Clinical efficacy of conservative laser therapy for early-stage cervical cancer

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 455-459

  Yamaguchi, H ^a   Ueda, M ^b   Kanemura, M ^a   Izuma, S ^b   Nishiyama, K ^a   Tanaka, Y ^a   Noda, S ^b  

^a OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b Osaka Cancer Prevention and Detection Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Conservative management; Laser therapy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPLASIA; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VAPORIZATION;

CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CONIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASER SURGERY; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33947237315     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00868.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cox JT. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 1999;353:857-9.
2. Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG et al. Combined colposcopy, loop conization, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2000;78:47-51.
3. Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;106:214-8.
4. Ueki M, Okamoto Y, Misaki O et al. Conservative therapy for micro-invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1994;53:109-13.
5. Ueki M, Ueda M, Kumagai K, Okamoto Y, Noda S, Matsuoka M. Cervical cytology and conservative management of cervical neoplasias during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1995;14:63-9.
6. Okamoto Y, Ueki K, Ueki M. Pathological indications for conservative therapy in treating cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:818-23.
7. FIGO Cancer Committee. Staging announcement. Gynecol Oncol 1979;8:353-85.
8. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Arseneau J. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: advantages and potential pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:332-7.
9. Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, Whittaker L, Rhodes-Morris H, Silva E. A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:737-44.
10. Ferenczy A. Comparison of cryo- and carbon dioxide laser therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:793-8.
11. Gunasekera PC, Phipps JH, Lewis BV. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: a superior mode of treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:995-8.
12. Vergote IB, Makar AP, Kjorstad KE. Laser excision of the transformation zone as treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with satisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 1992;44:235-9.
13. Mahadevan N, Horwell DH. The value of cytology and colposcopy in the follow up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after treatment by laser excision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:563-6.
14. 2 laser in treatment of carcinoma in situ (CIN III) of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1985;22:195-200.
15. Kwikkel HJ, Helmerhorst TJ, Bezemer PD, Quaak MJ, Stolk JG. Laser or cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized study to compare efficacy and side effects. Gynecol Oncol 1985;22:23-31.
16. 2 laser versus cryotherapy, a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:531-6.
17. Berget A, Andreasson B, Bock JE. Laser and cryo surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. A randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70:231-5.
18. Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edwards RP et al. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1994;52:175-9.
19. Creasman WT, Zaino RJ, Major FJ, DiSaia PJ, Hatch KD, Homesley HD. Early invasive carcinoma of the cervix (3 to 5 mm invasion): risk factors and prognosis. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:62-5.
20. Elliott P, Coppleson M, Russell P et al. Early invasive (FIGO stage IA) carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 476 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000;10:42-52.
21. Ostor AG, Rome RM. Micro-invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 200 cases with long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1994;4:257-64.
22. Buckley SL, Tritz DM, Van Le L et al. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;63:4-9.
23. Roman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI et al. Influence of quantity of lymph-vascular space invasion on the risk of nodal metastases in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1998;68:220-5.
24. Koliopoulos G, Sotiriadis A, Kyrgiou M, Martin-Hirsch P, Makrydimas G, Paraskevaidis E. Conservative surgical methods for FIGO stage IA2 squamous cervical carcinoma and their role in preserving women's fertility. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:469-73.
25. Zaino RJ, Ward S, Delgado G et al. Histopathologic predictors of the behavior of surgically treated stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 1992;69:1750-8.