Ecodesign operationalization and company performance in electronics industry

Proceedings - Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Eco Design 2005

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 807-813

  Pascual, Oriol ^a   Stevels, Ab ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecodesign; Ecovalue; Product performance

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MARKETING;

ECODESIGN; ECOVALUE; PRODUCT PERFORMANCE;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 33947102522     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ECODIM.2005.1619354     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Pascual, O., C. Boks, and A. Stevels. Electronics Ecodesign Empirically Studied. in Ecodesign 2003. 2003. Tokyo.
2. Pascual, O., C. Boks, and A. Stevels. Measuring Implementation of Ecodesign. in Ecodesign 2003. 2003. Tokyo.
3. Pascual, O., C. Boks, and A. Stevels. Ecodesign Standardization in Electronics Industry, in EIASM New Product Development and Management. 2005. Copenhagen.
4. Lebas, M. and K. Euske, A conceptual and operational delineation of performance, in Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. 2002: Cambridge University Press.
5. Simmons, R., Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. 2000: Prentice Hall.
6. Kaplan, R. and D.P. Norton, The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992(January-Febraury): p. 71-79.
7. Bontis, N., et al., The knowledge toolbox: a review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, 1999. 17(4).
8. Brown, M., Keeping Score: using the right metrics to drive world class performance. Quality Resources. 1996.
9. Lynch, R.L. and K.F. Cross, Measure-up the essential guide to measuring business performance. 1991, London: Mandarin.
10. Neely, A., et al., Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2000. 20 (10).
11. Florida, R., What makes companies green? organizational and geographic factors in the adoption of environmental practices. Economic Geography, 2001.
12. Ilinitch, A., N. Soderstrom, and T. Thomas, Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1998(17): p. 383-408.
13. ISO, Environmental Performance Evaluation ISO/DIS 14031. 1998.
14. Herrmman, C., M.A. Wolf, and P. Eyerer. Measuring Sustainability Means More than Energy Consumption and Waste, in CIRP-Life Cycle Seminar, 2002. 2002.
15. ECOLIFE, T.N., Environmentally Improved Product Design Case Studies of the European Electrical and Electronics Industry. 2002.
16. Huisman, J. and A. Stevels. Eco-efficiency of Take-back and Recycling, Application in Stakeholder Discussions, in Care Innovation 2002. 2002.
17. Deming, W.E., Quality, Productivity, and Competitive Position. 1982, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
18. Reinhardt, F., Down to Earth. 2000, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Kolk, A., Economics of Environmental Management, ed. F.T.-P. Hall. 2000, Harlow (UK): Pearson Education.