Risk perception and personality facets

Risk Analysis

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 171-185

  Chauvin, Bruno ^a   Hermand, Danièle ^b   Mullet, Etienne ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

^c PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d NONE   (France)

Author keywords

France; Personality facets; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

DRUG DELIVERY; HAZARDS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH HAZARDS;

EDUCATIONAL LEVEL; PERSONALITY FACETS; POLLUTANTS; PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

DRUG; HAZARD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION;

ADDICTION; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; ENERGY YIELD; GENDER; IMAGINATION; MEDICAL CARE; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; POLLUTANT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WEAPON;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33947117463     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00867.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Barnett, J., & Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Analysis, 21, 171-178.
2. Boholm, A. (1998). Comparative studies of risk perception: A review of twenty years of research. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 135-163.
3. Booth-Kewley, S., & Vickers, R. R. (1994). Association between major domains of personality and health behavior. Journal of Personality, 62, 281-298.
4. Bouyer, M., Bagdassarian, S., Chaabane, S., & Mullet, E. (2001). Personality correlates of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 21, 457-465.
5. Brenot, J., Bonnefous, N., & Marris, C. (1998). Testing the cultural theory of risk in France. Risk Analysis, 18, 729-739.
6. Brislin, R. W. (2000). Some methodological concerns in intercultural and cross-cultural research. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Understanding Culture's Influence on Behavior, 2nd ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt.
7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Neo-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI): Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307-330.
9. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
10. Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspective (pp.1-20). Guilford Press.
11. Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Reanalysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149-160.
12. Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
13. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101-1108.
14. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
16. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
17. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
18. Gustafson, P. E. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18, 805-811.
19. Hampson, S. E., Andrews, J. A., Barckley, M., Lichtenstein, E., & Lee, M. E. (2000). Conscientiousness, perceived risk, and risk-reduction behaviors: A preliminary study. Health Psychology, 19, 496-500.
20. Helmreich, R. L., Foushee, H. C., Benson, R., & Russini, W. (1986). Cockpit resource management: Exploring the attitude-performance linkage. Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine, 57, 1198-1200.
21. Hermand, D., Karsenty, S., Py, Y., Guillet, L., Chauvin, B., Simeone, A., Munoz Sastre, M. T., & Mullet, E. (2003). Risk target: An interactive context factor in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23, 821-828.
22. Hermand, D., Mullet, E., & Rompteaux, L. (1999). Societal risk perception among children, adolescents, adults, and elderly people. Journal of Adult Development, 6, 137-143.
23. Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 63, 146-163.
24. Howard, P. J., & Howard, J. M. (1995). An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model of Personality for Human Resources Professionals. Retrieved December, 2004, from Center for Applied Cognitive Studies (CentACS) (http://www.centacs.com/quickstart.htm).
25. Källmén, H. (2000). Manifest anxiety, general self-efficacy and locus of control as determinants of personal and general risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 3, 111-120.
26. Karpowicz-Lazreg, C., & Mullet, E. (1993). Societal risks as seen by the French public. Risk Analysis, 13, 253-258.
27. Kouabenan, D. R. (1998). Beliefs and the perception of risks and accidents. Risk Analysis, 18, 243-252.
28. Lemos Giráldez, S., & Fidalgo Aliste, A. M. (1997). Personality dispositions and health-related habits and attitudes: A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Personality, 11, 197-209.
29. Macri, D., & Mullet, E. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception: A typological approach. Unpublished manuscript.
30. Mardberg, B., Nienmaa, P., Hillström, B., & Carlstedt, B. (1994). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Manual. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget.
31. Mullet, E., Duquesnoy, C., Raiff, P., Fahrasmane, R., & Namur, E. (1993). The evaluative factor of risk perception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1594-1605.
32. Mullet, E., Lazreg, C., Candela, C., & Neto, F. (2005). The Scandinavian way of perceiving societal risks. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 19-30.
33. Palmer, C. G. S. (2003). Risk perception: Another look at the "white male" effect. Health, Risk & Society, 5, 71-83.
34. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
35. Pilisuk, M., & Acredolo, C. (1988). Fear of technological hazards: One concern or many? Social Behaviour, 3, 17-24.
36. Rogers, G. O. (1997). The dynamics of risk perception: How does perceived risk respond to risk events? Risk Analysis, 17, 745-757.
37. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggings (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 21-50). New York: Guilford.
38. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2002). Assessing the big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 29-58). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
39. Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the big-five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613-627.
40. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovitch, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353-362.
41. Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 1-11.
42. Sjöberg, L. (2003). Distal factors in risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 6, 187-211.
43. Sjöberg, L., & af Wahlberg, A. (2002). Risk perception and new ages beliefs. Risk Analysis, 22, 751-764.
44. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
45. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the risks. Environment, 21, 14-20; 36-39.
46. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risks. In R. C. Schwing & W. A. Alberts, Jr. (Eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough? (pp. 181-214). New York: Plenum Press.
47. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. In R. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology (pp. 91-125). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
48. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
49. Viklund, M. (2003). Trust and risk perception in Western Europe: A cross-national study. Risk Analysis, 23, 727-738.
50. Vollrath, M., Knoch, D., & Cassano, L. (1999). Personality, risky health behaviour, and perceived susceptibility to health risks. European Journal of Personality, 13, 39-50.
51. Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2002). Who takes health risks? A probe into eight personality types. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1185-1197.
52. Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why. Daedalus, 112, 41-50.