density to characterize compaction in tillage studies on fine sandy loams. Can. J. Soil Sci. 70:425-433.
12. Dardanelli, JL; MA Calmon; JW Jones; MP Andriani; MP Díaz & DJ Collino. 2003. Use of a crop model to evaluate soil impedance and root clumping effects on soil water extraction in three argentine soils. Trans. ASAE 46:1265-1275.
13. Díaz-Zorita, M. 2000. Effect of deep-tillage and nitrogen fertilization interactions on dryland corn (Zea mays L.) productivity. Soil Till. Res. 54(1):11-19.
14. Díaz-Zorita, M; GA Duarte & JH Grove. 2002. A review of no-till systems and soil management for sustainable crop production in the subhumid and semiarid Pampas of Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 65 (1):1-18.
15. Erbach, DC; RM Cruse; TM Crosbie; DR Timmons; TC Kaspar & KN Potter. 1986. Maize response to tillage-induced soil conditions. Trans. ASAE 29:690-695.
16. Gee, GW & D Or. 2002. Particle-Size Analysis. Chapter 2.4. Pp. 255-293. In: JH Dane & GC Topp (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4: Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
17. Gibbs, RJ & JB Reid. 1988. A conceptual model of changes in soil structure under different cropping systems. Adv. Soil Sci. 8:123-149.
18. Glinski, J & J Lipiec. 1990. Soil Physical Conditions and Plant Roots. CRC Press Inc. Boca Ratón, Florida, USA. 250 pp.
19. Gupta, SC & RR Allmaras. 1987. Models to assess the susceptibility of soils to excessive compaction. Adv. Soil Sci. 6:65-100.
20. Hamilton-Manns, M; CW Ross; DJ Horne & CJ Baker. 2002. Subsoil loosening does little to enhance the transition to no-tillage on a structurally degraded soil. Soil Till. Res. 68 (2):109-119.
21. Hamza, MA & WK Anderson. 2003. Responses of soil properties and grain yields to deep ripping and gypsum application on a compacted loamy sand soil contrasting with a sandy clay loam soil in Western Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 54(3):273-282.
22. Hussain, I; KR Olson; MM Wander & DL Karlen. 1999. Adaptation of soil quality indices and application to three tillage systems in southern Illinois. Soil Till. Res. 50(3&4): 237-249.
23. INDEC. 2005. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. www.indec.gov.ar.
24. Kay, BD. 1990. Rates of change of soil structure under different cropping systems. Adv. Soil Sci. 12:1-52.
25. Kuehl, RO. 1994. Diagnosing agreement between the data and the model. Chapter 4. Pp: 108-128. In: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press. California, USA.
26. Logsdon, SD; TC Kaspar & CA Cambardella. 1999. Depth-incremental properties under no-till or chisel management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63(1):197-200.
27. Manichon, H. 1987. Observation morphologique de l'état structural et mise en évidence d'effects de compactage des horizons travaillés. Pp: 145-155. In: G Monnier & MJ Goss (eds). Soil Compaction and Regeneration. AA Balkema. Rotterdam, Netherlands.
28. Michelena, RO; CB Irurtia; A Pittaluga; F Vavruska & ME de Sardi. 1988. Degradación de los suelos en el sector norte de la Pampa Ondulada. Ci. Suelo 6:60-66.
29. Micucci, FG & MA Taboada. 2006. Soil physical properties and soybean (Glycine max, Merrill) root abundance in conventionally- and zero-tilled soils in the humid Pampas of Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 86(2):152-162.
30. Petersen, RG. 1994, Combined analysis of several experiments. Chapter 6 Pp. 205-391. In: RG Petersen (ed.). Agricultural Field Experiments. Design and Analysis. Marcel Dekker. New York, USA. 409 pp.
31. Sadras, VO; GJ O'Leary & DK Roget. 2005. Crop responses to compacted soil: capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation. Field Crops Res. 91(2&3):131-148.
32. Sadras, VO & PA Calviño. 2001. Quantification of grain yield response to soil depth in soybean, maize, sunflower, and wheat. Agron. J. 93(3):577-583.
33. SAGyP-CFA. 1995. La Degradación de las tierras en la República Argentina. Alerta Amarillo. SAGyP. Buenos Aires. Argentina. 287 pp.
34. Salazar, Lea; JC Plaza & G Moscatelli. 1989.Mapa de Suelos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Escala 1:500.000. SAGyP - INTA. Buenos Aires. Argentina. 527 pp.
35. USDA. 1999. Soil Quality Test Kit Guide. USDA-Agriculture Research Service. SCS. USA. 82 pp.
36. Voorhees, WB; DA Farell & WE Larson. 1975. Soil strength and aeration effects on root elongation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39:948-953.