Empirical research of the principal component analysis and ordered weighted averaging integrated evaluation model on software projects

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 289-303

  Yeh, Duen Yian ^a   Cheng, Ching Hsue ^b   Yio, Hwei Wun ^b  

^a TRANSWORLD INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

FEASIBILITY; ORDERED WEIGHTED AVERAGING (OWA); SOFTWARE INDUSTRY; SOFTWARE PROJECTS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33947192958     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01969720601187347     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boehm, B. W. 1988. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21:61-72.
2. Cheng, C. H. 2005. Dynamic fuzzy OWA model for evaluating the risks of software project. Soft Computing (in press).
3. Fuller, R. and P. Majlender. 2001. An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 124:53-57.
4. Hotelling, H. 1933. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24:498-520.
5. Humphrey, W. S. 1989. Managing the Software Process. MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Jiang, J. J., G. Klein, H.-G. Hwang, J. Hunag, and S.-Y. Hung. 2004. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information and Management, 41: 279-288.
7. Krishnan, M. S., C. H. Kriebel, S. Kekre, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 2000. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Science, 46(6):745-759.
8. Lee, M., H. Pham, and X. Zhang. 1999. A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process. European Journal of Operational Research, 118:375-389.
9. Li, E. Y., H.-G. Chen, and T.-S. Lee. 2002. Software process management of top companies in Taiwan: a comparative study. Total Quality Management, 13(5):701-713.
10. O'Hagan, M. 1988. Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic. Proceedings 22nd Annual IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. Pacific Grove, CA, 81-689.
11. Pearson, K. 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in spaces. Philosophical Magazine, 2(6):559-572.
12. Rainer, A. and T. Hall. 2003. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of factors affecting software process. The Journal of Systems and Software, 66:7-21.
13. Smolíková, R. and M. P. Wachowiak. 2002. Aggregation operators for selection problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 131(1):23-34.
14. Wilson, D. N., T. Hall, and N. Baddoo. 2001. A framework for evaluation and predicton of software process improvement success. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59:135-142.
15. Yager, R. R. 1988. Ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions Systems Man and Cybernetics, 18:183-190.
16. Yager, R. R. 1993. Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 59: 125-148.