Three-dimensional analysis of formation failure in congenital scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 562-567

  Nakajima, Akira ^a   Kawakami, Noriaki ^b   Imagama, Shiro ^b   Tsuji, Taichi ^b   Goto, Manabu ^b   Ohara, Tetsuya ^b  

^a Tokai Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers   (Japan)

^b Meijo Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

3 dimensional analysis; Computed tomography; Congenital scoliosis; Failure of formation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIPLE MALFORMATION SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE MALFORMATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33947156734     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256386.26757.ed     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McMaster MJ, Ohtsuka K. The natural history of congenital scoliosis: a study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1128-47.
2. McMaster MJ, David CV. Hemivertebra as a cause of scoliosis: a study of 104 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:588-95.
3. Moe JH, Winter RB, Bradford DS, et al. Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1978;131-202.
4. Winter RB, Moe JH, Eilers VE. Congenital scoliosis: a study of 234 patients treated and untreated. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1968;50:1-47.
5. Winter RB, Lonstein LE, Leonard AS, et al. Congenital Deformities of the Spine. Thieme-Stratton, 1983:1-17.
6. Charles HB, Kalen V. Three dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of congenital scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:632-7.
7. Hedequist DJ, Emans JB. The correlation of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions with operative findings in congenital scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:2531-4.
8. Newton PO, Hahn GW, Ficka KB, et al. Utility of three dimensional and multiplanar reformatted computed tomography for evaluation of pediatric congenital spine abnormalities. Spine 2002;27:844-50.
9. Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, et al. Single-stage excision of hemivertebra via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity. Spine 2002;27:110-5.
10. Ruf M, Harms J. Hemivertebra resection by posterior approach. Spine 2002;27:1116-23.
11. Bush CH, Kalen V. Three dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of congenital scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:632-7.
12. Nogami H, Ingalls TH. Pathogenesis of spinal malformations induced in the embryos of mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:1551-60.
13. Tanaka T, Uhthoff HK. The pathogenesis of congenita1 vertebral malformations. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:413-25.
14. Lehmann-Facius H. Die Keilwirbelbildung bei der kongenitalen Skoliose. Frankf Z Pathol 1925;31:489-99.
15. Tsou P, M'Yau A, Hodgson AR. Embryogenesis and prenatal development of congenital vertebral anomalies and their classification. Clin Orthop 1980;152:211-31.
16. Tanaka T, Uhthoff HK. Significance of resegmentation in the pathogenesis of vertebral body malformation. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:331-8.
17. Watanabe H. Congenital scoliosis and growth of the malformed vertebrae. In: Scoliosis 1979. San Diego: Academic Press, 1980:111-27.