Callery pear cultivars tested as street trees: Final report on a 12-year study

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 153-156

  Gerhold, Henry D ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Callery pear cultivars; Performance testing; Pyrus calleryana; Street tree evaluation

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; FOLIAGE; MEASUREMENT METHOD; TREE PLANTING;

PYRUS; PYRUS CALLERYANA;

EID: 33947235716     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Fare, D.C., C.H. Gilliam, and H.G. Ponder. 1991. Fireblight susceptibility, growth and other characteristics in ornamental pears in Alabama. Journal of Arboriculture 17: 257-260.
2. Gerhold, H.D. 2000. Callery pear cultivars tested as street trees: Second report. Journal of Arboriculture 26:55-59.
3. Gerhold, H.D., and H.L. McElroy. 1994. Callery pear cultivars tested as street trees: Initial results. Journal of Arboriculture 20:259-261.
4. Haserodt, H., and T.D. Sydnor. 1983. Growth habits of five cultivars of Pyrus calleryana. Journal of Arboriculture 9: 160-163.
5. Kuser, J.E., G. Robinson, and N. Polarin. 2001. Four-year evaluation of five cultivars of Pyrus calleryana. Journal of Arboriculture 27:88-91.
6. Society of Municipal Arborists. 2004. 2005 urban tree of the year, 'Chanticleer' pear. City Trees 40:34-38.