Pancreatic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP)

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 124-130

  Dumonceau, Jean Marc ^a   Vonlaufen, A ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS TUMOR; LONG TERM CARE; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS JUICE; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATITIS; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENT; SURGICAL DRAINAGE;

ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHRONIC DISEASE; DRAINAGE; HUMANS; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATITIS; RISK FACTORS; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; STENTS;

EID: 33947171517     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-945096     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Farnbacher MJ, Muhldorfer S, Wehler M et al. Interventional endoscopic therapy in chronic pancreatitis including temporary stenting: a definitive treatment? Scand J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 111-117
2. Costamagna G, Bulajic M, Tringali A et al. Multiple stenting of refractory pancreatic duct strictures in severe chronic pancreatitis: long-term results. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 254-259
3. Eleftheriadis F, Dinu F, Delhaye M et al. Long-term outcome after pancreatic stenting in severe chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 223-230
4. Morgan DE, Smith JK, Hawkins K et al. Endoscopic stent therapy in advanced chronic pancreatitis: relationships between ductal changes, clinical response, and stent patency. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 821-826
5. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
6. Hookey LC, RioTinto R, Delhaye M et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis after pancreatic sphincterotomy: a review of 572 cases. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 670-676
7. Brackbill S, Young S, Schoenfeld P et al. A survey of physician practices on prophylactic pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 45-52
8. Guda N, Partington S, Freeman M. Does the type of current (pure vs blended) matter for post ERCP complications: a meta analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: AB191
9. Fisher L, Fisher A, Thomson A. Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP in older patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 948-955
10. Wasan SM, Ross WA, Staerkel GA et al. Use of expandable metallic biliary stents in resectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2056-2061
11. Chen VK, Arguedas MR, Baron TH. Expandable metal biliary stents before pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a Monte Carlo decision analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 1229-1237
12. Maire F, Hammel P, Ponsot P et al. Long-term outcome of biliary and duodenal stents in palliative treatment of patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 735-742
13. Lawrence C, Howell DA, Conklin DE et al. Delayed pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer patients with prior ERCP-placed, nonforeshortening, self-expanding metal stents: a positive outcome. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 804-807
14. Levy P, Jouannaud V, O'Toole D et al. Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: actuarial risk of malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 460-468
15. Irie H, Yoshimitsu K, Aibe H et al. Natural history of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of branch duct type: follow-up study by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 117-122
16. Eguchi H, Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H et al. Patients with pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are at high risk of colorectal cancer development. Surgery 2006; 139: 749-754
17. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006; 6: 17-32
18. Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 635-643
19. Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Conaway MR et al. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 355-359
20. Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S et al. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 92-100
21. Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 977-983
22. Yusuf TE, Baron TH. Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and an international survey of ASGE members. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 223-227
23. Harewood GC, Wright CA, Baron TH. Impact on patient outcomes of eperience in the performance of endoscopic pancreatic fluid collection drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 230-235