Effects of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus cereus var. toyoi on the morphology of the intestinal mucous membrane in piglets

Biologia

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 803-809

  Reiter, Katja ^a   Eggebrecht, Susanne ^a   Drewes, Barbara ^a   Riess, Michael ^a   Weyrauch, Karl Dietrich ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Intestinal; Morphology; Piglet; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BACILLUS CEREUS; BACILLUS CEREUS BIOVAR TOYOI; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM;

EID: 33947123051     PISSN: 00063088     EISSN: 13369563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-006-0161-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. BAUM, B., LIEBLER-TENORIO, E.M., ENSS, M.L., POHLENZ, J.F. & BREVES, G. 2002. Saccharomyces boulardii and Bacillus cereus var. toyoi influence the morphology and the mucins of the intestine of pigs. Z. Gastroenterol. 40: 277-284.
2. BENGMARK, S. 2000. Colonic food: pre- and probiotics. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95 (Suppl): 5-7.
3. BOCOURT, R., SAVON, L., DIAZ, J., BRIZUELA, M.A, SERRANO, P., PRATS, A. & ELIAS, A. 2004. Effect of the probiotic activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on productive and health indicators of piglets. Cuban J. Agric. Sci. 38: 75-79.
4. CERA, K.R., MAHAN, D.C., CROSS, R.F., REINHART, G.A. & WHITEMOYER, R.E. 1988. Effect of age, weaning and post-weaning diet on small intestinal growth and jejunal morphology in young swine. J. Anim. Sci. 66: 574-584.
5. th International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, Banff, AB, Canada. 2: 262-264.
6. FERNANDEZ-ESTIVARIZ, C., GU, L.H., GU, L., JONAS, C.R., WALLACE, T.M., PASCAL, R.R., DEVANEY, K.L., FARRELL, C.L., JONES, D.P., PODOLSKY, D.K. & ZIEGLER T.R. 2003. Trefoil peptide expression and goblet cell number in rat intestine: effects of kgf and fasting-refeeding. Am. J. Physiol. Regulator. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 284: R564-R573.
7. FULLER, R. 1989. A review: probiotics in man and in animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66: 365-378.
8. GORBACH, S. 2000. Probiotics and gastrointestinal health. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95: 2-4.
9. GHADBEN, G.S. 2002. Probiotics in broiler production - a review. Arch. Geflugelkunde 66: 49-58.
10. GIBSON, G.R. 2004. From probiotics to prebiotics and a healthy digestive system. J. Food Sci. 69: M141-M143.
11. GÖRKE, B. 2000. Untersuchungen der Schleimhautmorphologie im Dünn-und Dickdarm nach oraler Applikation von Saccaromyces boulardii und Bacillus cereus var. toyoi beim Schwein. Vetmed dissertation Hannover, Germany.
12. GU, X. & LI, D. 2004. Effect of dietary crude protein level on villous morphology, immune status and histochemistry parameters of digestive tract in weaning piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 114: 113-126.
13. HERICH. R., BOMBA, A., NEMCOVA, R. & GANCARCIKOVA, S. 1999. The influence of short-term and continuous administration of Lactobacillus casei on basic haematological and immunological parameters in gnotobiotic piglets. Food Agric. Immunol. 11: 287-295.
14. HUANG, C.H., QIAO, S.Y., LI, D.F., PIAO, X.S. & REN, J.P.2004. Effects of lactobacilli on the performance, diarrhea incidence, VFA concentration and gastrointestinal microbial flora of weaning pigs. Asian-Austr. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 401-409.
15. JADAMUS, A., VAHJEN, W., SCHÄFER, K. & SIMON, O. 2002. Influence of the probiotic strain Bacillus cereus var. toyoi on the development of enterobacterial growth and on selected parameters of bacterial metabolism in digesta samples of piglets. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 86: 42-54.
16. JAHN, H., ULLRICH, R., SCHNEIDER, T., LIEHR, R., SCHIEFER-DECKER, L., HOLST, H. & ZEITZ, M. 1996. Immunological and trophical effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on the small intestine in healthy human volunteers. Digestion 57: 95-104.
17. KLEESSEN, B., HARTMANN, L. & BLAUT, M. 2003. Fructans in the diet cause alterations of intestinal mucosal architecture, released mucins and mucosa-associated bifidobacteria in gnotobiotic rats. Br. J. Nutr. 89: 597-606.
