A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement (NTM);En kvalitativ undersøgelse af gravides valg af nakkefoldskanning

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 169, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 914-918

  Lou, Stina ^a,b   Dahl, Katja ^a   Risør, Mette Bech ^a   Hvidman, Lone E ^a   Thomsen, Sten Grove ^a   Jørgensen, Finn Stener ^a   Olesen, Frede ^a   Kjærgaard, Hanne ^a   Kesmodel, Ulrik ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; MOTIVATION; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHORT SURVEY;

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS; MOTIVATION; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33947171869     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (18)

1. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Retningslinier for fosterdiagnostik: prænatal information, risikovurdering, rådgivning og diagnostik. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2004.
2. Lov om patienters retsstilling. 01.07.1998.
3. Grewal GK, Moss HJ, Aitken DA et al. Factors affecting women's knowledge on antenatal serum screening. Scott Med J 1997;42:111-3.
4. Smith DK, Shaw RW, Marteau TM. Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down Syndrome: the gap between policy and practice. BMJ 1994;309:776-80.
5. Gekas J, Gondry J, Severine M et al. Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information? Prenatal Diag 1999;19:1-7.
6. Jaques AM, Bell RJ, Watson L et al. People who influence women's decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:233-8.
7. Lou S. Et godt tilbud: en kvalitativ interviewundersøgelse af gravides viden om og holdninger til fosterdiagnostik. Århus: Institut for Folkesundhed, Afdeling for Epidemiologi, Aarhus Universitet, 2005.
8. Kvale S. Interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
9. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Routledge, 1997.
10. Werner O, Schoepfle GM. Systematic fieldwork. Vol. 1. Newbury Park: Sage, 1987.
11. Creswell JW. Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
12. Thagaard K. Systematikk og innlevelse. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2003.
13. Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1979.
14. Bertelsen AMH, Gohr C. Den gode fødsel: en antropologisk analyse af fødselsfortællinger anno 2004. DSOG, 2004.
15. Oliver S, Rajan L, Turner H et al. Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives and ultrasonographers. BMJ 1996;313:1251-3.
16. Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ et al. A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing. BMJ 1995;311:1127-30.
17. Marteau TM, Kidd J, Michie S et al. Anxiety, knowledge and satisfaction in women receiving false positive results on routine prenatal screening: a randomised controlled trial. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1993;14:185-96.
18. Eneroth B. Hur mäter man 'vackert'? Göteborg: Natur och kultur, 1984.