What do we learn from emissions reporting? Analytical considerations and comparison of pollutant release and transfer registers in the United States, Canada, England, and Australia

Risk Analysis

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 203-223

  Kerret, Dorit ^a   Gray, George M ^a  

^a HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative research; Emissions and risk; Pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs); Reported emissions; Toxic release inventory (TRI)

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; RISK MANAGEMENT;

COMPARATIVE RESEARCH; REPORTED EMISSIONS; TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI);

POLLUTION CONTROL;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATABASE; EMISSION CONTROL; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; POLLUTION MONITORING; POLLUTION POLICY;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; DATA BASE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FIELD EMISSION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; POLLUTANT; REGISTER; RISK REDUCTION; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; ENGLAND; ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; NEOPLASMS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33947164335     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00870.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart Regulation - Designing Environmental Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Baeke, S. (1999). The Nature of Voluntary Approaches: Empirical Evidence and Patterns Literature Survey. CAVA Working Paper 99/08/3 available at http://www.cerna.ensmp.fr/Documents/99-08-3.pdf.
3. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (1999). Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy - An Assessment. Paris: OECD.
4. Rechtschaffen, C. (1998). Deterrence v. cooperation and the evolving theory of environmental enforcement. South Carolina Law Review, 71, 1181.
5. Wasserman, C., & Jerardo, J. (1992). Principles of Environmental Enforcement, J. Connery (Ed.). Washington: EPA.
6. Stewart, R. B. (2001). A New Generation of Environmental Regulation? Capital University Law Review, 29, 21.
7. Coglianese, C., & Nash, J. (2001). Regulating from the Inside - Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals. Washington: Resources for the Future.
8. Stenzel, P. L. (2000). Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulation? American Business Law Journal, 37(2), 237.
9. Kakkainen,B. (2001). Information as regulation: TRI and performance benchmarking, precursor to a new paradigm? Geo. L. J., 89, 257.x. Georgetown Law Journal.
10. Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2003). The Political Economy of Transparency - What Makes Disclosure Policies Sustainable? Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP03-039 John F. Kennedy School for Government. Harvard University. Boston, MA. Available at: http://ksg-notes1.harvard.edu /research/wpaper.nsf/rwp /RWP03-039/$File/rwp03_039_fung.pdf.
11. Case, D. W. (2005). Corporate environmental reporting as informational regulation: A law and economics perspective. University of Colorado Law Review, 76, 379.
12. Hanks, J. (2002). A role for negotiated environmental agreements in developing countries. In P. Ten-Brink (Ed.), Voluntary Environmental Agreements (pp. 159-175). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
13. Kerret, D., & Tal, A. (2005). Green wash or green gain? Predicting the success and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental voluntary agreements. Penn State Environmental Law Journal, 14(1), 379-442.
14. Clercq, M. D. (2002). Negotiating Environmental Agreements in Europe. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
15. Ramesohl, S., & Kristof, K. (2002). Voluntary agreements - An effective tool for enhacing organisational learning and improving climate policy-making? In P. T. Brink (Ed.), Voluntary Environmental Agreements (pp. 426-436). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
16. Metzenbaum, S. H. (2001). Information, environmental performance, and environmental management systems. In C. Coglianese & J. Nash (Eds.), Regulating from the Inside - Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? (pp. 146-180). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
17. Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Azzone, G., Carlens, J., Drunen, M., Jasch, C., Noci, G., Olsthoorn, X., Tyteca, D., Van Der Woerd, F., Wagner, M., Wehrmeyer, W., & Wolf, O. (2001). Measuring the Environmental Performance of Industry (MEPI) - Final Report. Available at http://susproc.jrc.es/docs/ MEPI%20FinalReport.pdf. SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Department of Economics and Production, Politecnico di Milano, Institut für Oekologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IOeW), Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Centre Enterprise-Environnement (CEE), Université Catholique de Louvain, Centre for Environmental Strategy (CES), University of Surrey, IPTS Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
18. Tietenberg, T., & Wheeler, D. (1998). Empowering the community: Information strategies for pollution control. In Frontiers of Environmental Economics Conference, Airlie House Virginia. Available at http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC6624.htm.
19. Afsah, S., & Vincent, J. (1997). Putting pressure on polluters: Indonesia's proper program. In Harvard Institute for International Development - 1997 Environmental Economics Policy Seminar. Available at www.worldbank.org/nipr/work_paper/vincent/vincent.pdf.
