Inequality of origin and earnings prospect in France, 1977-1993;Inégalité de milieu d'origine et destin salarial en France, 1977-1993

Revue d'Economie Politique

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 91-117

  Lefranc, Arnaud ^a   Pistolesi, Nicolas ^b   Trannoy, Alain ^c  

^a UMR 8184   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE CERGY PONTOISE   (France)

^c Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

Circumstances; Inequality of opportunity; Mean logarithmic deviation; Stochastic dominance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947195315     PISSN: 03732630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/redp.171.0091     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ARNESON R. [1989], Equality and equal opportunity for welfare, Philosophical Studies 56: pp. 77-93.
2. COHEN G. [1989], On the currency of egalitarian justice, Ethics 99 : pp. 906-944.
3. CORAK M. et HEISZ A. [1999], The intergenerational earnings and income mobility of Canadian men : evidence from longitudinal income tax data, Journal of Human Resources 84(3): pp. 504-533.
4. DARDANONI V., FIELDS G. S., ROEMER J. and SANCHEZ-PUERTA M. L. [2005], How demanding should equality of opportunity be, and how much hâve we achieved?, in S. Morgan, D. Grusky and G. Fields (eds), Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Reasearch in Sociology and Economics, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
5. DAVIDSON R. et DUCLOS J.-Y. [2000], Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality, Econometrica 68(6): pp. 1435-1464.
6. DWORKIN R. [1981], What is equality? Part 1 : Equality of welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: pp. 185-246.
7. FLEURBAEY M. et MANIQUET F. [2006], Compensation and responsibility, in K. Arrow, A. Sen and K. Suzumura (eds), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 2, Elsevier Science, New York.
8. FOSTER J. et SHNEYEROV A. [2000], Path independent inequality measures, Journal of Economic Theory 91 : pp. 199-222.
9. GOUX D. et MAURIN E. [1994], Education, expérience et salaire : tendances récentes et évolution de long terme, Economie et Prévision 116 : pp. 155-178.
10. LEFRANC A. et TRANNOY A. [2005], Intergenerational earnings mobility in France : Is France more mobile than the US?, Annales d'économie et de statistique, 78 : pp. 57-77.
11. LEFRANC A., PISTOLESI N. et TRANNOY A. [2004], Le revenu selon l'origine sociale, Economie et statistique 371 : pp. 49-82.
12. LEFRANC A., PISTOLESI N. et TRANNOY, A. [2006], Equality of opportunity: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France, Document de travail IDEP, numéro 62.
13. OK E. A. et FOSTER J. E. [1999], Lorenz dominance and the variance of logarithms, Econometrica 67 : pp. 901-908.
14. O'NEIL D., SWEETMAN, O. et VAN DE GAER D. [2000], Equality of opportunity and kernel density estimation : an application to intergenerational mobility, in T. Fomby and C. R. Hill (eds), Advances in Econometrics : Applying Kernel and Nonparametric Estimation to Economic Topics, Vol. 14, Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp. 259-274.
15. OSTERBACKA E. [2001], Family background and économic status in Finland, Scandinavian Journal of Economies 103(3): pp. 467-484.
16. ROEMER J. [1998], Equality of Opportunity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
17. ROEMER J. [2004], Going beyond intergenerational income transition matrices, in M. Corak (éd.), Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, Cambridge University Press.
18. VAN DE GAER D. [1993], Equality of Opportunity and Investment in Human Capital, PhD thesis, K.U. Leuven.
19. VAN DE GAER D., SCHOKKAERT E. et MARTINEZ P. [2001], Three meanings of intergenerational mobility, Economica 68 : pp. 519-537.