Effects of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on haemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation: A comparative study

Clinical Drug Investigation

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 269-277

  Ugur, Bakiye ^a   Ogurlu, Mustafa ^a   Gezer, Erdal ^a   Aydin, Osman Nuri ^a   Gürsoy, Feray ^a  

^a ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESMOLOL; FENTANYL; LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG MECHANISM; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TACHYCARDIA;

BLOOD PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FENTANYL; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LIDOCAINE; PROPANOLAMINES;

EID: 33947302241     PISSN: 11732563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727040-00006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kayhan Z. Endotrakeal entubasyon: klinik anestezi. 1st ed. Istanbul: Logos yayincilik, 2004
2. Larson CP. Airway controls. In: Morgan GE, Michael SM, Murray JM, et al., editors. Clinical anesthesiology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002: 50-72
3. Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation: direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 132-6
4. Kumar S, Mishra MN, Mishra LS, et al. Comparative study of the efficacy of i.v. esmolol, diltiazem and magnesium sulphate in attenuating haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Indian J Anaesth 2003; 47: 41-4
5. Kim NS, Lee IO, Lee MK, et al. The effects of beta2 adrenoreceptor gene polymorphisms on pressor response during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 227-32
6. Tan PH, Yang LC, Shih HC, et al. Combined use of esmolol and nicardipine to blunt the haemodynamic changes following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 1195-212
7. Bedford RF, Marshall WK. Cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation during four anesthetic techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1984; 28: 563-6
8. Foex P, Sear JW. The surgical hypertensive patient: continuing education in anaesthesia. Cont Education Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2004; 4: 139-43
9. Roy WL, Edelist G, Gilbert B. Myocardial ischemia during non-cardiac surgical procedures in patients with coronary-artery disease. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: 393-7
10. Thomson IR. The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36: 367-9
11. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, et al. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47: 524-5
12. Kaplan JA. Hemodynamic monitoring. In: Reich DL, Kaplan JA, editors. Cardiac anesthesia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders, 1987: 261-98
13. Hagberg J, Boin MH. Management of the airway: complications. In: Benumof JL, Saidman LJ, editors. Anesthesia and perioperative complications. 2nd ed. St Louis (MO): Mosby Inc., 1999: 4-14
14. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Opioids. In: Handbook of clinical anesthesia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Raven 1997: 115-27
15. Reves JG. Local anesthetics. In: Morgan GE, Michael SM, Murray JM, et al., editors. Clinical anesthesiology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002: 193-200
16. Sintetos AL, Hulse J, Pritchett EL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esmolol administered as an intravenous bolus. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41: 112-7
17. Messerli FH. Cardiovascular drug therapy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders, 1996
18. Rathore AS, Gupta HK, Tanwar GL, et al. Attenuation of the pressure response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with different doses of esmolol. Indian J Anaesth 2002; 46: 449-52
19. Zalunardo MP, Zollinger A, Szelloe P, et al. Cardiovascular stress protection following anesthesia induction: comparison of clonidine and esmolol. Anaesthesist 2001; 50: 21-5
20. Korpinen R, Simola M, Saarnivaara L. Effect of esmolol on the hemodynamic and electrocardiographic changes during laryngomicroscopy under propofol-alfentanil anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1998; 49: 123-32
21. Singh H, Vichitvejpaisal P, Gaines GY, et al. Comparative effects of lidocaine, esmolol, and nitroglycerin in modifying the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 5-8
22. Ebert TJ, Bernstein JS, Stowe DF, et al. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction and intubation in healthy patients with a single bolus of esmolol. J Clin Anesth 1990; 2: 243-52
23. Parnass SM, Rothenberg DM, Kerchberger JP, et al. A single bolus dose of esmolol in the prevention of intubation-induced tachycardia and hypertension in an ambulatory surgery unit. J Clin Anesth 1990; 2: 232-7
24. Bensky KP, Donahue-Spencer L, Hertz GE, et al. The dose-related effects of bolus esmolol on heart rate and blood pressure following laryngoscopy and intubation. AANA J 2000; 68: 437-42
25. Abou-Madi MN, Keszler H, Yacoub JM. Cardiovascular reactions to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation following small and large intravenous doses of lidocaine. Can Anesth Soc J 1977; 24: 12-9
26. Splinter WM, Cervenko F. Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in geriatric patients: effects of fentanyl, lidocaine and thiopentone. Can J Anesth 1989; 36: 370-6
27. Himes RS, DiFazio CA, Burney RG. Effects of lidocaine on the anesthetic requirements for nitrous oxide and halothane. Anesthesiology 1977; 47: 437-40
28. Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisser EA, et al. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol? Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 482-6
29. Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Marving J, et al. Lack of effect of intravenous lidocaine on hemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia: a double-blind controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 1037-41
30. Pathak D, Slater RM, Ping SS, et al. Effects of alfentanil and lidocaine on the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1990; 2: 81-5
31. Miller CD, Warren SJ. IV lignocaine fails to attenuate the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 216-9
32. Tam S, Chung F, Campbell M. Intravenous lidocaine: optimal time of injection before tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 1036-8
33. Samaha T, Ravussin P, Claquin C, et al. Prevention of increase of blood pressure and intracranial pressure during endotracheal intubation in neurosurgery: esmolol versus lidocaine. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1996; 15: 36-40
34. Dahlgren N, Messeter K. Treatment of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation with fentanyl. Anaesthesia 1981; 36: 1022-6
35. Kautto UM. Attenuation of the circulatory response to laryngoscopy and intubation by fentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1982; 26: 217-21
36. Chung F, Evans D. Low-dose fentanyl: haemodynamic response during induction and intubation in geriatric patients. Can Anesth Soc J 1985; 32: 622-8
37. Martin DE, Rosenberg H, Aukburg SJ, et al. Low-dose fentanyl blunts circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1982; 61: 680-4
38. Adachi YU, Satomoto M, Higuchi H, et al. Fentanyl attenuates the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation more than the response to laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 233-7
39. Feng CK, Chan KH, Liu KN, et al. A comparison of lidocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1996; 34: 61-7
40. Reich DL, Moskowitz DM, Kaplan JA. Hemodynamic monitoring. In: Kaplan JA, Reich DL, Konstadt SN, editors. Cardiac anaesthesia. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders, 1999: 321-400