The effect of the key process parameters in the innovative hydroforming on the formed parts

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 187-188, Issue , 2007, Pages 304-308

  Lang, Lihui ^a   Li, Tao ^a   Zhou, Xianbin ^a   Danckert, Joachim ^b   Nielsen, Karl Brian ^b  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Aluminum alloy; Numerical simulation; Quality; Sheet hydroforming

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROFORMYLATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

MASS VOLUME PRODUCTION; PROCESS PARAMETERS; SHEET HYDROFORMING;

PROCESS PLANNING;

EID: 33947181987     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.196     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sieger K. Recent developments in hydroforming technology. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 98 (2000) 251-258
2. Thiruvarudchelvan S., and Lewis W. A note on hydroforming with constant fluid pressure. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88 (1999) 51-56
3. L.H. Lang, Sheet-metal hydrodynamic deep drawing and the numerical simulation of the forming process, Ph.D Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, 1998 (in Chinese).
4. Tirosh J., and Konvalina P. On the hydrodynamic deep drawing process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 27 (1985) 595-610
5. Yossifon S., and Tirosh J. The maximum drawing ratio in hydroforming process. J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME 112 February (1990) 47-62
6. Lang L., Danckert J., and Nielsen K.B. Investigation into the forming of a complex cup locally constrained by a round die based on an innovative hydromechanical deep drawing method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 167 2-3 (2005) 191-200
7. Kim J., and Kang B.S. Implementation of backward tracing scheme of the FEM for design of initial tubular blank in hydroforming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125-126 (2002) 839-848
8. Hirt G., and Junk S. Calibration pressure required for hydroforming: comparison of analytical and numerical calculation methods. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sheet Metal. Leuven, Belgium (2001) 563-570
9. J.O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA: Theoretical Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 1998.
10. Yuan S.J., Lang L., Wang X., and Wang Z.R. Experiment and numerical simulation of aluminum tube hydroforming. 2nd International Conference on Hydroforming. Stuttgart, Germany, November 6-7 (2001) 339-349
11. Barlat F., and Lian J. Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals, part I: a yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int. J. Plasticity 5 (1989) 51-66
12. Malo K.A., Hopperstad O.S., and Lademo O.G. Calibration of anisotropic yield criteria using uniaxial tension tests and bending tests. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 80-81 (1998) 538-544
13. Lang L., Danckert J., and Nielsen K.B. Investigation into the effect of pre-bulging in the hydromechanical deep drawing with uniform pressure onto the blank. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 44 (2004) 649-657
14. Nakamura K., and Nakagawa T. Sheet metal forming with hydraulic counter pressure in Japan. Annal. CIRP 36 (1987) 191-194
15. Nakagawa T., Nakamura K., and Amino H. Various applications of hydraulic counter pressure deep drawing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 71 (1997) 160-167