Prostate Biopsy: Past, Present, and Future

Urology

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 413-416

  Silletti, Joseph P ^a   Gordon, Gavin J ^a   Bueno, Raphael ^a   Jaklitsch, Michael ^a   Loughlin, Kevin R ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW;

BIOPSY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33947240796     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.096     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC. Fact Sheet: Prostate Cancer: The Public Health Perspective (2003)
2. Young H.H., and Davis D.M. Young's Practice of Urology vol 2 (1926), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 414-512
3. Ferguson R.S. Prostatic neoplasms: their diagnosis by needle puncture and aspiration. Am J Surg 9 (1930) 507-511
4. Bianchi F. Practical advantages of the perineal biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 76 (1956) 645-650
5. Parry W.L., and Finelli J.F. Biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 84 (1960) 643-648
6. Astraldi A. Diagnosis of cancer of the prostate: biopsy by rectal route. Urol Cutan Rev 41 (1937) 421-427
7. Colby F.H. Carcinoma of the prostate: results of the total prostatectomy. J Urol 69 (1953) 797-806
8. Weaver R.P., Noble M.J., and Weigle J.W. Correlation of ultrasound guided and digitally directed transrectal biopsies of palpable prostatic abnormalities. J Urol 145 (1991) 516-518
9. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M.K., et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142 (1989) 71-74
10. Levine M.A., Ittman M., Melamed J., et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159 (1998) 471-475
11. Presti J.C., Chang J.J., Bhargava V., et al. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 163 (2000) 163-166
12. Rabets J.C., Jones S., Patel A., et al. Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. J Urol 172 (2004) 94-97
13. Djavan B., Ravery V., and Ziotta A.R. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?. J Urol 166 (2001) 1269-1283
14. Remzi M., Fong Y.K., Dobrovits M., et al. The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol 174 (2005) 1256-1261
15. Epstein J.I., Sanderson H., Carter H.B., et al. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. Urology 66 (2005) 356-360
16. Rocco B., Cobelli O., Leon M.E., et al. Sensitivity and detection rate of a 12-core trans-perineal prostate biopsy: preliminary report. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 827-833
17. Djavan B., Waldert M., Zlotta A., et al. Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study. J Urol 166 (2001) 856-860
18. Bueno R., Loughlin K.R., Powell M.H., et al. A diagnostic test for prostate cancer from gene expression profiling data. J Urol 171 (2004) 903-906
19. Cazares L.H., Adam B., Ward M.D., et al. Normal, benign, preneoplastic, and malignant prostate cells have distinct protein expression profiles resolved by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Clin Cancer Res 8 (2002) 2541-2552
20. Liu A., Zhang H., Sorensen C.M., et al. Analysis of prostate cancer by proteomics using tissue specimens. J Urol 173 (2005) 73-78