The influence of floral symmetry and pollination systems on flower size variation

Nordic Journal of Botany

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 593-598

  Ushimaru, Atushi ^a,b   Kikuchi, Satoshi ^a   Yonekura, Ryuji ^a   Maruyama, Atsushi ^a   Yanagisawa, Nao ^a   Kagami, Maiko ^a   Nakagawa, Michiko ^a   Mahoro, Suzuki ^a   Kohmatsu, Yukihiko ^a   Hatada, Aya ^a   Kitamura, Shumpei ^a   Nakata, Kensuke ^c  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NAGASAKI INSTITUTE OF APPLIED SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; POLLINATION; SELECTION;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 33947148543     PISSN: 0107055X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2004.tb01644.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baird, V. W. & Riopel, J. L. 1986. Life history studies of Conopholis americana (Orobanchaceae). - Amer. Mid. Nat. 116: 140-151.
2. Berg, R. L. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. - Evolution 14: 171-180.
3. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1995. Quantitative genetics of plants: the effect of the breeding system on genetic variability. - Evolution 49: 911-920.
4. Clay, K. & Levin, D. A. 1989. Quantitative variation in Phlox: comparison of selfing and outcrossing species. - Amer. J. Bot. 76: 577-588.
5. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection. - John Murray.
6. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. - Amer. Nat. 125: 1-15.
7. Fenster, C. B. 1991. Selection on floral morphology by hummingbirds. - Biotropica 23: 98-101.
8. Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C.H. 1993. Pollen removal from tristylous Pontederia cordata: effects of anther position and pollinator specialization. - Ecology 74: 1059-1072.
9. Kato, M. & Miura, R. 1996. Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community at a threatened natural lowland marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan. - Cont. Bio. Lab., Kyoto University 29: 1-48.
10. Kimata, M. 1978. Comparative studies on the reproductive systems of Mazus japonius and M. miquelii (Scrophulariaceae). - Plant Syst. Evo. 129: 243-253.
11. Kudo, H., Ishiguri, Y. & Kawano, S. 1996. Phenotypic plasticity in age and size and its effects on the integrated phenotypic expressions of life histor traits of Cardamine flexuosa (Cruciferae). - J. Evo. Bio. 9: 541-570.
12. Lloyd, D. G. & Webb, C. J. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigma in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. - New Zeal. J. Bot. 24: 135-162.
13. Momose, K. & Inoue, T. 1993. Pollination and factors limiting fruit set of chasmogamous flowers of an amphicarpic annual, Polygonum thunbergii (Polygonaceae). - Res. Pop. Ecol. 35: 79-93.
14. Morita, T. & Nigorikawa, T. 1999. Phenotypic plasticity of floral sex. - In: Ohara, M. (ed.), Natural history of flowers, pp. 227-242. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo. (In Japanese).
15. Neal, P. R., Dafni, A. & Giurfa, M. 1998. Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 345-373.
16. Okada, H. & Kubo, S. 1999. Differentiation of breeding systems in Ranunculus cantoniensis group in Japan. - Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 49: 81-88.
17. Potokina, E., Tomooka, N., Vaughan, D. A., Alexandrova, T. & Xu, R.-Q. 1999. Phylogeny of Vicia subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae) based on analysis of RAPDs and RFLP of PCR-amplified chloroplast genes. - Genet. Resources Crop Evo. 46: 149-161.
18. Pruvis, A. & Rambout, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. - Comp. Appl. Bio. 11: 247-251.
19. Rice, K. A., Donoghue, M. J. & Olmsted, R. G. 1997. Analyzing large data sets: rbcL 500 reviced. - Syst. Biol. 46: 554-563.
20. Sckemske, D. W. & Horvitz, C. C. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. - Evolution 43: 461-465.
21. Shibaike, H., Ishiguri, Y, & Kawano, S. 1995. Reproductive biology of Oxalis corniculata (Oxalidaceae): style length polymorphisms and breeding system of Japanese populations. - Plant Sp. Biol. 10: 83-93.
22. Stebbins, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 307-326.
23. Tucker, S. C. 1984. Origin of symmetry in flowers. - In: White, R. A. & Dickison, W. C. (eds), Contemporary problem in plant anatomy, pp. 351-395. Academic Press, London.
24. Ushimaru, A. & Imamura, A. 2002. Large variation in flower size of the myco-heterotrophic plant, Monotrophastrum globosum: effect of floral display on female reproductive success. - Plant Sp. Biol. 17: 147-153.
25. _ & Nakata, K. 2001. Evolution of flower allometry and its significance for pollination success in the deceptive orchid, Pogonia japonica. - Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: 1307-1311.
26. _, Itagaki, T. & Ishii, H. S. 2003. Variation in floral organ size depends on function: a test with Commelina communis, an andromonoecious species. - Evo. Eco. Res. 5: 615-622.
27. Wang, G. X., Miura, R. & Kusanagi, T. 1996. Isozyme variation in Monochoria korsakowii Regel et Maack and M. vaginalis (Burm. f.) Kunth (Pontederiaceae). - Weed Res., Japan 41: 255-263.
28. Webb, C. J. & Lloyd, D. G. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigma in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. - New Zeal. J. Bot. 24: 163-178.
29. Wolfe, L. M. & Krstolic, J. L. 1999. Floral symmetry and its influence on variance in flower size. - Amer. Nat. 154: 484-488.