Goal-oriented optimal subset selection of correlated multimedia streams

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Atrey, Pradeep K ^a   Kankanhalli, Mohan S ^a   Oommen, John B ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agreement coefficient; Confidence fusion; Media fusion; Optimal media selection

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; HEURISTIC METHODS; MICROPHONES; SENSORS;

AGREEMENT COEFFICIENT; CONFIDENCE FUSION; MEDIA FUSION; OPTIMAL MEDIA SELECTION;

MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847757153     PISSN: 15516857     EISSN: 15516865     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1198302.1198304     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. ATREY, P. K. AND KANKANHALLI, M. S. 2005. Goal based optimal selection of media streams. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). 805-308.
2. ATREY, P. K., KANKANHALLI, M. S., AND JAIN, R. 2005. Timeline-Based information assimilation in multimedia surveillance and monitoring systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (Singapore). 103-112.
3. ATREY, P. K., MADDAGE, N. C., AND KANKANHALLI, M. S. 2006. Audio based event detection for multimedia surveillance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. V813-816.
4. DEBOUK, R., LAFORTUNE, S., AND TENEKETZIS, D. 2002. On an optimal problem in sensor selection. J. Discrete Event Dynamic Syst.: Theory Appl. 12, 417-445.
5. ISLER, V. AND BAJCSY, R. 2005. The sensor selection problem for bounded uncertainty sensing models. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (Los Angeles, CA). 151-158.
6. JAIN, R. 2004. Refining the search engine. Ubiquity 5, 29 (Sept.).
7. JIANG, S., KUMAR, R., AND GARCIA, H. E. 2003. Optimal sensor selection for discrete event systems with partial observation. IEEE Trans. Autam. Control 48, 369-381.
8. LAM, K.-Y., CHENG, R., LIANG, B., AND CHAU, J. 2004. Sensor node selection for execution of continuous probabilistic queries in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (New York). 63-71.
9. NEVATIA, R., ZHAO, T., AND HONGENG, S. 2003. Hierarchical language-based representation of events in video streams. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Event Mining (Madison, WI).
10. OOMMEN, B. J. AND RUEDA, L. 2005. A formal analysis of why heuristic functions work. Artif. lntell. J. 164, 1-22.
11. PAHALAWATTA, P., PAPPAS, T. N., AND KATSAGGELOS, A. K. 2004. Optimal sensor selection for video-based target tracking in a wireless sensor network. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Singapore, V:3073-3076.
12. SIEGEL, M. AND WU, H. 2004. Confidence fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot Sensing. 96-99.
13. STAUFFER, C. AND GRIMSON, W. E. L. 1999. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2 (Ft. Collins, CO). 252-258.