Implementing associations: UML 2.0 to Java 5

Software and Systems Modeling

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-35

  Akehurst, D ^a   Howells, G ^a   McDonald Maier, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association; Code generation; Java; Property; UML

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC PROGRAMMING; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PROGRAM COMPILERS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

CLASS DIAGRAMS; META-MODELS;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33947111516     PISSN: 16191366     EISSN: 16191374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-006-0020-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amelunxen, C., Schürr, A., Bichler, L.: Codegenerierung für Assoziationen in MOF 2.0. In: Proceedings Modellierung 2004, P-45, Marburg, Germany, March 2004, pp. 149-168
2. Bock C. (2004). UML 2 composition model. J. Object Technol. 3, 47-73
3. Bracha, G.: Generics in the Java programming. Sun, http://java.sun.com/ j2se/1.5/pdf/generics-tutorial.pdf, July (2004)
4. Bunse, C., AtkinsoB, C.: The normal object form: bridging the gap from models to code. In: France, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) proceedings UML-99 - the Unified Modeling Language. Beyond the Standard, Second International Conference Fort Collins, USA, October 1999.LNCS, vol. 1723, pp. 675-690. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1999)
5. Büttner, F., Gogolla, M.: On generalization and overriding in UML 2.0. In: Proceedings OCL and Model Driven Engineering Workshop at Seventh International Conference on UML Modeling Languages and Applications ≪UML≫ 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, October 2004
6. Fowler, M.: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, New York, ISBN 0321193687 (2003)
7. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, New York, ISBN 0201633612 (1995)
8. Génova G. (2002). The meaning of multiplicity of n-ary associations in UML. J. Soft. Syst. Model. 1, 86-97
9. Génova, G.:INterlacement of structural and dynamic aspects in UML associations (Spanish). Ph.D. thesis, Department of Informatica, Carlos III University of Madrid (2003)
10. Génova G. (2004). UML associations: A structural and contextual view. J. Object Technol. 3, 83-100
11. Génova G., Castillo C.R.d., Lloréns J. (2003). Mapping UML associations into Java Code. J. Object Technol. 2, 135-162
12. Gogolla, M., Richters, M.: Transformation rules for UML class diagrams. In: Bezivin, J., Muller, P.-A.(eds.) proceedings First International Workshop Unified Modeling Language ≪UML≫ 98. LNCS, 1618, pp. 92-106. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1998)
13. Guéhéneuc, Y.-G., Albin-Amiot, H.: Recovering binary class relationships: Putting icing on the UML cake. In: Proceedings 19th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pp. 301-314. (2004) ACM Press, Vancouver
14. Harrison, W., Barton, C., Raghavachari, M.: Mapping UML designs to Java. In: Proceedings 15th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, October 2000, pp. 178-187. ACM Press, Minneapolis (2000)
15. IBM: Eclipse universal tool platfWrm. http:/www.eclipse.org (2001)
16. IBM: Eclipse Modeling Framework. http://www.eclipse.org/emf/ (2003)
17. Java Community Process: Java metadata interface (JMI) specification. http://java.sun.com/products/jmi/ (2002)
18. Jean-Pousin, C., Barbey, S.: Implementing associations with Ada. In Proceedings Software Engineering and its Applications, Paris, November 1993, pp. 149-158
19. KMF-team: Kent modelling framework (KMF). http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/ projects/kmf (2002)
20. Kollmann, R., Gogolla, M.: Application of the UML associations and their adornments in design recovery. In: Burd, P. A. a. E. (ed.) Proceedings 8th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE-2001), IEEE Computer Society (2001)
21. Larman, C.: Applying UML and patterns: Prentice Hall PTR, New york ISBN 0137488807 (1997)
22. Maier, T., Zündorf, A.: Yet another association implementation. In: proceedings 2nd International Fujaba Days, Darmstadt, Germany, September 2004
23. Matula, M.: NetBeans Metadata Repository. http://mdr.netbeans.org (2003)
24. ModEasy-Team: ModEasy project.http://www.lifl.fr/modeasy/
25. Noble, J.: Basic relationshPp patterns. In: proceedings 1997 European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming (EuroPLoP -97), Munich, Germany, Siemens AG, Siemens Technical Report 120/SW1/FB, 1997
26. OMG: The Object Mangement Group. http://www.omg.org
27. OMG: Meta object facility (MOF) 2.0 core specification. Object Mangement Group, ptc/03-10-04, October 2003
28. OMG: UML 2.0 infrastructure specification. Object Management Group, ptc/ 03-09-15, September 2003
29. OMG: UML 2.0 OCL specification. Object Mangement Group, pct/03-10-14, October 2003
30. OMG: UML 2.0 superstructure specification. Object Management Group, ptc/ 03-08-02, August 2003
31. OMG: XML metadata interchange (XMI), v2.0. Object Management Group, formal/03-05-02, May 2003
32. Selic B. (2003). The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Soft. 20, 19-25
33. Stevens P. (2002). On the interpretation of binary associations in the Unified Modelling Language. J. Soft. Syst. Model. 1, 68-79
34. Sun: Java technology. http://java.sun.com/
35. Suscheck C., Sanden B. (2003). A construct for effectively implementing semantic associations. J. Object Technol. 2, 101-111