Sensitivity and specificity of Heidelberg retinal tomography II parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucomatous damage: Effect of disc size

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 113-118

  Uysal, Yusuf ^a   Bayer, Atilla ^a   Erdurman, Cüneyt ^a   Kiliç, Selim ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Disc size; Glaucoma diagnosis; Retinal tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL FIELD;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33847788168     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01393.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA et al. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118: 9-15.
2. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph. J Glaucoma 1993; 2: 101-3.
3. Rohsrschneider K, Burk ROW, Kruse FE et al. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser scanning device. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1044-9.
4. Sihota RJ, Gulati V, Agarwal HC, Saxena R, Sharma A, Pandey RM. Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II stereometric parameters. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 321-8.
5. Anton A, Yamagishi N, Zangwill L, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 436-46.
6. Weinreb RN, Lusky M, Bartsch DU et al. Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 636-8.
7. Mikelberg F, Parfitt C, Swindale N et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995; 4: 242-7.
8. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 545-8.
9. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 121-7.
10. Hodapp E, Parrish R II, Anderson D. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1993.
11. Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, Steinmann WG, Spaeth GL. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 758-63.
12. Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2002; 100: 181-5.
13. Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M et al. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 44-8.
14. Mardin CY, Horn FK. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998; 236: 641-5.
15. Kothy P, Nagymihaly A, Hollo G. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers. Med Sci Monit 2003; 9: PI1-4.
16. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 985-93.
17. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. The normal optic nerve head on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003; 51: 25-33.
18. Hermann MM, Theofylaktopoulos I, Bangard N, Jonescu-Cuypers C, Coburger S, Diestelhorst M. Optic nerve head morphometry in healthy adults using confocal laser scanning tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 761-5.
19. Gundersen KG, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Age, gender, IOP, refraction and optic disc topography in normal eyes. A cross-sectional study using raster and scanning laser tomography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 170-5.
20. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Optic disc size in exfoliative, primary open angle, and low-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 211-13.
21. Chi T, Ritch R, Stickler D et al. Racial differences in optic nerve head parameters. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 836-9.
22. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Naumann GO. Correlations of the optic disc size to glaucoma susceptibility. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 675-80.
23. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1145-50.
24. Iester M, Jonas JB, Mardin CY, Budde WM. Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 464-8.
25. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557-63.
26. Kamal DS, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF et al. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 290-4.
27. Jonas JB, Bergua A, Schmitz-Valckenberg P et al. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1764-73.
28. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 2393-401.