Occupational asthma and rhinitis in workers from a lasamide production line

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 74-78

  Klusáčková, Pavlína ^a   Lebedová, Jindřiška ^a   Pelclová, Daniela ^a   Šalandová, Jana ^b   Šenholdová, Zdeňka ^a   Navrátil, Tomáš ^c  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b Pardubice Regional Hospital   (Czech Republic)

^c J HEYROVSKÝ INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

2,4 dichloro 5 chlorsulfonylbenzoic acid; 2,4 dichloro 5 sulfamoylbenzoic acid; Bronchoconstriction; Furosemide; Rhinomanometry; Specific test

Indexed keywords

2,4 DICHLORO 5 SULFAMOYLBENZOIC ACID; BENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ASTHMA; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISK; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRONCHOSPASM; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL WORKER; MALE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRICK TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROVOCATION TEST; RESPIRATORY TRACT ALLERGY; RHINITIS; SKIN TEST; SPIROMETRY; SYMPTOM;

EID: 33847765036     PISSN: 03553140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1067     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cartier A, Bernstein IL, Burge PS, Cohn JR, Fabbri LM, Hargreave FE, et al. Guidelines for bronchoprovocation on the investigation of occupational asthma: report of the Subconimittee on Bronchoprovocation for Occupational Asthma. J Allergy Clin Imxnunol. 1989;84:823-9.
2. Sevapharma [homepage on the Internet]. Prague: Sevapharma a.s.; 2006 [cited April 7, 2006]. Diagnostické alergeny pro intradermální a prick testy [Diagnostic allergens for intradermal and prick tests]. Available in English from: http://www.imuna.cz/index.php?page=0&lng=en
3. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows: report working party: standardization of lung function tests. [Official statement of the European Respiratory Society]. Eur Respir J. 1993;6 suppl 16:5-40.
4. Satinská J. Spirometrie, křivka průtok- objem [Spirometry, flow- volume curve]. In: Fišerová J, Chlumský J, Satinská J, Bortlová A, Jurikovič I, Štěpáník M, editors. Funkční vyšetření plic [Lung function tests]. Praha: GEUM; 2004. p 13-23.
5. Sterk PJ, Fabbri LM, Quanjer PH, Cockcroft DW, O'Byrne PM, Anderson SD, et al. Airway responsiveness: standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults: report working party: standardization of lung function tests [Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society]. Eur Respir J. 1993;6 suppl 16:53-83.
6. APS Instruction manual 1986, version 2, Art. No. 780092, Höchberg, Erich Jaeger GmbH & CO. KG.
7. Rhinoscreen instruction manual, version 1.1. Wuerzburg (Germany): Erich Jaeger GmbH & CO KG; 1994, Item no 780760.
8. Hajduková Z, Nakládalová M, Brhel P. K diagnostice profesionálního astmatu [Diagnostics of occupational asthma]. Prac Lék. 2004;56(1):17-19.
9. Bernstein JA, Bernstein DI. Occupational asthma: diagnostic approaches and treatment. In: Bush RK. Environmental asthma. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2001. p 265-84.
10. Klimentová G. Profesionálna asthma bronchiale [Occupational asthma]. In: Buchancová J, Klimentová G, Šulcová M, Fabiánová E, editors. Pracovné lekárstvo a toxikológia [Occupational medicine and toxicology]. Martin (Slovak Republic): Osveta; 2003. p 626-40.
11. Strom BL, Schinnar R, Apter AJ, Margolis DJ, Lautenbach E, Hennessy S, et al. Absence of cross-reactivity between sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfonamide nonantibiotics. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1628-35.
12. Johnson KK, Green DL, Rife JP, Limon L. Sulfonamide cross-reactivity: fact or fiction. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:290-301.
13. Jarvis J, Seed MJ, Elton R, Sawyer L, Agius R. Relationship between chemical structure and the occupational asthma hazard of low molecular weight organic compounds. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:243-50.