Differential response of etiolated pea seedlings to inoculation with rhizobacteria capable of utilizing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate or L-methionine

Journal of Microbiology

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-20

  Shaharoona, Baby ^a   Arshad, Muhammad ^a   Khalid, Azeem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

1 aminocyclopropane 1 carboxylate; ACC deaminase; Ethylene; L methionine; Pea seedlings; Rhizobacteria

Indexed keywords

1 AMINOCYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLATE DEAMINASE; 1 AMINOCYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLIC ACID; 1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLATE DEAMINASE; 1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLIC ACID; AMINO ACID; ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; LYASE; METHIONINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACINETOBACTER CALCOACETICUS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYMOLOGY; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PEA; PLANT ROOT; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; SEEDLING;

ACINETOBACTER CALCOACETICUS; AMINO ACIDS, CYCLIC; CARBON-CARBON LYASES; ETHYLENES; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; METHIONINE; PEAS; PLANT ROOTS; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; SEEDLING; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

ACINETOBACTER CALCOACETICUS; PISUM SATIVUM; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; RHIZOBIALES;

EID: 33947110573     PISSN: 12258873     EISSN: 12258873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abeles, F.B., P.W. Morgan, and M.E. Saltveit, Jr. 1992. Ethylene in plant biology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA
2. Akhtar, M.J., M. Arshad, A. Khalid, and M.H. Mahmood. 2005. Substrate-dependent biosynthesis of ethylene by rhizosphere soil fungi and its influence on etiolated pea seedlings. Pedobiologia 49, 211-219.
3. Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, Jr. 1988. Influence of ethylene produced by soil microorganisms on etiolated pea seedlings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 2728-2732.
4. Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, Jr. 1998. Plant-growth regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Adv. Agron. 62, 145-151.
5. Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, Jr. 2002. Ethylene: agricultural sources and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, USA
6. Barry, C.S., E.A. Fox, H. Yen, S. Lee, T. Ying, D. Grierson, and J.J. Giovannoni. 2001. Analysis of ethylene response in the epinastic mutant of tomato. Plant Physiol. 127, 58-66.
7. Belimov, A.A., V.I. Safronova, and T. Mimura. 2002. Response of spring rape (Brassica napus var. oleifera L.) to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing-1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase depends on nutrient status of the plant. Can. J. Microbiol. 48, 189-199.
8. Bleecker, A.B., M.A. Estelle, C. Sommeruille, and H. Kende. 1988. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241, 1086-1089.
9. Chen, Q.C. and A.B. Bleecker. 1995. Analysis of ethylene signal-transduction kinetic associated with seedling-growth response and chitinase induction in wild type and mutant Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 108, 597-607.
10. Dworkin, M. and J. Foster. 1958. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. J. Bacteriol. 75, 592-601.
11. Flores-Vargas, R.D. and G.W. O'Hara. 2006. Isolation and characterization of rhizosphere bacteria with potential for biological control of weeds in vineyards. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100, 946-954.
12. Ghosh, S., J.N. Penterman, R.D. Little, R. Chavez, and B.R. Glick. 2003. Three newly isolated plant growth-promoting bacilli facilitate the seedling growth of canola, Brassica campestris. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 41, 277-281.
13. Glick, B.R., D.M. Penrose, and J. Li. 1998. A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J. Theor. Biol. 190, 63-68.
14. Guzman, P. and J.R. Ecker. 1990. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Am. Soc. Plant Physiol. 2, 513-523.
15. Ince, J.E. and C.J. Knowles. 1986. Ethylene formation by cell free extract of Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 146, 151-158.
16. Jia, Y.J, Y. Kakuta, M. Sugawara, T. Igarashi, N. Oki, M. Kisaki, T. Shoji, Y. Kanetuna, T. Horita, H. Matsui, and M. Honma. 1999. Synthesis and degradation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by Penicillium ctrinum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 63, 542-549.
17. Khalid, A., M.J. Akhtar, M.H. Mahmood, and M. Arshad. 2006. Effect of substrate-dependent microbial produced ethylene on plant growth. Microbiology 75, 231-236
18. Khalid, A., M. Arshad, and Z.A. Zahir. 2004. Screening plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96, 473-480.
19. Li, J., D.H. Ovakim, T.C. Charles, and B.R. Glick. 2000. An ACC deaminase minus mutant of Enterobacter cloacae UW4 no longer promotes root elongation. Curr. Microbiol. 41, 101-105.
20. Lürssen, K., K. Naumann, and R. Schröder. 1979. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid an intermediate of the ethylene biosynthesis in higher plants. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 92, 285-294.
21. McKeon, T.A., N.E. Hoffmann, and S.F. Yang. 1982. The effect of plant-hormone pretreatments on ethylene production and synthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in water-stressed wheat leaves. Planta 155, 437-443.
22. McKeon, T.A., J.C. Fernandez-Maculet, and S.F. Yang. 1995. Biosynthesis and metabolism of ethylene, p. 118-139. In P.J. Davies (ed.), Plant Hormones, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-1995. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
23. Nagatsu, T. and K. Yagi. 1966. A simple assay of monoamine oxidase and D-amino acid oxidase by measuring ammonia. J. Biochem. 60, 219-221.
24. Nazli, Z.H., M. Arshad, and A. Khalid. 2003. 2-Keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid-dependent biosynthesis of ethylene in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 37, 130-135.
25. Neljubow, D. 1901. Über die horizontale nutation der stengel von Pisum sativum und einiger anderer pflanzen. Beih. Bot. Zentralbl. 10, 128-138.
26. Penrose, D.M. and B.R. Glick. 2001. Levels of 1-aminocyclopropane-1- carboxylic acid (ACC) in exudates and extracts of canola seeds treated with plant growth-promoting bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 41, 368-372.
27. Primrose, S.B. 1977. Evaluation of the role of methional, 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid and peroxidase in ethylene formation by Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Mircrobiol. 98, 519-528.
28. Reid, M.S. 1995. Ethylene in plant growth, development and senescence, p. 486-508. In P.J. Davies (ed.), Plant Hormone, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
29. Shaharoona, B., M. Arshad, and Z.A. Zahir. 2006a. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase on maize (Zea mays L.) growth under axenic conditions and on nodulation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 42, 155-159.
30. Shaharoona, B., M. Arshad, Z.A. Zahir, and A. Khalid. 2006b. Performance of Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2971-2975.
31. Simons, M., A.J. van der Bij, I. Brand, L.A. de Weger, C.A. Wijffelman, and B.J.J. Lugtenberg. 1996. Gnotobiotic system for studying rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas bacteria. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9, 600-607.
32. Ton, J., S. Davison, S.C.M. van Wees, L.C. van Loon, and C.M.J. Pieterse. 2001. The Arabidopsis ISRI locus controlling rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance is involved in ethylene signaling. Plant Physiol. 125, 652-661.
33. Wang, C., E. Knill, B.R. Glick, and G. Defagox. 2000. Effect of transferring 1-aminocycloproane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth promoting and disease suppressive capacities. Can. J. Microbiol. 46, 898-907.