Knockdown and mortality comparisons among spinosad-, imidacloprid-, and methomyl-containing baits against susceptible Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) under laboratory conditions

Journal of Economic Entomology

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 155-163

  White, W Hunter ^a   McCoy, Christine M ^a   Meyer, Jeffery A ^a   Winkle, Joseph R ^a   Plummer, Philip R ^a   Kemper, Connie J ^a   Starkey, Robert ^a   Snyder, Daniel E ^a  

^a ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

House fly; Imidacloprid; Methomyl; Musca domestica; Spinosad

Indexed keywords

IMIDACLOPRID; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; INSECTICIDE; MACROLIDE; METHOMYL; NITRO DERIVATIVE; SPINOSAD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; HOUSE FLY; INSECT CONTROL; INSTRUMENTATION; TIME;

ANIMALS; DRUG COMBINATIONS; HOUSEFLIES; IMIDAZOLES; INSECT CONTROL; INSECTICIDES; MACROLIDES; METHOMYL; NITRO COMPOUNDS; TIME FACTORS;

DIPTERA; MUSCA DOMESTICA; MUSCIDAE;

EID: 33947237759     PISSN: 00220493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[155:KAMCAS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method for computing the effectiveness of insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265-267.
2. Clark, J. M., J. G. Scott, F. Campos, and J. R. Bloomquist. 1995. Resistance to avermectins: extent, mechanisms, and management implications. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 1-30.
3. Darbro, J. M., and B. A. Mullens. 2004. Assessing insecticide resistance and aversion to methomyl-treated toxic baits in Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) populations in southern California. Pest Manag. Sci. 60: 901-908.
4. Graczyk, T. K., M. R. Cranfield, R. Fayer, and H. Bixler. 1999. House flies (Musca domestica) as transport hosts of Cryptosporidium parvum. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60: 500-504.
5. Hanley, M. E., D. W. Dunn, S. R. Abolins, and D. Goulson. 2004. Evaluation of (Z)-9-tricosene baited targets for control of the housefly (Musca domestica) in outdoor situations. J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 478-482.
6. Iwasa, M., S. Makino, H. Asakura, H. Kobori, and Y. Morimoto. 1999. Detection of Escherichia coli O157-.H7 from Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) at a cattle farm in Japan. J. Med. Entomol. 36: 108-112.
7. Kaufman, P. E., J. G. Scott, and D. A. Rutz. 2001. Monitoring insecticide resistance in house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from New York dairies. Pest Manag. Sci. 57: 514-521.
8. Kristensen, M., and J. B. Jespersen. 2004. Susceptibility of spinosad in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) field populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1042-1048.
9. Kristensen, M., J. B. Jespersen, and M. Knorr. 2004. Cross-resistance potential of fipronil in Musca domestica. Pest Manag. Sci. 60: 894-900.
10. Liu, N., and X. Yue. 2000. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 1269-1275.
11. Marçon, P. C., G. D. Thomas, B. D. Seigfried, J. B. Campbell, and S. R. Skoda. 2003. Resistance status of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from southeastern Nebraska beef cattle feedlots to selected insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 1016-1020.
12. Mertz, F. P., and R. C. Yao. 1990 Saccharopolyspora spinosa sp. nov. isolated from soil collected in a sugar mill rum still. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40: 34-39.
13. Motulsky, H. J. 1999. Analyzing data with GraphPad Prism. GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA.
14. Nayduch, D., G. P. Noblet, and F. J. Stutzenberger. 2002. Vector potential of houseflies for the bacterium Aeromonas caviae. Med. Vet. Entomol. 16: 193-198.
15. Olsen, A. R., and T. S. Hammack. 2000. Isolation of Salmonella spp. from the house fly, Musca domestica L., and the dump fly, Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Muscidae), at caged-layer houses. J. Food Prot. 63: 958-960.
16. Pinto, M. C., and A. P. do Prado. 2001. Resistance of Musca domestica L. populations to cyromazine (insect growth regulator) in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 96: 729-732.
17. Schneider-Orelli, O. 1947. Entomoligisches. Praktikum. H.R. Sauerlander. Aarau, Switzerland.
18. Scott, J. G. 1998. Toxicity of spinosad to susceptible and resistant strains of house flies, Musca domestica. Pestic. Sci. 54: 131-133.
19. Scott, J. G., and Z. M. Wen. 1997. Toxicity of fipronil to susceptible and resistant strains of German cockroaches (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) and house flies (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 1152-1156.
20. Shono, T., and J. G. Scott. 2003. Spinosad resistance in the housefly, Musca domestica, is due to a recessive factor on autosome 1. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 75: 1-7.
21. Szalanski, A. L., C. B. Owens, T. McKay, C. D. Steelman. 2004. Detection of Campylobacter and Escherichia coli O157:H7 from filth flies by polymerase chain reaction. Med. Vet. Entomol. 18: 241-246.
22. Wang, H., and X. Sun. 2005. Densensitized nicotinic receptors in brain. Brain Res. Rev. 48: 420-437.
23. Wen, Z. M., and J. G. Scott. 1999. Genetic and biochemical mechanisms limiting fipronil toxicity in the LPR strain of house fly, Musca domestica. Pestic. Sci. 55: 988-992.
24. Zurek, L., S. S. Denning, C. Schal, and D. W. Watson. 2001. Vector competence of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. J. Med. Entomol. 38: 333-335.