18. KLEIN, U. & SCHMIDTS, H.L. 1997. Zum Einfluss des Bioregulators Paciflor auf die Morphologie der Dünndarmmukosa beim Schwein. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 6: 41.
19. LALLES, J.P., MONTAGNE, L., PLUT, C. & TOULLEC, R. 2001. Influence of dietary protein concentration on the morphology and enzyme activities of the small intestine of the pre-ruminant calf. Anim. Sci. 73: 571-578.
20. LANGHOUT, D.J., SCHUTTE, J.B., VANLEEUWEN, P., WIEBEN-GA, J. &. TAMMINGA, S. 1999. Effect of dietary high-and low-methylated citrus pectin on the activity of the ileal microflora and morphology of the small intestinal wall of broiler chicks. Br. Poultry Sci. 40: 340-347.
21. MARTEAU, P., LEPAGE, P., MANGIN, I., SUAU, A., DORE, J. POCHART, P. & SEKSIK, P. 2004. Gut flora and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 20: 18-23.
22. MARTEAU, P. & SEKSIK, P. 2001. Probiotics and prebiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterologie Clinique Et Biologique 25: C94-C97.
23. MEKBUNGWAN, A., YAMAUCHI K. & THONGWITTAYA, N. 2003. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in growing pigs fed soybean and pigeon pea seed meals. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 755-760.
24. MELIN, L. & WALLGREN, P. 2002. Aspects on feed related prophylactic measures aiming to prevent post weaning diarrhoea in pigs. Acta Vet. Scand. 43: 231-245.
25. MILLER, B.G., JAMES, P.S., SMITH, M.W. & BOURNE, F.J. 1986. Effect of weaning on the capacity of pig intestinal villi to digest and adsorb nutrients. J. Agric. Sci. 107: 579-589.
26. MITJANS, M. & FERRER, R. 2004. Morphometric study of the guinea pig small intestine during development. Microscopy Res. Techn. 63: 206-214.
27. O'SULLIVAN, G., KELLY, C., O'HALLORAN, P., COLLINS, S., COLLINS, J. K., DUNNE, C. & SHANAHAN, F. 2005. Probiotics: an emerging therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 11: 3-10.
28. PIEL, C., MONTAGNE, L., SEVE, B. & LALLES, J.P. 2005. Increasing digesta viscosity using carboymethylcellulose in weaned piglets stimulates ileal goblet cell numbers and maturation. J. Nutr. 135: 86-91.
29. PLUSKE, J.R., WILLIAMS, I.H. & AHERNE, F.X. 1996. Villous height and crypt depth in piglets in response to increases in intake of cows' milk after weaning. Anim. Sci. 62: 145-158.
30. REUTER, G. 2001. Probiotics - possibilities and limitations of their application in food, animal feed, and in pharmaceutical preparations for man and animals. Berl. Münch. Tierärzt. Wochenschr. 114: 410-419.
31. ROMEIS, B. 1989. Mikroskopische Technik, 17 Verbesserte Auflage, Urban und Schwarzenberg, München, 697 pp.
32. SCHAREK, L., GUTH, J., REITER, K., WEYRAUCH,K.D., TARAS, D., SCHWERK, P., SCHIERACK, P., SCHMIDT, M.F.G., WIELER, L.H. & TEDIN, K. 2005. Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 105: 151-161.
33. TUCH, K. & AMTSBERG, G. 1973. Zottenstrukturen im Dünndarm des Schweines. Stereolupenmikroskopische Befunde. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin 20 A (Heft 6): 503-518.
34. VAN LEEUWEN, P., MOUWEN, J.M., VAN DER KLIS J.D. & VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. 2004. Morphology of the small intestinal mucosal surface of broilers in relation to age, diet formulation, small intestinal microflora and performance. Br. Poultry Sci. 45: 41-48.
35. VENTE-SPREEUWENBERG, M.A.M., VERDONK, J.M., BAKKER, G.C.M., BEYNEN, A.C. & M. VERSTEGEN, W.A. 2004. Effect of dietary protein source on feed intake and small intestinal morphology in newly weaned piglets. Livestock Prod. Sci. 86: 169-177.
36. VAHJEN, W., JADAMUS, A. & SIMON, O. 2002. Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on selected bacterial groups in the small intestine of growing turkey poults. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 6: 419-129.
37. VERMA, D.,. MALIK, M.R, SHRIVASTAVA, A.M. & PARMAR, M. 1999. Histogenesis of intestinal villi in fowl (Gallus domesticus). Ind. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 902-904.
38. WANG, L., LI, J., LI, Q., ZHANG, J. & DUAN, X.L. 2003. Morphological changes of cell proliferation and apoptosis in rat jejunal mucosa at different ages. World J. Gastroenterol. 9: 2060-2064.
39. WIESE, F., SIMON, O. & WEYRAUCH, K.D. 2003. Morphology of the small intestine of weaned piglets and a novel method for morphometric evaluation. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 32: 102-109.