Emancipatory teaching-learning philosophy and practice education in acute care: Navigating tensions

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 60-64

  Randall, Carla E ^a   Tate, Betty ^b   Lougheed, Mary ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

^b North Island College   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947145655     PISSN: 01484834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20070201-04     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen, D.G. (1990). The curriculum revolution: Radical re-visioning of nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 29, 312-316.
2. Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (1996). Wasting away: The undermining of Canadian health care. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
3. Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
4. Bevis, E.O. (1989a). The curriculum consequences: Aftermath of revolution. In Curriculum revolution: Reconceptualizing nursing education (pp. 115-134). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
5. Bevis, E.O. (1989b). On the road to excellence. Journal of Nursing Education, 28, 4-5.
6. Bevis, E.O. (1990). Has the revolution become the new religion? In Curriculum revolution: Redefining the student-teacher relationship (pp. 57-66). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
7. Bevis, E.O. (1993a). All in all, it was a pretty good funeral. Journal of Nursing Education, 32, 101-105.
8. Bevis, E.O. (1993b). Alliance for destiny: Education and practice. Nursing Management, 24(4), 56-61.
9. Bevis, E.O., & Clayton, G. (1988). Needed: Anew curriculum development design. Nurse Educator, 13(4), 14-18.
10. Bevis, E.O., & Murray, J.P. (1990). The essence of the curriculum revolution: Emancipatory teaching. Journal of Nursing Education, 29, 326-331.
11. Bevis, E.O., & Watson, J. (1989). Toward a caring curriculum: A new pedagogy for nursing. New York: National League for Nursing Press.
12. Campbell, M.L. (1990). Technology and nursing: A review and analysis of selected literature. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Nurses Association.
13. nd ed., pp. 252-260). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
14. th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
15. Collaborative Nursing Program in British Columbia. (2004). Collaborative curriculum guide. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Author.
16. Danner, K.C. (1990). Our voices, our visions. In Curriculum revolution: Redefining the student-teacher relationship (pp. 37-45). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
17. de Tornyay, R. (1991). Creating community among nurse educators. In Curriculum revolution: Community building and activism (pp. 7-28). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
18. Diekelmann, N. (2002). "Too much content...:" Epistemologies' grasp and nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 469-470.
19. Doane, G.A.H. (2002). Beyond behavioral skills to human-involved processes: Relational nursing practice and interpretive pedagogy. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 400-404.
20. Doane, G.H., & Varcoe, C. (2005). Family nursing as relational inquiry: Developing health-promoting practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
21. Gunby, S.S., Chally, P., Dorman, R.E., Grams, K.M., Kosowski, M.M., & Pless, B.S. (1991). Alice in wonderland: A metaphor for professional nursing education. In Curriculum revolution: Community building and activism (pp. 63-75). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
22. Harden, J. (1996). Enlightenment, empowerment and emancipation: The case for critical pedagogy in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 16, 32-37.
23. Hartrick, G. (1997). Relational capacity: The foundation for interpersonal nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 523-528.
24. Lindeman, C.A. (1989). Curriculum revolution: Reconceptualizing clinical nursing education. Nursing and Health Care, 10(1), 23-28.
25. Moccia, P. (1988). Curriculum revolution: An agenda for change. In Curriculum revolution: A mandate for change (pp. 53-63). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
26. Moccia, P. (1989). Curriculum reconceptualization: Integrating the voices of revolution. In Curriculum revolution: Reconceptualizing nursing education (pp. 135-144). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
27. Moccia, P. (1990). No sire, it's a revolution. Journal of Nursing Education, 29, 307-311.
28. National League for Nursing. (2003). Position statement: Innovation in nursing education: A call to reform. Retrieved November 27, 2006, from http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/PositionStatements/innovation.htm
29. Pitts, T.P. (1985). The covert curriculum. Nursing Outlook, 33, 37-39, 42.
30. Purkis, M.E. (1999). Embracing technology: An exploration of the effects of writing nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 6, 147-156.
31. Romyn, D.M. (2001). Disavowal of the behaviorist paradigm in nursing education: What makes it so difficult to unseat? Advances in Nursing Science, 23(3), 1-10.
32. Sandelowski, M. (1997). Knowing and forgetting: The challenge of technology for a reflexive practice science of nursing. In S.E. Thorne & V.E. Hayes (Eds.), Nursing praxis: Knowledge and action (pp. 69-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Tanner, C.A. (1990). Reflections on the curriculum revolution. Journal of Nursing Education, 29, 295-299.
34. Waters, V. (1991). A Frank Lloyd Wright context for nursing's curriculum revolution. In Curriculum revolution: Community building and activism (pp. 1-5). New York: National League for Nursing Press.