Prospective memory retrieval revisited

Dynamic Cognitive Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 305-332

  Graf, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

attention switching; cue noticing; cue singularizing; discrepancy detection; Prospective memory; task interruption

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947125866     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/4-431-27431-6_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I. M, & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: Evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology and Aging, 13, 405-423.
2. Andrzejewski, S. J., Moore, C. M., & Corvette, M. (1991). Prospective memory skill. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 304-306.
3. Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M.A. (Eds.). (1996). Prospective memory: Theory and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Brandimonte, M. A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). The effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 565-587.
5. Cohen, A., Dixon, R. A., Lindsay, D. S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). The effect of perceptual distinctiveness on the prospective and retrospective components of prospective memory in young and old adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 274-289.
6. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409-422). New York: Elsevier.
7. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 59-80.
8. Dobbs, A. R., & Rule, B. G. (1987). Prospective memory and self-reports of memory abilities in older adults. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 209-222.
9. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 717-126.
10. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and application (pp. 115-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Guynn, M. J. (1992). Agerelated deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology & Aging, 7, 471-478.
12. Ellis, J. (1996). Prospective memory of the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and application (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Ellis, J. A., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1993). Recollecting naturally-occurring intentions: A study of cognitive and affective factors. Memory, 1, 107-126.
14. Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 155-176.
15. Franconeri, S. L., & Simon, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999-1010.
16. Gao, J., & Graf, P. (2005, May). Retrieval processes for event cued prospective memory tasks. Presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, OR.
17. Graf, P., & Gao, J. (2004, November). Prospective memory retrieval with primed and unprimed cues. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
18. Graf, P., & Masson, M. E. J. (Eds.). (1993). Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Graf, P., & Uttl, B. (1998, April). Age differences in explicit episodic memory reflect changes in encoding processes. Presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
20. Graf, P., & Uttl, B. (2001). Prospective memory: A new focus for research. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 437-450.
21. Graf, P. (1999, May). Life-span changes in episodic memory: Encoding versus retrieval. Colloquium presented at the Department of Psychology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
22. Graf, P. (2004, August). Prospective memory. Invited "state of the art" lecture presented at the meeting of the International Congress of Psychology, Beijing, China.
23. Graf, P., Uttl, B., & Dixon, R. (2002). Pro-and retrospective memory in adulthood. In P. Graf & N. Ohta (Eds.), Lifespan memory development (pp. 257-282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Harris, J. E. (1984). Remembering to do things: A forgotten topic. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory: Actions and absentmindedness (pp. 71-92). London: Academic Press.
25. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). The automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
26. Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Phillips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A metaanalytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27-39.
27. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
28. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., & Brown, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56, 326-338.
29. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
30. Jacova, C. (2003). Intentions do not take care of themselves: Attentional and cognitive abilities required for prospective remembering (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B, 64, 2413.
31. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
32. Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9-31). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.
33. Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (1996). Varieties of intentions: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and application (pp. 23-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Lewine, R. R. (2002). To perse verate or not to perse verate: What's the question? Georgia Psychologist, 56, 17.
35. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
37. Mandler, G. (1991). Your face looks familiar but I can't remember your name: A review of dual process theory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdoch (pp. 207-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Mandler, G. (1994). Hypermnesia, incubation, and mind popping: On remembering without really trying. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 3-33). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39. Marsh, R., Hancock, T. W., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 604-610.
40. Maylor, E. A., Darby, R. J., Logie, R. H., Delia Sala, S., & Smith, G. (2002). Prospective memory across the lifespan. In P. Graf & N. Ohta (Eds.), Lifespan development of human memory (pp. 235-256). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
41. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctieness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
42. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14 (Special issue: New perspectives in prospective memory), S127-S144.
43. Meacham, J. A. (1982). A note on remembering to execute planned actions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3, 121-133.
44. Meacham, J. A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327-336). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
45. Meier, B., Morger, V., & Graf, P. (2003). Competition between automatic and controlled processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 309-319.
46. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93-148). Oxford, England: Erlbaum.
47. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
48. Moscovitch, M. (1992). A neuropsychological model of memory and consciousness. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (2nd ed.) (pp. 5-22). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49. Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology, 8, 524-534.
50. Muter, P. (1978). Recognition failure of recallable words in semantic memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 9-12.
51. Otani, H., Landau, J. D., Libkuman, T. M., St. Louis, J. P., Kazen, J. K., & Throne, G. W. (1997). Prospective memory and divided attention. Memory, 5, 343-360.
52. Park, D. C. (1999). Aging and the controlled and automatic processing of medical information and medical intentions. In D. C. Park, R. W. Morrell, & K. Shifren (Eds.), Processing of medical information in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Pillsbury, W. B., & Raush, H. L. (1943). An extension of the Kohler-Restorff inhibition phenomenon. American Journal of Psychology, 56, 293-298.
54. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
55. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
56. Savchuk, K., Khan, Z., Lee, J., & Graf, P. (2004, May). Prospective memory: Cues and Qs. Presented at the annual meeting of NO WC AM, Victoria, British Columbia.
57. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
58. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.
60. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
61. Uttl, B., & Graf, P. (1999, November). Pro-and retrospective memory. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
62. Uttl, B., & Graf, P. (1998, April). Age influences the amount of information encoded and remembered about complex natural scenes. Presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
63. Uttl, B., & Ohta, N. (2004, March). Cue centrality and repetition enhance eventcued prospective memory. Presented at the Tsukuba International Conference on Memory, Tsukuba City, Japan.
64. Uttl, B. (2004, submitted). Age-related changes in event-cued visual and auditory prospective memory proper.
65. Uttl, B., Graf, P., Miller, J., & Tuokko, H. (2001). Pro-and retrospective memory in late adulthood. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 451-472.
66. Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849-857.
67. von Restorff, H. (1933). Uber die wirkung von bereichsbildungen im spurenfeld [On the effect of spheres formations in the trace field]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299-342.
68. Whittlesea B. W., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165.
69. Whittlesea B. W., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy- attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 3-13.
70. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 14-33.
71. Woodward, T. S., Meier. B., Tipper, C., & Graf, P. (2003). Bivalency is costly: Bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding. Experimental Psychology, 50, 233-238.
72. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture of attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 616-681.
73. Zhao, J., & Yang, Z. (2002). Controlled, strategic, and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval. Psychological Science (China), 25, 523-526.