Why metadata? Why me? Why now?

Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 19-29

  Schottlaender, Brian E C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cataloging community; Content standards; Encoding schema; Metadata standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947150654     PISSN: 01639374     EISSN: 15444554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J104v36n03_03     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging. 2000. Description and Access, Task Force on Metadata, Final Report (June Available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-meta6.html
2. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging. 2000. Description and Access, Task Force on Metadata, Final Report (June Available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-meta6.html
3. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging. 2000. Description and Access, Task Force on Metadata, Final Report (June Available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-meta6.html
4. Murtha, Baca, ed. 1998. Introduction to Metadata, Los, Angeles:Getty Research Institute. Available at http://getty.edu/research/institute/standards/intrometadata/
5. Iannella, Renato, and Campbell, Debbie. 1999. The A-Core:Metadata about Content Metadata (Internet-Draft, 30 June Available at http://metadata.net/admin/draft-iannella-admin-01.txt
6. Bearman, David, Miller, Eric, Rust, Godfrey, Trant, Jennifer, and Weibel, Stuart. 1999. A Common Model to Support Interoperable Metadata:Progress Report on Reconciling Metadata Requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI Communities D-Lib Magazine (January Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/bearman/01bearman.html
7. Eric, Miller. 1998. An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework D-Lib Magazine (May Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may98/miller/05miller.html
8. Carl, Lagoze. 1996. The Warwick Framework:A Container Architecture for Diverse Sets of Metadata D-Lib Magazine (July/August Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july96/lagoze/07lagoze.html
9. Kevin, Butterfield. Catalogers and the Creation of Metadata Systems available at http://www.oclc.org/oclc/man/colloq/butter.htm
10. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging. 1998. Description and Access, Task Force on Metadata and the Cataloging Rules, Final Report (August Available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-tei2.html
11. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging. 1998. Description and Access, Task Force on Metadata and the Cataloging Rules, Final Report (August Available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-tei2.html
12. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records:Final Report., Munchen:K.G. Saur.
13. Stuart, Weibel. 1999. The State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative D-Lib Magazine (April Available at:http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april99/04weibel.html
14. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. 2000. Committee on Cataloging:Description and Access. Task Force on Metadata, Final Report (June http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-meta6.html
15. David, Levy. 1994. “Fixed or Fluid? Document Stability and New Media”. In Proceedings of the 1994 European Conference on Hypermedia Technology 24–31. ACM Press
16. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging. 2000. Description and Access, Task Force on Metadata, Final Report (June Available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/ccs/ccda/tf-meta6.html