Research recommendations for the American Telemedicine Association

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 579-589

  Krupinski, Elizabeth ^a,l   Dimmick, Susan ^b   Grigsby, Jim ^c   Mogel, Greg ^d   Puskin, Dena ^e   Speedie, Stuart ^f   Stamm, Beth ^g   Wakefield, Bonnie ^h   Whited, John ⁱ   Whitten, Pamela ^j   Yellowlees, Peter ^k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Off for the Adv of Telehealth   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

ⁱ DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ERGONOMICS; HEALTH CARE; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PATIENT TREATMENT;

LONG TERM ACCEPTANCE; RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS; TELEHEALTH; TELEMEDICINE COMMUNITY;

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ERGONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; TELEHEALTH; TELEMEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; RESEARCH; SOCIETIES; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847758732     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.579     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. United States General Accounting Office. Telehealth: federal strategy is needed to guide investments. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/NSIAD/HEHS-97-67. Washington D.C.: General Accounting Office, 1997 Unites States General Accounting Office, Washington, DC; February 1997.
2. Hersh WR, ed. Telehealth for the Medicare population. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 24. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001.
3. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telehealth. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:1-7.
4. Hersh W, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, Greenlick M. A systematic review of the efficacy of telehealth for making diagnostic and management decisions. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:197-209.
5. Hersh WR, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, Greenlick M. Clinical outcomes resulting from telehealth interventions: A systematic review. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 2001;1:5.
6. Demiris G, Tao D. An analysis of the specialized literature in the field of telehealth. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:316-319.
7. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
8. Charmaz K. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003:249-291.
9. Salkind NJ. Tests & measurement for people who (think they) hate tests & measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2006.
10. Hayes BE. Measuring customer satisfaction: Survey design, use, and statistical analysis methods. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press, 1997.
11. Crano WD, Brewer MB. Principles and methods of social research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
12. World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments: www.who.int/evidence/assessment-instruments/qol (Last accessed December 20, 2005.
13. Rosenstock I. Historical origins of the Hhealth Belief Model. Health Education Monographs. Vol. 2, No. 4, 1974.
14. Glanz K, Marcus Lewis F, Rimer BK. Theory at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice. National Institutes of Health, 1997.
15. www.usms.nist.gov/workshops/MedicalImaging.htm Last accessed January 15, 2006.
16. www.atmeda.org/ICOT/diabeticretionpathy.FINAL.pdf Last accessed January 16, 2006.
17. www.medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup100_ft.pdf Last accessed January 15, 2006.
18. www.medical.nema.org/ Last accessed January 5, 2006.
19. www.atmeda.org/ICOT/sigtechnology.htm Last accessed December 20, 2005.
20. Yellowlees P, Harry D. Standards for data collection and monitoring within a telehealth research network. J Telemed Telecare (in press).
21. American College of Radiology: www.acr.org/s_acr/bin.asp?CID=541&DID= 12292&DOC=FILE.PDF Last accessed December 6, 2005.
22. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, M Helfand M. Diagnosis, access, and outcomes: Update of a systematic review on telehealth services. J Telemed Telecare (in press).
23. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure 1960;20:37-16.
24. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Erlichman M. Advancing the Evidence Base of Telehealth: Overview of supplement. J Telemed Telecare (in press).
25. Harris AD, McGregor JC, Perencevich EN, Furuno JP, Zhu J, Peterson DE, Finkelstein J. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. JAMIA 2006;13:16-23.
26. Grigsby J, Bennett RE. Alternatives to randomized controlled trials in telehealth. J Telemed Telecare (in press).
27. Whitten P. Will we see data repositories for telehealth activity in the near future? J Telemed Telecare (in press).
28. Ingelfinger JA, Mosteller F, Thibodeau LA, Ware JH. Biostatistics in clinical medicine. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, Inc., 1994.
29. Mould RF. Introductory medical statistics. Philadelphia, PA: Institute of Physics Publishing, 1998.
30. Swets JA. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: Collected papers. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
31. Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982.
32. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-731.
33. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: www.healthit.ahrq.gov/home/ index.html Last accessed January 4, 2006.
34. Shneiderman B. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.
35. Vicente K. The human factor: Revolutionizing the way people live with technology. New York, NY: Routledge, 2003.
36. Bangert DC, Doktor R. Human and organizational dynamics in e-health. Seattle, WA: Radcliffe Publishing, 2005.
37. Shea S. What health delivery system changes are required when integrating telehealth into existing treatment flows of information and patients. Workflow, productivity, resources. J Telemed Telecare (in press).
38. Stronge AJ, Nichols TA, Rasche JD, Sessions RG, Fisk AD, Rogers WA. An application of human factors methods to teledermatology. In: Bangert DC, Doktor R, eds. Human and organizational dynamics in e-health. Seattle, WA: Radcliffe Publishing, 2005:13-31.
39. Federal Aviation Commission, Human Factors Toolbox: www.hf.faa.gov/ Portal/toolsbytypetally.aspx Last accessed January 15, 2006.
40. Tunis SR. Economic analysis in healthcare decisions. Am J Managed Care 2004;10:301-304.
41. Drummond M, McGuire A. Economic evaluation in healthcare: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
42. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1996.