Interior prospect and refuge

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 643-653

  Stamps III, Arthur E ^a  

^a Institute of Environmental Quality   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FURNITURE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SAFETY;

AFFECT; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERIOR DESIGN AND FURNISHINGS; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SAFETY;

EID: 33947186790     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PMS.103.3.643-653     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. APPLETON, J. (1975/1996) The experience of landscape. New York: Wiley.
2. APPLETON, J. (1984) Prospects and refuges revisited. Landscape Journal, 3, 91-103.
3. APPLETON, J. (1990) The symbolism of habitat. Seattle, WA: Univer. of Washington Press.
4. BARKOW, J. H., COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (Eds.) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
5. ENGEL, H. (1964) The Japanese house: a tradition for contemporary architecture. Rutland, VT: Tuttle.
6. FEIMER, N. R. (1984) Environmental perception: the effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 61-80.
7. HEERWAGEN, J. H., & ORIANS, G. H. (1993) Humans, habitats and aesthetics. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. Pp. 138-172.
8. HILDEBRAND, G. (1999) Origins of architectural pleasure. Berkeley, CA: Univer. of California Press.
9. KELLERT, S. R., & WILSON, E. O. (Eds.) (1993) The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. ORIANS, G. H. (2001) An evolutionary perspective on aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 25-29.
11. PALMER, J. F., & HOFFMAN, R. E. (2001) Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161.
12. SCHULTZ, P. W., & ZELEZNY, L. (1999) Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
13. STAMPS, A. E. III. (1992) Bootstrap investigation of respondent sample size for environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 220-222.
14. STAMPS, A. E. III. (1993) Simulation effects on environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 115-132.
15. STAMPS, A. E. III. (1997) A paradigm for distinguishing significant from non-significant visual impacts: theory, implementation, case histories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17, 249-293.
16. STAMPS, A. E. III. (1999) Demographic effects in environmental preferences: a meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14, 155-175.
17. STAMPS, A. E. III. (2000) Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
18. STAMPS, A. E. III. (2002) Meta-analysis. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), The handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley. Pp. 222-232.
19. STAMPS, A. E. III. (in submission) Some findings on prospect and refuge theory. Journal of Environment Psychology.
20. STAMPS, A. E. III, & NASAR, J. L. (1997) Design review and public preferences: effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 11-32.
21. ULRICH, R. S. (1993) Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. Pp. 73-137.