Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

Nature Clinical Practice Urology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 140-146

  Novara, Giacomo ^a   Galfano, Antonio ^a   De Marco, Vincenzo ^a   Artibani, Walter ^a   Ficarra, Vincenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GELATINASE A; GELATINASE B; PROTEIN P53; UVOMORULIN;

CANCER GRADING; CANCER INFILTRATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; EUROPE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; PENIS AMPUTATION; PENIS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; UNITED STATES;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; PENILE NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 33947265643     PISSN: 17434270     EISSN: 17434289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0751     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Mobilio G et al. (2001) Genital treatment of penile carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 11: 299-304
2. Jemal A et al. (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56: 106-130
3. Misra S et al. (2004) Penile carcinoma: A challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol 5: 240-247
4. Busby JE et al. (2005) What's new in the management of penile cancer? Curr Opin Urol 15: 350-357
5. Lont AP et al. (2006) Presence of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA in penile carcinoma predicts favorable outcome in survival. Int J Cancer 119: 1078-1081
6. Kroon BK et al. (2005) Contemporary management of penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 89: 43-50
7. Fraley EE et al. (1989) The role of ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy and significance of histological differentiation in treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 142: 1478-1482
8. McDougal WS (1995) Carcinoma of the penis: Improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 154: 1364-1366
9. Lopes A et al. (1996) Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156: 1637-1642
10. Slaton JW et al. (2001) Tumor stage, vascular invasion and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: Independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squannous cancer. J Urol 165: 1138-1142
11. Solsona E et al. (1992) Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 22: 115-118
12. Solsona E et al. (2001) Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urol 165: 506-1509
13. Solsona E et al. (2004) EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 46: 1-8
14. Ficarra V et al. (2005) Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Cancer 103: 2507-2516
15. Ficarra V et al. (2006) Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 175: 1700-1705
16. Horenblas S et al. (1993) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes. J Urol 149: 492-497
17. Horenblas S et al. (1994) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: Analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urol 151: 1239-1243
18. Bezerra ALR et al. (2001) Human papillomavinus as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the penis analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. Cancer 91: 2315-2321
19. Kattan MW et al. (2006) Nomogram predictive of cancer specific survival in patients undergoing partial or total amputation for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 175: 2103-2108
20. Villavicencio H et al. (1997) Grade, local stage and growth pattern as prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol 32: 442-447
21. Lopes A et al. (2002) p53 as a now prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma: Analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. J Urol 168: 81-86
22. Campos RS et al. (2006) E-cadherin, MMP-2, and MMP-9 as prognostic markers in penile cancer: Analysis of 125 patients. Urology 67: 797-802
23. Kamat MR et al. (1993). Carcinoma of the penis: The Indian experience. J Surg Oncol 52: 50-55
24. Kulkarni JN et al. (1994) Prophylactic bilateral groin node dissection versus prophylactic radiotherapy and surveillance in patients with N0 and N1 ± 2 carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol 26: 123-128
25. Srinivas V et al. (1987) Penile cancer: Relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival. J Urol 137: 880-882
26. Ornellas AA et al. (1991) Analyses of 200 lymphadenectomies in patients with penile carcinoma. J Urol 146: 330-332
27. Ravi R (1993) Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol 72: 941-945
28. Brkovic D et al. (1997) Surgical treatment of invasive penile cancer - the Heidelberg experience from 1968 to 1994. Eur Urol 31: 339-342