Designers' utilization of and requirements on design for environment (DfE) methods and tools

Proceedings - Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Eco Design 2005

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 224-231

  Lindahl, Mattias ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Design for environment; Engineering designer; Methods and tools; Requirements

Indexed keywords

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

DESIGN FOR ENVIRONMENT; DESIGN-RELATED REQUIREMENTS; ENGINEERING DESIGNER;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33947153792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ECODIM.2005.1619207     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Lindahl, M. (2005), Engineering Designers' Requirements on Design for Environment Methods and Tools, in Industrial Engineering and Management. KTH: Stockholm, Sweden.
2. Jilderin, J. and H. Omberg (2004), Usability and demands on design engineering tools and methods utilized in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises - A different approach to understand the reasons behind the low utilization of DfE methods and tools. University of Linköping: Linköping, Sweden.
3. Rilegård, E. (2005), Criteria for good design for environment methods and tools - a study of small and medium size enterprises requirement (Swedish only). Environmental Technology and Management, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linköping University: Linköping, Sweden.
4. Bakker, C. (1995), Environmental Information for Industrial Designers, in PhD-Thesis. Delft University of Technology: Delft, Holland.
5. Simon, M., S. Evans, T.C. McAloone, A. Sweatman, T. Bhamra, and S. Poole (1998), Ecodesign Navigator - A Key resource in the Drive towards Environmentally Efficient Product Design. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University, Cranfield University & EPSRC.
6. Wrisberg, N., H.A. Udo de Haes, U. Triebswetter, P. Eder, and R. Clift (2000), ed.eds. Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
7. Ernzer, M. and H. Birkhofer (2002). Selecting Methods for Life Cycle Design Based on the Needs of a Company, in International Design Conference - Design 2002. Dubrovnik, Croatia.
8. Mathieux, F., G. Rebitzer, S. Ferrendier, M. Simon, and D. Froelich (2001), Ecodesign in the European Electr(on)ics Industry - An analysis of the current practices based on cases studies - An analysis of the current practices based on cases studies. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 1(4): p. pp. 233-245.
9. Gertsakis, J., H. Lewis, and C. Ryan (1997), A Guide to EcoReDesign - Improving the Environmental Performance of Manufactured Products. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Design at RMIT.
10. ISO 14 062 (2002), Environmental management -Integrating environmental aspects into product design and development. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, p. 24.
11. Ritzén, S. and M. Lindahl (2001). Selection and implementation - key activities to successful use of EcoDesign tools, in Proceedings EcoDesign 2001: Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan.
12. Ehrenfeld, J.R. and M.J. Lenox (1997), The Development and Implementation of DfE Programmes. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design., (1): p. 17-27.
13. Baumann, H., F. Boons, and A. Bragd (2002), Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5): p. 409-425.
14. Tukker, A., E. Haag, and P. Eder (2000), Eco-design: European state of the art - Part I: Comparative Analysis and Conclusions - An ESTO project report. European Commission -Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies: Brussels, Luxembourg, p. 60.
15. Ernzer, M., M. Lindahl, K. Masui, and T. Sakao (2003). An international study on Utilization of Design for Environment Methods (DfE) - a pre-srudy. in EcoDesign 2003: 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan: Union of EcoDesigners (Association of EcoDesign Societies, Japan).
16. Lindahl, M. (2003). Designer's utilization of DfE methods, in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on "Sustainable Consumption". Tokyo, Japan: The Society of Non-Traditional Technology (SNTT) and Research Center for Life Cycle Assessment (AIST).
17. Nutek (2002), Melodik for Miljöanpassad produktutveckling i små och medelstora företag - slutrapport från ett treårigt NU-TEK-program (Methodology for Design for Environment in small and medium sized enterprises - Final report from a three-year Nutek-program) - In Swedish. Nutek: Stockholm, Sweden.
18. Norell, M. (1992), Stödmetoder och samverkan i produktutveckling, in Department of Machine Elements. Royal Institute of Technology: Stockholm, Sweden.
19. Lindahl, M. and A.-M. Åkermark (2004), Experience of and requirements on methods for product development - An interview survey at a major Swedish vehicle company: Linköping, Sweden.
20. Ritzén, S. (2000), Integrating environmental aspects into product development - Proactive measures, in Integrated Product Development Division, Dept. of Machine Design. Royal Institute of Technology: Stockholm, Sweden.
21. Hill, T. (1995), Manufacturing Strategy, Text and Cases. London, UK: MacMillan Press Limited.
22. Lindahl, M. (2005), Engineering designers' experience of design for environment methods and tools - Requirement definitions from an interview study. Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, In press.
23. Lindahl, M., L. Skoglund, J. Svensson, and R. Karlsson (2003). Use and perception of Design for Environment (DfE) in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Sweden, in EcoDesign 2003: 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan: Union of EcoDesigners (Association of EcoDesign Societies, Japan).
24. Lindahl, M. (2004), User Requirements for Design for Environment methods and tools - Based on a web-based questionnaire survey. Journal of Sustainable Product Design, Submitted for publication.
25. Lindahl, M. (2001). Environmental effect analysis - how does the method stand in relation to lessons learned from the use of other design for environment methods. in Proceedings EcoDesign 2001: Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan.
26. Klein, L. (1994), Sociotechnical/organizational design, in Organisation and Management of Advanced Manufacturing, W. Karwowski and G. Salvendy, Editors. John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, US.
27. Nutek (2003), Sustainable products - new business through Design for Environment. Swedish Business Development Agency: Stockholm, Sweden.
28. Ullman, D.G. (1997), The Mechanical Design Process. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Stalk, G.J. and T.M. Hout (1990), Competing Against Time - How Time-Based Competition is Reshaping the Global Markets. New York, USA: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Inc. 285.
30. Lindahl, M. (2000), Environmental Effect Analysis - an approach to design for environment, in Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Technology. Royal Institute of Technology: Stockholm, Sweden.