Bladder Neck Sling and Appendicovesicostomy Without Augmentation for Neurogenic Incontinence in Children

Journal of Urology

Volumn 177, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1510-1515

  Snodgrass, Warren T ^a   Elmore, James ^c   Adams, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

neurogenic; urinary bladder; urinary incontinence; urologic surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; OXYBUTYNIN;

ADOLESCENT; APPENDICOVESICOSTOMY; ARTICLE; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER COMPLIANCE; BLADDER NECK SLING; BLADDER SURGERY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; ENTEROCYSTOPLASTY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERREFLEXIA; MALE; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; URODYNAMICS;

ADOLESCENT; APPENDIX; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CYSTOSTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY BLADDER, NEUROGENIC; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 33947206068     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.080     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Perez L.M., Smith E.A., Broecker B.H., Massad C.A., Parrott T.S., and Woodard J.R. Outcome of sling cystourethropexy in the pediatric population: a critical review. J Urol 156 (1996) 642
2. Lottmann H., Traxer O., Aigrain Y., and Melin Y. Posterior approach to the bladder for implantation of the 800 AMS artificial sphincter in children and adolescents: techniques and results in eight patients. Ann Urol (Paris) 33 (1999) 357
3. Light J.K., and Pietro T. Alteration in detrusor behavior and the effect on renal function following insertion of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 136 (1986) 632
4. Roth D.R., Vyas P.R., Kroovand R.L., and Perlmutter A.D. Urinary tract deterioration associated with the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 135 (1986) 528
5. Bauer S.B., Reda E.F., Colodny A.H., and Retik A.B. Detrusor instability: a delayed complication in association with the artificial sphincter. J Urol 135 (1986) 1212
6. Kronner K.M., Rink R.C., Simmons G., Kropp B.P., Casale A.J., and Cain M.P. Artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of urinary incontinence: preoperative urodynamics do not predict the need for future bladder augmentation. J Urol 160 (1998) 1093
7. deBadiola F.I., Castro-Diaz D., Hart-Austin C., and Gonzalez R. Influence of preoperative bladder capacity and compliance on the outcome of artificial sphincter implantation in patients with neurogenic sphincter incompetence. J Urol 148 (1992) 1493
8. McGuire E.J., Wang C.C., Usitalo H., and Savastano J. Modified pubovaginal sling in girls with myelodysplasia. J Urol 135 (1986) 94
9. Kryger J.V., Gonzalez R., and Barthold J.S. Surgical management of urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic sphincteric incompetence. J Urol 163 (2000) 256
10. Palmer L.S., Richards I., and Kaplan W.E. Age related bladder capacity and bladder capacity growth in children with myelomeningocele. J Urol 158 (1997) 1261
11. Webb R.J., Styles R.A., Griffiths C.J., Ramsden P.D., and Neal D.E. Ambulatory monitoring of bladder pressures in patients with low compliance as a result of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Br J Urol 64 (1989) 150
12. Decter R.M., and Harpster L. Pitfalls in determination of leak point pressure. J Urol 148 (1992) 588
13. Lowe D.H., Scherz H.C., and Parsons C.L. Urethral pressure profilometry in Scott artificial urinary sphincter. Urology 31 (1988) 82
14. Churchill B.M., Gilmour R.F., Khoury A.E., and McLorie G.A. Biological response of bladders rendered continent by insertion of artificial sphincter. J Urol 138 (1987) 1116