|
Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 12-15
|
Is risky pediatric research without prospect of direct benefit ever justified?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BRAIN;
CHILD;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
EMBRYONIC STEM CELL;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
JUVENILE;
NERVE CELL;
NEURONAL CEROID LIPOFUSCINOSIS;
NOTE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;
TRANSPLANTATION;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
BRAIN;
CHILD;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
MINORS;
NEURONAL CEROID-LIPOFUSCINOSES;
NEURONS;
NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
EID: 33947244966
PISSN: 15265161
EISSN: 15360075
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/15265160601171606 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (13)
|
References (12)
|