A comparative study of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosis

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 313-318

  Samsen, Pathanee ^a   Chuenkongkaew, Wanicha L ^a   Masayaanon, Patcharapim ^a   Chirapapaisan, Niphon ^a   Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae ^a   Loket, Siriwan ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Acute optic neuritis; Multiple sclerosis; Recurrent optic neuritis; VEP latency

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RECURRENT DISEASE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33847756362     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Asselman P, Chadwick DW, Marsden DC. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 1975; 98: 261-82.
2. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972; 1: 982-5.
3. Frederiksen JL, Petrera J. Serial visual evoked potentials in 90 untreated patients with acute optic neuritis. Surv Ophthalmol 1999; 44(Suppl 1): S54-62.
4. Compston DA, Batchelor JR, Earl CJ, McDonald WI. Factors influencing the risk of multiple sclerosis developing in patients with optic neuritis. Brain 1978; 101: 495-511.
5. Isayama Y, Takahashi T, Shimoyoma T, Yamadori A. Acute optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1982; 32: 73-6.
6. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 227-31.
7. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 840-6.
8. Jones SJ. Visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Effect of time interval, age and disease dissemination. J Neurol 1993; 240: 489-94.
9. Brusa A, Jones SJ, Plant GT. Long-term remyelination after optic neuritis: a 2-year visual evoked potential and psychophysical serial study. Brain 2001; 124(Pt 3): 468-79.
10. Hidajat RR, Goode DH. Normalisation of visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Doc Ophthal mol 2003; 106: 305-9.
11. Cohen MM, Lessell S, Wolf PA. A prospective study of the risk of developing multiple sclerosis in uncomplicated optic neuritis. Neurology 1979; 29: 208-13.
12. Nilsson P, Larsson EM, Maly-Sundgren P, Perfekt R, Sandberg-Wollheim M. Predicting the outcome of optic neuritis: evaluation of risk factors after 30 years of follow-up. J Neurol 2005; 252: 396-402.