Comparison of different quality assessment functions in autoregulative illumination intensity algorithms

Optical Engineering

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2006, Pages

  Qu, Yufu ^a   Pu, Zhaobang ^b   Zhao, Huijie ^a   Zhao, Yuanbo ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Autoregulative intensity; Image quality assessment; Vision measurement

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIGHTING; VISION;

GRAY STANDARD DEVIATION; ILLUMINATION INTENSITY; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; IMAGE VARIANCE FUNCTION;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 33847750685     PISSN: 00913286     EISSN: 15602303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1117/1.2388924     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. http://www.mitutoyo.com/Products/cmm/.
2. http://www.ogpnet.com/na/ogpVideoSystems.jsp.
3. C. Jie and Z. X. Zhao, "Development of image quality assessment," Comput. Eng. 26 (11), 4-5 (2000).
4. Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik, and L. G. Lu, "Why is image quality assessment so difficult?" in IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 3313-3316 (2002).
5. A. M. Eskicioglu and P. S. Fisher, "Image quality measures and their performance," IEEE Trans. Commun. 43(12), 2959-2965 (1995).
6. Y. F. Qu, "Study of three dimensional dynamic measurement of video coordinate measuring machines," pp. 57-71, submitted PhD Dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology (2004).
7. S. T. Li, "Research on methods and applications of multi-sensor image information fusion," pp. 1-15, 59-60, submitted PhD Dissertation, Hunan University (2001).
8. J. W. Huang, Q. S. Yan, and X. H. Dai, "A segmentation based image coding algorithm using the features of human vision system," J. Image Graphics 4(5), 400-404 (1999).