Conformational equilibria in formic acid and the adduct of formic acid and hexafluoroacetone, HCO2C(CF3)2OH

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2003-2007

  Pawar, Diwakar M ^a   Cain Davis, Dalephine ^a   Noe, Eric A ^a  

^a JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; CONFORMATIONS; FREE ENERGY; HYDROGEN BONDS; LOW TEMPERATURE OPERATIONS; SOLVENTS;

CONFORMATIONAL EQUILIBRIA; DIMETHYL ETHER; HEXAFLUOROACETONE; HYDROGEN BOND ACCEPTORS;

FORMIC ACID;

DIMETHYL ETHER; FORMIC ACID; HEXAFLUOROACETONE; METHYL GROUP; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONFORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; ISOMER; LOW TEMPERATURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

ACETONE; FLUOROCARBONS; FORMIC ACIDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; SOLVENTS; STEREOISOMERISM; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 33947258537     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo061697v     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. For example, see: Pawar, D. M.; Khalil, A. A.; Hooks, D. R.; Collins, K.; Elliott, T.; Stafford, J.; Smith, L.; Noe, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2108 and references cited therein.
2. Noe, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 2803.
3. Kalinowski, H. O.; Hocking, W. H.; Winnewisser, B. P. J. Chem. Res. 1978, 7, 260.
4. Minary, P.; Jedlovszky, P.; Mezei, M.; Turi, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 8287.
5. An earlier structural investigation of formic acid by X-ray and neutron diffraction and reverse Monte-Carlo study found that no significant amount of cyclic hydrogen bonded dimer was present. Jedlovszky, P.; Bako, I.; Palinkas; Dore, J. C. Mol. Phys. 1995, 86, 87.
6. Kim, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1522.
7. Nahringbauer, I. Acta Crystallogr. 1978, B34, 315.
8. Meier, B. H.; Graf, F.; Earnst, R. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 767.
9. Golubev, N. S.; Denisov, G. S.; Koltsov, A. I. J. Mol. Struct. 1981, 75, 333.
10. Noe, E. A.; Raban, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5811.
11. Hocking, W. H. Z. Naturforsch. A 1976, 31, 1113.
12. Wiberg, K. B.; Laidig, K. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5935.
13. Grindley, T. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 1757.
14. Wiberg, K. B.; Wong, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1078.
15. Golubev, N. S.; Pushkareva, E. G. Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 4, Fiz., Khim. 1985, 2, 87.
16. Langley, C. H.; Pawar, D. M.; Noe, E. A. THEOCHEM 2005, 732, 99.
17. Pawar, D. M.; Sims, Y. S.; Moton, D. M.; Noe, E. A. THEOCHEM 2003, 626, 159.
18. 18 have shown that this is not always valid, and have described two examples for which this assumption leads to the wrong conclusion. However, the relationship was described as applicable to esters.
19. Perrin, C. L.; Young, D. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7185.
20. Calculated spectra were obtained with the program DNMR-SIM written by G. Hegele and R. Fuhler; Heinrich-Hein University, Dusseldorf Institute of Inorganic and Structural Chemistry: Dusseldorf, FRG, 1994.
21. Cain, D.; Pawar, D. M.; Stewart, M.; Billings, H., Jr.; Noe, E. A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6092.
22. The temperatures for this experiment were not calibrated promptly after the spectra were taken, and were estimated from many other calibrations. The error limits (ca. ±5 °C) are larger than those for the other spectra.