An incentive mechanism for electricity transmission expansion in Mexico

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 3003-3014

  Rosellón, Juan ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Electricity transmission expansion; Incentive regulation; Mexico

Indexed keywords

COSTS; EARNINGS; PROFITABILITY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION EXPANSION; INCENTIVE REGULATION; PRICING MODEL;

ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION;

COMMODITY PRICE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY POLICY; INCENTIVE; MONOPOLY; PROFITABILITY; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; TARIFF STRUCTURE;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33847780493     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bertoletti P., and Poletti C. Welfare effects of discriminatory two-part tariffs constrained by price caps. Economics Letters 56 (1997) 292-298
2. Bushnell J.B., and Stoft S.E. Improving private incentives for electric grid investment. Resource and Energy Economics 19 (1997) 85-108
3. California ISO and London Economics International, 2003. A proposed methodology for evaluating the economic benefits of transmission expansions in a restructured wholesale electricity market. Mimeo, 〈http://www.caiso.com/docs/2003/03/25/2003032514285219307〉.
4. Carreón-Rodríguez, V., Jiménez, A., Rosellón, J., 2006. The Mexican electricity sector: economic, legal, and political issues. In: Victor, D.G., Heller, T.C. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Electric Power Market Reform: The Experiences of Five Major Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN-13: 9780521865029.
5. Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE), 2000. A market power analysis of generation in Mexico. Mimeo.
6. Creti, A., Fabra, N., 2004. Capacity markets for electricity. Working Paper, UCEI, CSEM WP-124 (available at 〈http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PDF/csemwp124.pdf〉.
7. Grande, O.S., Wangensteen, I., 2000. Alternative models for congestion management and pricing impact on network planning and physical operation. CIGRE, Paris, August-September.
8. Hartley P., and Martínez-Chombo E. Electricity demand and supply in Mexico (2002), Mimeo, Rice University
9. Hogan, W., 2002a. Financial transmission right formulations. Mimeo, JFK School of Government, Harvard Electricity Policy Group, Harvard University, 〈http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/people/whogan〉.
10. Hogan, W., 2002b. Financial transmission right incentives: applications beyond Hedging. Presentation at the Harvard Electricity Policy Group's Twenty-Eighth Plenary Session, May 31, 〈http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/people/whogan〉.
11. Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas (IIE), 2003. Metodología de asignación de los costos de transmisión con base en los costos marginales de corto plazo de la energía y en los beneficios a los usuarios. Mimeo.
12. Joskow, P., Tirole, J., 2002. Transmission investment: alternative institutional frameworks. Mimeo.
13. Joskow P., and Tirole J. Merchant transmission investment. Journal of Industrial Economics 53 2 (2005) 233
14. Kristiansen T., and Rosellón J. A merchant mechanism for electricity transmission expansion. Journal of Regulatory Economics 29 2 (2006) 167-193
15. Léautier T.O. Regulation of an electric power transmission company. Energy Journal 21 4 (2000) 61-92
16. Littlechild, S., 2004. Regulated and merchant interconnectors in Australia: SNI and Murraylink revisited. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 0410.
17. Littlechild, S., Skerk, C.J., 2004a. Regulation of transmission expansion in Argentina: Part I. Developments since the fourth line. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 0465.
18. Littlechild, S,. Skerk., C.J., 2004b. Regulation of transmission expansion in Argentina: Part II. State ownership, reform, and the fourth line. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 0410.
19. Madrigal, M., 2000. Escenarios de estructura competitiva del mercado eléctrico mexicano. Mimeo presentation.
20. Madrigal, M., de Rosenzweig, F., Gutiérrez, G., Femat, J.C., 2002. Predicting structural market power in the Mexican electricity system: an optimization-based approach. Presentation at INFORMS Annual Meeting, San José, CA, November 19.
21. Pérez-Arriaga J.I., Rubio F.J., Puerta Gutiérrez J.F., et al. Marginal pricing of transmission services: an analysis of cost recovery. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 10 1 (1995)
22. Rosellón J. Different approaches to supply adequacy in electricity markets. Energy Studies Review 14 2 (2006)
23. Rotger J., and Felder F.A. Reconciling market-based transmission and transmission planning. The Electricity Journal 14 9 (2001) 31-43
24. Rubio-Odériz J., and Pérez-Arriaga I.J. Marginal pricing of transmission services: a comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 15 1 (2000) 448-454
25. Schweppe F., Caramanis M., Tabors R., and Bohn R. Spot Pricing of Electricity (1988), Kluwer, Norwell, MA
26. Secretaría de Energía (Sener), 2002. Prospectiva del sector eléctrico, 2002-2011, Mexico City.
27. Secretaría de Energía, 2006. Prospectiva del sector eléctrico, 2005-2014, Mexico City.
28. Sheffrin, A., Wolak, F.A., 2001. Methodology for analyzing transmission upgrades: two alternative proposals. Mimeo
29. Shirmohammadi D., et al. Evaluation of transmission network capacity use for wheeling transactions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 4 4 (1989) 1405-1413
30. Transpower, 2002. Confirmed pricing methodology. Final design principles. Mimeo.
31. Vogelsang I. Price regulation for independent transmission companies. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20 2 (2001) 141-165
32. Vogelsang I. Electricity transmission pricing and performance based regulation. Energy Journal 27 4 (2006) 97-126
33. Vogelsang I., and Finsinger J. A regulatory adjustment process for optimal pricing by multiproduct Monopoly firms. Bell Journal of Economics 10 1 (1979) 157-171
34. Wolak F.A. An empirical model of the impact of hedge contract on bidding behavior in a competitive electricity market. International Economic Journal 14 2 (2000) 1-39