Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 49-56

  Sorrentino, Roberto ^a   Salameh, Ziad ^b   Zarone, Fernando ^c   Tay, Franklin R ^d   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite; Fracture resistance; Post

Indexed keywords

AELITEFLO; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CALIBRA; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ESTHET X; ESTHET-X; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; TETRIC CERAM; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 33947233666     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abramovitz L, Lev R, Fuss Z, Metzger Z. The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation: a fluid transport study. J Endod 2001;27:292-295.
2. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:155-162.
3. Akkayan B, Caniklioglu B. Resistance to fracture of crowned teeth restored with different post systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1998;6:13-18.
4. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-437.
5. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
6. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-567.
7. Assif D, Nissan J, Gafni Y, Gordon M. Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:462-465.
8. Baratieri LN, De Andrada MA, Arcari GM, Ritter AV. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:180-184.
9. Belli S, Erdemir A, Ozcopur M, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J 2005;38:73-80.
10. Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1397-1398.
11. Croll TP. The "sandwich" technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:210-212.
12. Drummond JL, Toepke TR, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220-224.
13. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjor IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000;13:255-260.
14. Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber posts: characteristics and clinical applications. Milan, Italy: Masson 2002;1-4.
15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
16. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17:422-429.
17. . Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:543-549.
18. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
19. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-116.
20. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:341-347.
21. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part III. Tooth preparation considerations. J Prosthod 1995;4:122-128.
22. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:353-361.
23. Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the surface of fiber posts after cutting. J Endod 2002;28:610-612.
24. Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay FR, Grandini R, Ferrari M. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:399-404.
25. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater 2005;21:75-82.
26. Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:342-349.
27. Korioth TW, Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:90-104.
28. Kraus BS, Jordan RE, Abrams L. A study of the masticatory system - Dental anatomy and occlusion. Baltimore, USA: Williams & Wilkins 1969, 31-34.
29. Krejci I, Due O, Dietschi D, de Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 2003;28:127-135.
30. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:247-251.
31. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:297-301.
32. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-158.
33. Monticelli F, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Micromorphology of the fiber post-resin core unit: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Dent Mater 2004;20:176-183.
34. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissue. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence 1998;54-56.
35. Ngoh EC, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough F. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod 2001;27:411-414.
36. Salis SG, Hood JA, Stokes AN, Kirk EE. Patterns of indirect fracture in intact and restored human premolar teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987;3:10-14.
37. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
38. Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:57-64.
39. Sorrentino R, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Zarone F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of post retained composite restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth related to the amount of coronal residual structure. Am J Dent 2006; in press.
40. St.Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift FJ Jr, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:551-557.
41. Stockton L, Lavelle CL, Suzuki M. Are posts mandatory for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:59-63.
42. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:120-124.
43. Tjan A, Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessence Int 1992;22:839-844.
44. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:218-221.
45. Trope M, Langer I, Maltz D, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:35-38.
46. Uyehara MY, Davis RD, Overton JD. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars. Oper Dent 1999;24:364-370.
47. Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In: Cohen S, Burns RC (eds). Pathways of the Pulp, ed 8. St Louis: Mosby, 2002: 765-795.
48. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:94-98.