Efficient 3d prostate surface detection for ultrasound guided robotic biopsy

International Journal of Humanoid Robotics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 439-461

  Shao, Fan ^a   Ling, Keck Voon ^b   Phee, Louis ^b,c   Ng, Wan Sing ^b,c   Xiao, Di ^d  

^a TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^d SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Bubbles; Prostate biopsy; Surface detection; Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

BOUNDARY LEAKING PROBLEM; BUBBLES MODEL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND (TRUS) IMAGES; ULTRASOUND GUIDED ROBOTIC BIOPSY;

BIOPSY;

EID: 33847773222     PISSN: 02198436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219843606000862     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. S. J. Berry, D. S. Coffey, P. C. Walsh and L. L. Ewing, The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age, J. Urology 132(3) (1984) 474-479.
2. A. Von Eschenbach, R. Ho, G. P. Murphy, M. Cunningham and N. Lins, American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: Update 1997, CA - Cancer J. Clin. 47(5) (1997) 261-264.
3. K. S. Chia, A. Seow, H. P. Lee and K. Shanmugaratnam, Cancer incidence in Singapore 1993-1997, Singapore Cancer Registry Report, No. 5 (2000).
4. L. A. Piegl and W. Tiller, The NURBS Book (Monographs in Visual Communications), 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
5. V. Chalana and Y. Kim, A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(5) (1997) 642-652.
6. R. G. Aarnink, S. D. Pathak, J. J. M. C. H. de la Rosette, F. M. J. Debruyne, Y. Kim and H. Wijkstra, Edge detection in prostatic ultrasound images using integrated edge maps, Ultrasonics 36(1-5) (1998) 635-642.
7. C. H. Chen, J. Y. Lee, W. H. Yang, C. M. Chang and Y. N. Sun, Segmentation and reconstruction of prostate from transrectal ultrasound images, Biomed. Eng. Appl. Bas. Commun. 8(3) (1996) 39-44.
8. Y. J. Liu, W. S. Ng, M. Y. Teo and H. C. Lim, Computerised prostate boundary estimation in ultrasound images using the radial bas-relief method, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 35(5) (1997) 445-454.
9. S. D. Pathak, V. Chalana, D. R. Haynor and Y. Kim, Edge-guided boundary delineation in prostate ultrasound images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19(12) (2000) 1211-1219.
10. S. D. Pathak, R. G. Aarnink, J. J. de la Rosette, V. Chalana, H. Wijkstra, F. M. J. Debruyne and Y. Kim, Quantitative three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound for prostate imaging, in Proc. SPIE: Medical Imaging 1998, San Diego, CA, Vol. 3335 (22-24 February, 1998), pp. 83-92.
11. H. M. Ladak, F. Mao, Y. Wang, D. B. Downey, D. A. Steinman and A. Fenster, Prostate segmentation from 2D ultrasound images, Med. Phys. 27(8) (2000) 1777-1788.
12. A. Ghanei, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, A. Ratkewicz and F.-F. Yin, A three-dimensional deformable model for segmentation of human prostate from ultrasound images, Med. Phys. 28(10) (2001) 2147-2153.
13. C. Knoll, M. Alcaniz, V. Grau, C. Monserrat and M. C. Juan, Outlining of the prostate using snakes with shape restrictions based on the wavelet transform, Pattern Recogn. 32(10) (1999) 1767-1781.
14. J. S. Prater and W. D. Richard, Segmenting ultrasound images of the prostate using neural networks, Ultrasonic Imaging 14(2) (1992) 159-185.
15. R. Y. Wu, K. V. Ling and W. S. Ng, Automatic prostate boundary recognition in sonographic images using feature model and genetic algorithm, J. Ultrasound Med. 19(11) (2000) 771-782.
16. J. A. Sethian, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
17. F. Shao, K. V. Ling and W. S. Ng, Automatic 3D prostate surface detection from TRUS with level sets, Int. J. Image Graph. 4(3) (2004) 385-403.
18. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird and D. B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EMalgorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. 39(1) (1977) 1-38.
19. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, G. Sapiro and C. Sbert, Minimal surfaces: A geometric three dimensional segmentation approach, Numer. Math. 77(4) (1997) 423-451.
20. A. Yezzi, S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver and A. Tannenbaum, A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(2) (1997) 199-209.
21. M. Kass, A. Witkin and D. Terzopoulos, Snakes: Active contour models, Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1(4) (1987) 321-331.
22. N. Aspert, D. Santa-Cruz and T. Ebrahimi, MESH: Measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2002), Lausanne, Switzerland (22-29 August, 2002), pp. 705-708.
23. P. E. Shrout and J. L. Fleiss, Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability, Psychol. Bull. 86(2) (1979) 420-427.
24. C. Brechbühler, G. Gerig and O. Kübler, Parametrization of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description, Comput. Vis. and Image Und. 61(2) (1995) 154-170.
25. D. Terzopoulos and D. Metaxas, Dynamic 3D models with local and global deformations: Deformable superquadrics, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. 13(7) (1991) 703-714.