20. Wang, H., Bi, J., Wheeler, D., Wang, J., Cao, D., Lu, G., & Wang, Y. (2002). Environmental Performance Rating and Disclosure: China's Green Watch Program. Available at www.worldbank.org/nipr/work_paper/hua/ EnvironmentalPerformanceRatingandDisclosure.htm.
21. Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., & Mamingi, N. (1998). Capital Market Responses to Environmental Performance in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Development Research Group. Available at http://www.worldbank. org/html/dec/Publications/Workpapers/WPS 1900series/wps1909/wps1909.pdf.
22. Wheeler, D. (1997). Information in Pollution Management: The New Model. World Bank Report 16513-BR.
23. Environment-Link. (2005). Final Report - Review of the National Pollutant Inventory for the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Available at http://www.npi.gov.au/about/review/pubs/npi-review290405.pdf.
24. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Why Pollutanat Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) Differ: A Review of National Programs. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers No. 4. Report no. env/jm/mono(2001)13. Available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2001doc.nsf/ LinkTo/env-jm-mono(2001)16.
25. Comission for Environmental Cooperation of North America (CEC). (2005). Taking Stock - 2002 North American Pollutant Releases and Transfers. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Available at http://www.cec.org/files/PDF/POLLUTANTS/ TS2002_en.pdf.
26. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Uses of Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data and Tools for Their Presentation - A Reference Manual. OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Pollutant Release and Transfer Register No. 7. Environment Directorate - OECD. ENV/JM/MONO(2005)3. Available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2005doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005 d004c/546a5d6d751bc761c1256f95005512b8/$FILE/JT00177567.PDF
27. Afsah, S., Laplante, B., & Wheeler, D. (1997). Regulation in the information age - Indonesian public information program for environmental management.World Bank Working Papers Series.
28. Pargal, S., & Wheeler, D. (1995). Informal Regulation of Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper # 1416. World Bank. Available at http://www.p2pays.org/ref/22/21749.pdf.
29. Zeng, S. X., & Wang, H. C. (2000). Determinants of Environmental Management System. Shanghai, China: Aetna School of Management Shanghai Jiotong University.
30. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2000). PRTR Implementation: Member Country Progress. Environment Directorate OECD. Report no. Env/epoc(2000)8/FINAL available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/ olis/2000doc.nsf/4f7adc214b91ac685c12569fa005d0ee7/ c125692700623b74c125691a004f1790/$FILE/10080892.PDF.
31. Environment Protection Agency (EPA). (2003). How Are the Toxics Release Inventory Data Used? Government, Business, Academic and Citizen Uses.
32. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Presentation and Dissemination of PRTR Data: Practices and Experiences. Series on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers No. 3.
33. US-EPA. (2003). How Are the Toxics Release Inventory Data Used? - Government, Business, Academic and Citizen Uses. EPA-260-R-002-004 Toxic Release Inventory Program Division, Office of Environmental Information, office of Information Analysis and Access, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, May 2003. Available at http://www.epa.gov/tri/guide_docs/ 2003_datausepaper.pdf.
34. Hogner, R. H. (1998). Community uses of PRTRs. In Proceedings of the OECD International Conference on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) - PRTRs: National and Global Responsibility. Series on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers No. 2. Tokyo, Japan: OECD Environment Directorate, Available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/1999docs.nsf/LinkTo/env- jm-mono(99)16-part1.
35. Environment Agency. (2002). Substances and Thresholds for the Environment Agency's Pollution Inventory. Environment-Agency Website, England. Available at www.environmentagency.gov.uk/commondata/105385/pi_criteria_878229.pdf.
36. Australian Government - Department of Environment & Heritage. (2005). List of Substances on the NPI. NPIWeb site. Available at http://www.npi.gov.au/about/list_of_subst.html.
37. Australian Government - Department of Environment & Heritage. (2002). NPI Industry Handbooks. NPI Web Site. Available at http://www.npi.gov. au/handbooks/pubs/hblist-5-jul-02.pdf.
38. Rae, I. D. (2000). Review of the National Environmental Protection Measure for the NationalPollutant Inventory. Available at http://www.ephc.gov.au/pdf/npi/npi_Rae_Report.pdf.
39. Terry, J. C., & Yandle, B. (1997). EPA's toxic release inventory: Stimulus and response. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(6), 433.
40. US-EPA. (1996). 1996 TRI Public Data Release. Available at http://www.epa.gov/triinter/tridata/tri96/pdr/chap1.pdf.
41. Scarlett, L. (1998). Chemical reduction - The EPA wants to reduce materials, not danger. Reason Online Journal. Available at http://reason.com/9803/col.scarlett.shtml.
42. Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). (1996). Putting the Pieces Together - The Status of Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers in North America. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Available at http://www.cec.org/ files/pdf/POLLUTANTS/ppte_EN.pdf.
43. US-EPA. (2002). The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) and Factors to Consider When Using TRI Data. US EPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/tri/ 2002 tri_brochure.pdf.
44. Jackson, J. (2000). A Citizen's Guide to the National Pollutant Release Inventory - Community Right to Know: How to Find Out What Toxics are Being Released into Your Neighborhood. Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Available at http://www.cielap.org/ pdf/npri/pdf.
45. Environment-Canada. (2005). Changes to NPRI Substance List. NPRI Web Site. Available at http://www.ec.gc.ca.pdb/querysite/substance_changes_e. cfm.
46. Harrison, K., & Antweiler, W. (2003). Incentives for pollution abatement: Regulation, regulatory threats, and non-governmental pressures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(3), 361.
47. Talitman, D., Tal, A., & Brenner, S. (2003). The devil is in the details: Increasing international law's influence on domestic environmental performance - The case of Israel and the Mediterranean sea. NYU Environmental Law Journal, 11(2), 414.
48. Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 98-113.
49. Konar, S. (1997). Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 109-124.
50. Scorse, J. (2005). Do State Pollution Rankings Affect Facility Emissions? Evidence from the U.S. Toxic Release Inventory. Available at http://are.nerkeley.edu/~karp/2004-2005_seminars/Scorse_state_pollution.pdf.
51. Fung, A., & O'Rourke, D. (2000). Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: Explaining and expanding the success of the toxic release inventory. Environmental Management, 25(2), 115.
52. Anderson, R. C., & Lohof, A. Q. (1997). The United States Experience with Economic Incentives in Environmental Pollution Control Policy. Environmental Law Institute. Washington, DC. Available at http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/webpages/ EconomicIncentivePollutionControl.html.
53. Jobe, M. M. (1999). The power of information: The example of the U.S. toxics release inventory. Journal of Government Information, 26(3), 187-195.
54. Graham, M. (2000). Regulation by shaming. Atlantic Monthly, 285(4), 36-41.
55. Stephan, M. (2002). Environmental information disclosure programs: They work, but why? Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 190-205.
56. Foulon, J., Lanoie, P., & Laplante, B. (1999). Incentives for Pollution Control: Regulation and(?) or(?) Information. World Bank Working Papers Series.
57. Bui, L. T. M., & Mayer, C. J. (2003). Regulation and capitalization of environmental amenities: Evidence from the toxic release inventory in Massachusetts. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(3), 693-708.
58. Grant, D., & Jones, A. W. (2004). Do manufactures pollute less under the regulation-through-information regime? What plant-level data tells us. Sociological Quarterly, 45(3), 471-486.
59. Graham, M., & Miller, C. (2001). Disclosure of toxic releases in the United States. Environment, 43(8), 9-20.
60. Toffel, M. W., & Marshall, J. D. (2004). Improving environmental performance assessment - A comparative analysis of weighting methods used to evaluate chemical release inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1-2), 143.
61. Cutter, S. L., Scott, M. S., & Hill, A. A. (2002). Spatial variability in toxicity indicators used to rank chemical risks. American Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 420.
62. Hertwich, E. G., Mateles, S. F., Pease, W. S., & McKones, T. E. (2001). Human toxicity potentials for life-cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20(4), 928-939.
63. Layton, D. W., Mallon, B. J., Rosenblatt, D. H., & Small, M. J. (1986). Deriving allowable daily intake for systematic toxicants lacking chronic toxicity data. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, (7), 96-112.
64. Vernon, D. (2005). Re: A Question Regarding NPI Data.
65. Senthil, V. (2006). Re: Several Researcher Questions Regarding TRI.
66. Hole, A. (2006). Re: Questions Regarding UK PI.
67. Pastor, M., Sadd, J., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2004). Waiting to inhale: The demographics of toxic air release facilities in 21st-century California. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 420-440.
68. Perlin, S., Setzer, W., Creason, J., & Sexton, K. (1995). Distribution of industrial air emissions by income and race in the United States: An approach using the toxic release inventory. Environmental Science and Technology, 29(1), 69-80.
69. Gray, G. (1999). Measure risk, not just emissions. Environment and Risk. Available at http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv22n4/gray.pdf.
70. Hartman, R., Huq, M., & Wheeler, D. (1997). Why Paper Mills Clean Up: Determinants of Pollution Abatement in Four Asian Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1710. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/ wbrwps/1710.html.
71. Hettige, H., Huq, M., & Pargal, S., Wheeler, D. L (1996). Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. Pergamon, 24(12), 1891-1904.
72. Howes, M. (2001). What's your poison? The Australian national pollutant inventory versus the US toxics release inventory. Australian Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 529-552.
73. Taylor, M. (1998). The gulf between a PRTR and the right-to-know: A detailed look at the chemical release inventory in England and Wales. In Proceedings of the OECD International Conference on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs). Series on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers No. 2. Tokyo. Available at www.unitar.org/cwm/publications/current/ prtr/wkshp/PRTRTokyo2.pdf.